|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,475
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,475 |
The dog anolgy is for idiots... Well, if the shoe fits...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,626
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,626 |
Idiots think they know everything, while intelligent people know they don't.....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,125
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,125 |
@ Zerk: When you find youself in a hole, it's best to stop digging . . . . 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 805
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 805 |
@ Zerk: When you find youself in a hole, it's best to stop digging . . . . Me?? Blows my mind that people don't see this. I think some do, they just don't want to say anything. Which is sad,but you got the butt buddy thing going. Atleast you are checking. I didn't for a long time. But there is no way the tips can not be aligned and the flats,which are perpindicular to the center axis, be right, or vice versa. Question is which is easier to see.
Last edited by Zerk; 08/14/17.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,804
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,804 |
I believe the question is whether the tips can be touching while the centerlines of the rods aren't colinear.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025 |
If the center axises are not lined up, the apexes are not touching each other, but rather the sides of the cone. As pointed out in numerous posts, touching points do not guarantee ring alignment. Points can touch, rods at an angle, not aligned. DF
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,993
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,993 |
Points can touch, rods at an angle, not aligned.
What??? That blows my mind!!!
A wise man is frequently humbled.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025 |
Points can touch, rods at an angle, not aligned.
What??? That blows my mind!!!  Seems pretty elementary, not rocket surgery. DF
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,052 |
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,025 |
DF
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,804
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,478
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,478 |
Not getting into this one,,, But if your interested
Some good information on vertically split rings, and tracking errors in the Scope section of Snipershide
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,374
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,374 |
tips touching but pens are NOT in a straight line ![[Linked Image]](https://s19.postimg.org/xarsrllfn/pen.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,993
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,993 |
Good thought on using a picture.........but I don't think its gonna work.
A wise man is frequently humbled.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197 |
Get a Defiance action....problem solved.
Luck....is the residue of design... ![[Linked Image]](http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp311/patrickgsinclair/96zvyt.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,749
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,749 |
But there is no way the tips can not be aligned and the flats,which are perpindicular to the center axis, be right, or vice versa. Question is which is easier to see.
This is the sorce of your problem. You have turned this into an either or situation...or a my way is best argument. If the question is which is easier to see, The answer is without question...THE FLATS. Not only is it easier to see...one can use feeler gages to tell how much. If you prefer to use the points...go for it...however, that does not make you right. On the other hand, if one chooses to use the flats...that does not make him/her wrong. We are up to 5 pages now and you can not seem to bring youself to that conclusion...and leave it alone.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,483
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,586
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,586 |
You can lead an ass to water but can't make him Drink. Found the flats worked best the first time I used the system.
Never take life to seriously, after all ,no one gets out of it alive.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,478
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,478 |
The device assumes 2 dimensions have been removed from the argument by assuming mounts are in the same plane, in the x axis and the same "tilt" in the y axis so if they line up in the z. Not to be used on bad receivers etc
It is a good thing First focal plane scopes are not Mobius strips and 2nd focal plane are not Klein bottles or this could turn into 5-Manifold Topology dilemma
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
|
645 members (12344mag, 1234, 163bc, 06hunter59, 17CalFan, 160user, 62 invisible),
2,354
guests, and
1,231
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,621
Posts18,455,093
Members73,908
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
