24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697
Originally Posted by olympicgold Larry Douchebag Root
blah blah blah



Poor Root. Still pathetic and a pariah.

Where's part 3 and 4 you psychotic delusional twat? Get busy beotch. 'Fire needs some lulz (everyone laughing at you, not with you). It's your story and delusional twatter. Make it good, but be careful swinging that purse.

You go girl!

GB1

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,414
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,414

Montana Badger . . . "Case capacity is HUGE!!!"

Yes it is. With modern powders, not as much "overbore" as it used to seem.

The .22 Newton did use necked down 30-06 brass with the shoulder set back, resulting in capacity of 54-55 grains of water/@3.5 cc (vs 68 gr H2O/4.4 cc for 30-06). The .270 Win or 25-06 case might be easier to work with, since they would require fewer steps and less effort in the necking-down procedure, although I like to avoid using cases with a confusing headstamp, if you already own a .270 or 25-06.

The 22 Newton used a .227/.228 bullet, which was the small bore before the .224 became popular. Bullets are a problem for the purist. A .224 Newton could avoid that hurdle. Or your idea of a 6.5-06 is also interesting. Much easier to make the cases and you will have a long-action 6.5/284 equivalent. Cooler than even a Creedmoor.

Let us know how your project turns out.


“You must endeavour to enjoy the pleasure of doing good. That is all that makes life valuable.”
Robert E. Lee, in a letter to his invalid wife.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,533
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,533
Originally Posted by Border Doc

Montana Badger . . . "Case capacity is HUGE!!!"

Yes it is. With modern powders, not as much "overbore" as it used to seem.

The .22 Newton did use necked down 30-06 brass with the shoulder set back, resulting in capacity of 54-55 grains of water/@3.5 cc (vs 68 gr H2O/4.4 cc for 30-06). The .270 Win or 25-06 case might be easier to work with, since they would require fewer steps and less effort in the necking-down procedure, although I like to avoid using cases with a confusing headstamp, if you already own a .270 or 25-06.

The 22 Newton used a .227/.228 bullet, which was the small bore before the .224 became popular. Bullets are a problem for the purist. A .224 Newton could avoid that hurdle. Or your idea of a 6.5-06 is also interesting. Much easier to make the cases and you will have a long-action 6.5/284 equivalent. Cooler than even a Creedmoor.

Let us know how your project turns out.



I believe the .22 newton is equal to a .224 TTH( .22/6mmrem. ) Which aint a horrible place to be, and if industrious could still use up some .270 brass. With the newer slow burning powders a .22-06 is more feasible then ever. I say build it, why not?????

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057
Originally Posted by olympicgold
Gee FO, sounds like a bit of a panic setting in ?

As for stupidity, I'd opine that someone who spends 10 years harassing other people while hiding behind a screen name is a poster boy for stupidity.


[Linked Image]


At least he's only hiding behind one screen name, unlike someone else that posts here.


"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, you'll be a mile from them, and you'll have their shoes."
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057
I never thought it would be that easy to smoke out a cockroach.


"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, you'll be a mile from them, and you'll have their shoes."
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,094
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,094
larry root is like a stinky, sticky turd you wipe, but starts itching an hour later because you missed a little.


God bless Texas-----------------------
Old 300
I will remain what i am until the day I die- A HUNTER......Sitting Bull
Its not how you pick the booger..
but where you put it !!
Roger V Hunter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,094
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,094
larry root is like a stinky, sticky turd you wipe, but starts itching an hour later because you missed a little.


God bless Texas-----------------------
Old 300
I will remain what i am until the day I die- A HUNTER......Sitting Bull
Its not how you pick the booger..
but where you put it !!
Roger V Hunter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697
Few things as humorous as an ardent gender confused geriatric TROLL feigning fortitude.

Be sure and open your yap all the way Larry, so as to get both of your feet in there!

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068
G
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,068
This thread caused me to get lost again in Landis's book and he states the .22 Newton was "made by swaging and necking down the 7mm Mauser cartridge." Other mega-velocity wildcats of the era that were iterations of the generic ".22-06" were made with '06 cases re-sized to essentially 7x57 capacity. Like I said earlier, probably as a nod to the lack of optimal powders back then. (Although both refer to loads built with 4350, which was about as slow as it got in the late 40's. Surplus 4831 hadn't arrived yet.) Newton saw the cartridge as a long range medium game cartridge, with original performance being a 90 grain bullet at just shy of 3200fps- none too shabby for 100+ years ago..

Ackley stated that he felt 7x57 cases represented optimal case capacity for .22's, at the time. He did base his .228 Ackley Magnum on the full length '06 case though.

I'm merely reporting on state of the art circa 1946. I know not what direction .22-06 case design/capacity took since then.

What really caught my eye in Ness's book was a couple .22 wildcats based on the H&H Magnum case, with wild velocities in the 4000 fps range with 70 grains 4350 and 65 grain bullet. Who knows for sure- they were guesstimating for the most part (and quickly burning out barrels in the process). One cartridge, a .22 based on the .348 case claimed to hit 4300fps with 60 grains 4350 and 40 grain Sisk bullet, confirmed at a General Motors test range in California in 1945.

My god, what a freewheeling time for wildcatters. I often wonder how many eyes and hands were lost back then too.

Last edited by gnoahhh; 03/12/18.

"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz
"Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
Originally Posted by smokinggun
How about 6mm-06? That's what I did with my SAKO AIII. 3350 fps is plenty fast enough.


6mm Remington on a long action with RL 19 will do that....with I am sure, less powder... 10 grains plus I bet.


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

IC B3

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,273
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,273
Originally Posted by Seafire
Originally Posted by smokinggun
How about 6mm-06? That's what I did with my SAKO AIII. 3350 fps is plenty fast enough.


6mm Remington on a long action with RL 19 will do that....with I am sure, less powder... 10 grains plus I bet.


I guess I should have stated that it shoots 105 gr HPBT at 3350 fps. Will the 6mm Remy do that with 10 grains less powder?

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057
Originally Posted by Border Doc

Montana Badger . . . "Case capacity is HUGE!!!"

Yes it is. With modern powders, not as much "overbore" as it used to seem.

The .22 Newton did use necked down 30-06 brass with the shoulder set back, resulting in capacity of 54-55 grains of water/@3.5 cc (vs 68 gr H2O/4.4 cc for 30-06). The .270 Win or 25-06 case might be easier to work with, since they would require fewer steps and less effort in the necking-down procedure, although I like to avoid using cases with a confusing headstamp, if you already own a .270 or 25-06.

The 22 Newton used a .227/.228 bullet, which was the small bore before the .224 became popular. Bullets are a problem for the purist. A .224 Newton could avoid that hurdle. Or your idea of a 6.5-06 is also interesting. Much easier to make the cases and you will have a long-action 6.5/284 equivalent. Cooler than even a Creedmoor.

Let us know how your project turns out.


Originally Posted by Border Doc

Montana Badger . . . "Case capacity is HUGE!!!"

Yes it is. With modern powders, not as much "overbore" as it used to seem.

The .22 Newton did use necked down 30-06 brass with the shoulder set back, resulting in capacity of 54-55 grains of water/@3.5 cc (vs 68 gr H2O/4.4 cc for 30-06). The .270 Win or 25-06 case might be easier to work with, since they would require fewer steps and less effort in the necking-down procedure, although I like to avoid using cases with a confusing headstamp, if you already own a .270 or 25-06.

The 22 Newton used a .227/.228 bullet, which was the small bore before the .224 became popular. Bullets are a problem for the purist. A .224 Newton could avoid that hurdle. Or your idea of a 6.5-06 is also interesting. Much easier to make the cases and you will have a long-action 6.5/284 equivalent. Cooler than even a Creedmoor.

Let us know how your project turns out.


I appreciate the info, but it's not my project.


"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, you'll be a mile from them, and you'll have their shoes."
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
Originally Posted by smokinggun
Originally Posted by Seafire
Originally Posted by smokinggun
How about 6mm-06? That's what I did with my SAKO AIII. 3350 fps is plenty fast enough.


6mm Remington on a long action with RL 19 will do that....with I am sure, less powder... 10 grains plus I bet.


I guess I should have stated that it shoots 105 gr HPBT at 3350 fps. Will the 6mm Remy do that with 10 grains less powder?


Fair Question....

46 grains of Rl 19 will send a 115 grain Berger at 3250s fps out of a 24 inch Barrel... bullet seated to long action
magazine length....

same load will run the 105 at 3350 fps... same info as above...

Pac Nor barrel, one in 7 twist...

Comparing the 6mm Rem in this application vs the 6mm/06, is exactly the same logic as
the 6.5 Creedmoor is vs say a 260 or the 6Creedmoor Vs 243...

bullet is seated less in the powder room, and more outside of it...looks like a mini ICBM...

This comparison is only availabe if the 6mm Rem is utilizing a long action...

on a short action its possible but it has to be a single shot with the chamber throated for a long finished cartridge.


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,597
2
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
2
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,597
I’ve been working with 3 brand new 6mm/06’s lately. One thing about odd six brass, it’s plentiful and a lot cheaper than 284 brass. If you have a cheap barrel and brass on hand along with a 22 neck sizer you sure don’t have much to lose. Please post velocity’s. I get 3900 with 70 noslers in the 6mm06. H414 powder and 27” barrel.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,424
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,424
Come to think of it, a 5.56 by 57 would be less ridiculous than a 22.06.


Up hills slow,
Down hills fast
Tonnage first and
Safety last.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,697
Originally Posted by Dave_Skinner
Come to think of it, a 5.56 by 57 would be less ridiculous than a 22.06.


22 TTH.....


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,650
C
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,650
Originally Posted by 222ND
I’ve been working with 3 brand new 6mm/06’s lately. One thing about odd six brass, it’s plentiful and a lot cheaper than 284 brass. If you have a cheap barrel and brass on hand along with a 22 neck sizer you sure don’t have much to lose. Please post velocity’s. I get 3900 with 70 noslers in the 6mm06. H414 powder and 27” barrel.


Kinda my logic... last batch of bulk .30-06 brass I bought was $20/500 (primed)... .223 take-off barrels are about free and the R700 ADL came to me on trade (and has NO TAKERS at $350)... so I figured I would play around some. Also swimming in Nosler 80 gr CC pills from SPS. Problem is the .223 take off barrel is 1:12... and I need 1:6 (possibly 1:7)

http://www.bergerbullets.com/twist-rate-calculator/

http://www.jbmballistics.com/ballistics/lengths/lengths.shtml#Nosler

That... and the Root "taint" got me thinking something else.

...I already have two 9.3x62M

Maybe a 6.5-06 A-Square

Love having data already published... https://load-data.nosler.com/load-data/65-06-a-square/


If you are not actively engaging EVERY enemy you encounter... you are allowing another to fight for you... and that is cowardice... plain and simple.



Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,597
2
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
2
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,597
8 twist would stabilize 80 grain noslers easily

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 146
D
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
D
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 146
Have a 22-06 that my father-in-law either had built, or bought. It has a 28 in. Douglas barrel, mauser action, and a thumbhole stock with very nice wood.
I have the dies, although could not find load info. The good people at western powders gave me load data, after supplying them needed cartridge measurements.
Did some moderate loads with 55 gr. Vmax bullets at 3850 fps. And are about .5 moa. All of this took place 8 or nine years ago, what is interesting is that I found his load data today in a cigar box with a bit of brass. One of the loads is a 60 gr. Bullet just over 4000 fps.
This is a standard 06 case necked down. It comes out once a year, as my brother-in-law packs this 9 pounder on our annual coyote hunt. It has killed one or more dogs every year. We always think of father in law, when a dog expires with his rifle. His last name by the way is Newton

Last edited by doghunter12; 03/18/18.
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,773
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,773
22-06 is really kinda pointless as it just burns more powder to get the same result as a swift....a 6mm-06 might be a better choice as you could probably get 4000 out of a heavier bullet...

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

571 members (12344mag, 10gaugemag, 007FJ, 10Glocks, 1234, 1lessdog, 70 invisible), 2,439 guests, and 1,227 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,667
Posts18,455,828
Members73,909
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.099s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9050 MB (Peak: 1.0629 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-19 19:10:29 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS