Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire If "Nobody" had been a candidate, he would have won!

the map says that even more people didn't vote at all.

Some comments in bold for you. If we ever get to a third (or more) party electorate, it will truly be the end of this country as we know it. Hell, we're halfway there.. The good thing about most people not voting is most are unqualified to exercise that responsibility anyway. Own property, pay taxes and pass a simple civics test, then vote, otherwise...

Or could this map be called a "Complacency Map"? As I recall, Hillary supporters thought they had it in the bag. Many were just too busy to actually go out and vote. I remember the joke that Hillary was so far in the lead early on that many Dems just started partying. Then the Repubs got home from work and went to vote.

I would think it is not too different than previous presidential elections.

Hell Jorge, you just like the single party countries!

Then why make it as news?

The cream of the corksuckers crop, but dont leave out the barrios of Houston, El Paso, Santa Fe, etc.

Gutless lying lieberals would call Trump Satan if he walked on water.

Rush was a turd because he hoped Zero would fail in his effort to remake America, but they become apoplectic over their fear Trump will MAGA.

No, it's not much different from previous elections.

But it doesn't mean what it's been cited to mean.

What it really is, is a depiction of the degree of success of demonrat voter fraud.

There is a large percentage of citizens that don;t vote, although it's nowhere as large as it's reported to be.

People respondin to the poll part of the equation, who said they didn't vote, would be surprised to find out that they *did*.

And, they voted demonrat.

People in the politics game, call it the "ground game", or the ability to "get out the vote".

But what it is, is voter fraud. Soros and socialist minions have focused Soros' money on S/S elections for years.

Because the S/S controls the election process, including special elections procedure, and when a particular issue appears on a ballot.

In states where the S/S is a demonrat, voter fraud is a given, and those states are pretty closely reflected in the BS map in the OP.

Here in MOtown, the "ground game" goes like this:

- Workers are paid to collect signatures/addresses of people likely to vote d, statistic-wise.

- "Pollsters" visit those who give the information, with the stated purpose of "polling", but the real purposes are:

To determine if the person is likely to vote; and to obtain a utility bill or other "satisfactory" ID for voting purposes.

Then, the person who isn't going to vote, according to their answers to the "pollster", *is* going to vote.

Buses take certain segments of society, who are given alcohol, cigarettes and cash cards, from poll to poll, where they are handed the utility bills to go in and vote for the people who won't, and vote d.

There are screwups occasionally, and 101% of eligible voters vote, because some who said they wouldn't vote, decided to vote after all.

But nothin's ever done about that anyway.

That's why the fight against voter ID is a fight to the death, for the ds.

Exactly...stupidest thread since PP addled's last.

I don't think too many people realize how many don't vote. So it's new information. (news)