24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 216
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 216
I recommend NEVER going above published max. The bullet manufactures and powder companies are experts on pressure. It make absolutely no sense to ever exceed maximum. If you study ballistics you will find that 50 fps or 100 fps faster is meaningless out to 600. Exceeding max even if you can't identify pressure issues is harder on your rifle and shortens case life.

Nosler lists minimum speed of 1800 fps for their bullet to expand properly. So using this as an example

Your load at 2595 fps will carry 1814 fps to 475 yards with 1023 ft lbs.
Getting to 2695 fps will carry 1821 fps to 525 yards with 1031 ft lbs.

So that 100 fps gets you an extra 50 yards well beyond normal hunting distances.

GB1

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890
3
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
3
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 890
Originally Posted by Adams
I recommend NEVER going above published max. The bullet manufactures and powder companies are experts on pressure. It make absolutely no sense to ever exceed maximum. If you study ballistics you will find that 50 fps or 100 fps faster is meaningless out to 600. Exceeding max even if you can't identify pressure issues is harder on your rifle and shortens case life.

Nosler lists minimum speed of 1800 fps for their bullet to expand properly. So using this as an example

Your load at 2595 fps will carry 1814 fps to 475 yards with 1023 ft lbs.
Getting to 2695 fps will carry 1821 fps to 525 yards with 1031 ft lbs.

So that 100 fps gets you an extra 50 yards well beyond normal hunting distances.


Makes perfect sense to exceed maximum manual loads for cartridges such as the 6.5 Swede or 7x57; those are loaded rather anemic for the obvious reason within the manuals. I can appreciate the meaningless from an external ballistic and velocity viewpoint, but from an internal ballistic perspective I want my slow burn rate rifle powders burning around 60 ksi rather than upper 40's/lower 50's.

Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 216
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by 32_20fan


Makes perfect sense to exceed maximum manual loads for cartridges such as the 6.5 Swede or 7x57; those are loaded rather anemic for the obvious reason within the manuals. I can appreciate the meaningless from an external ballistic and velocity viewpoint, but from an internal ballistic perspective I want my slow burn rate rifle powders burning around 60 ksi rather than upper 40's/lower 50's.


For people with your knowledge level fine. But I don't agree with telling people with lessor knowledge to exceed recommended maximums and possibly exceed maximum pressure. jmho.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,234
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,234
Originally Posted by Adams
I recommend NEVER going above published max. The bullet manufactures and powder companies are experts on pressure. It make absolutely no sense to ever exceed maximum. If you study ballistics you will find that 50 fps or 100 fps faster is meaningless out to 600. Exceeding max even if you can't identify pressure issues is harder on your rifle and shortens case life.




So what if Nosler's load data has different (higher) max loads than Hodgdon's load data? Which one are you going to use? Personally, that's what a chrono is for during load development. Can't have speed without pressure.


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,624
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,624
Notice he’s shooting a partition which I believe to be a flat base. Had 53 grain SMK going 175 fps slower than a 52 for same rifles and powder charge. Long story short the guy from Sierra said it is not uncommon as a flat base will have more bearing surface than a boat tail of same weight or close. Thus the lower velocity. Seeings how Nosler and Sierra tend to clump similar weight bullets, but different profiles to general data I can see this might have some bearing.



Swifty
IC B2

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 302
P
pdman Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
P
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 302
HEY ALL..I appreciate all the help and replies....I generally like to use the heaviest bullets available at the highest speeds attainable....THIS THIS Sako A7 is rather HEAVY...over 9lbs scoped....
I just cannot see lugging this boat anchor around when I have a AR 6.5 Grendel @6 3/4lbs scoped that will equal its speed with 125 Partitions with a 16"bbl....THIS Sako A7 is going down the road....
Thanks to all for your help and insight...
Pete

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,813
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,813
Originally Posted by 32_20fan
Originally Posted by Adams
I recommend NEVER going above published max. The bullet manufactures and powder companies are experts on pressure. It make absolutely no sense to ever exceed maximum. If you study ballistics you will find that 50 fps or 100 fps faster is meaningless out to 600. Exceeding max even if you can't identify pressure issues is harder on your rifle and shortens case life.

Nosler lists minimum speed of 1800 fps for their bullet to expand properly. So using this as an example

Your load at 2595 fps will carry 1814 fps to 475 yards with 1023 ft lbs.
Getting to 2695 fps will carry 1821 fps to 525 yards with 1031 ft lbs.

So that 100 fps gets you an extra 50 yards well beyond normal hunting distances.


Makes perfect sense to exceed maximum manual loads for cartridges such as the 6.5 Swede or 7x57; those are loaded rather anemic for the obvious reason within the manuals. I can appreciate the meaningless from an external ballistic and velocity viewpoint, but from an internal ballistic perspective I want my slow burn rate rifle powders burning around 60 ksi rather than upper 40's/lower 50's.


I have a Sako 22-250 that could be nicknamed Linda Lovelace. It takes top charges plus to get perking. Simple really, it's the Weatherby freebore effect applied to a standard cartridge.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385
This is what is wrong with the "bandwagon" 6.5 Creedmoor shooting. The cartridge was developed for long range shooting and a 140 grain Partition isn't a long range bullet. If you want Creedmoor performance, shoot long range with the stuff they designed for it. If you want to kill something, just use a 270 and a 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps and you will kill anything the Creedmoor will shoot at and within hunting distances, there will be no disappointment with a nearly 100 year old cartridge.


Originally Posted by RJY66

I was thinking the other day how much I used to hate Bill Clinton. He was freaking George Washington compared to what they are now.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,813
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,813
For a couple of reasons I like to keep my powder consumption fifteen to twenty grains below 60 grains a shot.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,721
K
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
K
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,721
Originally Posted by HitnRun
This is what is wrong with the "bandwagon" 6.5 Creedmoor shooting. The cartridge was developed for long range shooting and a 140 grain Partition isn't a long range bullet. If you want Creedmoor performance, shoot long range with the stuff they designed for it. If you want to kill something, just use a 270 and a 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps and you will kill anything the Creedmoor will shoot at and within hunting distances, there will be no disappointment with a nearly 100 year old cartridge.


The creedmoor threads sure bring out stupid replies.

lol he's loading the wrong bullet so he should just shoot a 270 instead. Makes perfect sense.



IC B3

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Shot my Christensen Mesa LR in 6.5CM this weekend with my standby load from other 6.5CMs - Hornady case, Fed GM210, 140gr A-Max, 42.1gr H4350, 2.825" COAL, 2731FPS average across 20rnds, ES 9 fps, and .312"@100yds.


I never thought I'd grow up to be a grumpy old man, but I did, and I'm killin' it.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
LMBO, put a dang bullet thru vitals at 2600 mv and ask the animal if it feels less sick. So many get caught up in mv - and in reality, all the above loads will kill game DEAD. Not shooting T-Rex.

Want a lot of speed? Shoot more Powder (a magnum class).....if you don't mind the blast, recoil, barrel wear, and expense. Really that simple.

Folks will say, Pressure = Velocity..........you can't have velocity w/o the pressure. Many variables affect...drop pressure i.e. throating.

Handloading is tailoring YOUR load to YOUR firearm. Books are a good reference.

Find accuracy, and enjoy! 2600 fps mv bullets do not bounce off game. If they do, let me know. 100 fps = 68 mph. To ME, who cares. Not game.

Last edited by 65BR; 05/21/18.
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,024
V
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
V
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,024
Pdman: I have been handloading for a long time and chronographing loads for nearly as long.
100 F.P.S. lower than "book" is nothing!
It could be due to a multitude of factors including THE RIFLE!
Also how far in front of the muzzle is the center of your chronographs readers?
There is a formula for figuring the loss in velocity from the muzzle to that mid-point then you add that loss (difference) to get true muzzle velocities (like the books show).
Anyway with that accuracy and that speed I would be quite happy.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,727
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,727
I have a AR 6.5 Grendel @6 3/4lbs scoped that will equal its speed with 125 Partitions with a 16"bbl..

Now you're talking. What load did you use for that?


What fresh Hell is this?
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385
Originally Posted by Kaleb
Originally Posted by HitnRun
This is what is wrong with the "bandwagon" 6.5 Creedmoor shooting. The cartridge was developed for long range shooting and a 140 grain Partition isn't a long range bullet. If you want Creedmoor performance, shoot long range with the stuff they designed for it. If you want to kill something, just use a 270 and a 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps and you will kill anything the Creedmoor will shoot at and within hunting distances, there will be no disappointment with a nearly 100 year old cartridge.


The creedmoor threads sure bring out stupid replies.

lol he's loading the wrong bullet so he should just shoot a 270 instead. Makes perfect sense.


It isn't about loading the wrong bullet there Einstein, it is about using the wrong cartridge for something it wasn't intended.


Originally Posted by RJY66

I was thinking the other day how much I used to hate Bill Clinton. He was freaking George Washington compared to what they are now.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,953
K
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
K
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,953


Factory 143 Hornady ELDX loads chrono at 2600 FPS so thinking I have a slow barrel.

Any one else chrono there Factory Hornady 143 Gr load in there 22" Tikka 6.5 Cr Moor if so post speed, or speed with comparable loads.
My other 22" 6.5 CM are quite a bit faster similar loads.


Tikka T3 X LH 6.5 Creed moor 22"



Speeds with other loads Hornady Brass

Fact Horn 6.5 Creed Moor Precision Hunter 143 ELDX 2600 FPS

42 Gr H 4350 143 Horn ELDX 2618 FPS Rem 9 1/2

42 GR RL 17 143 Horn ELDX 2677 FPS show pressure Max reduce Rem 9 1/2

41.8 Gr RL 16 143 Horn ELDX 2667 FPS show pressure Max reduce Rem 9 1/2

46.5 GR RL 26 143 Horn ELDX 2642 FPS Max show slight pressure signs CCI 200

42.5 GR RL 17 Barnes 127 GR LRX 2855 FPS Fed 215 Same speed as my other 22" Cr Moors?


kk alaska

Alaska 7 months of winter then 5 months of tourists
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 931
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 931
I get 2725-2750 w/R17 and 142 ABLR out of A7 24". 4350 did not produce nor did 143 ELDX. If you don't like the 2725+ level then try and get more velocity w/R26. Otherwise sell the thing and put us all out of the misery of this thread.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Originally Posted by elkaddict
Sometimes slow barrels just happen.. . . . . Slow barrels just happen sometimes....


Pretty much it in a nutshell.


I never thought I'd grow up to be a grumpy old man, but I did, and I'm killin' it.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,483
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,483
*

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

82 members (35, Bigd7378, Birdwatcher, 7mm_Loco, 12 invisible), 1,426 guests, and 844 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,060
Posts18,463,256
Members73,923
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.074s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8913 MB (Peak: 1.0443 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-23 09:14:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS