24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,022
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,022
Optics are so much better than they were just 20 years ago. Wal Mart special scope names, in particular Bushnell, now have some really great scopes - easy to zero, maintains zero, returns to zero, adjustments are accurate and repeatable and the glass on almost all scopes offered looks great in the daylight. Small differences, costing us thousands of dollars more to obtain, may not amount to anything more than 5 to 10 minutes of extra shooting time at dawn and dusk.

GB1

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 176
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 176
308 -
You owe it to yourself to look through a 6 x 42 Schmidt Bender. Doug has a sweet deal on a custom batch coming in from Germany. If you do enough searching S&Bs Hungary factory made are lower cost but I prefer the German made.

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,467
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,467
Originally Posted by rj308
Thanks for your responses. I will not be hunting driven boar with the K95, as I have dedicated rifles for that. I use the K95 for Roe deer and an occasional fox. I believe I will go with an illuminated reticle and a larger than 40mm objective and try to keep the weight under 20 oz. RJ


Have you looked at a 8x56 Docter? With a illuminated reticle, it weighs 550 grams.


I'm here to increase my social credit score and rub elbows with some of the highest rollers on the internet.
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,738
R
rj308 Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,738
DryPowder, yes I did. On their own website and most websites that sell them, the eye relief spec. I finally found a site that gave the eye relief and now I know why it is not listed on most sites. For the 8x56 and many other Docter scopes, the eye relief is 3". That's a no-go. All else is very good but the 3" eye relief just doesn't cut it for me. That scope was on my short list until I found that out. RJ

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 488
R
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
R
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 488
Originally Posted by bludog
You could be seeing a difference due to a slight upgrade in glass in the 6x42 vs the 36.

And to rj's question, if a Meopta 6x and a Zeiss Conquest 3-9 aren't giving you adequate low light performance, I'd expect you're going to have to spend a significant amount more to really see an improvement. My wife and I had an impromptu scope test while we were sitting on our front deck a couple of nights ago and saw a big doe about 300 yards away. She was not visible to the naked eye by the time we finished comparing scopes. We tested a 2-12 VX-6, a 3-9 Conquest and a 3-9 Trijicon Accupoint. The Accupoint came in last, the Zeiss and the VX-6 were about even with the final nod going to the Leupie due to the lit reticle. So, having no experience with any higher end glass than this, I'd suggest an illuminated reticle scope, maybe a VX-5 or 6. Good luck in your efforts.


My Leupold VX-6 2-12 fire dot is a vast improvement in low light from the VX-3's and VX-III's I had been using. So much that I picked up two more! I agree the fire dot is a handy feature.

IC B2

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,454
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,454
I have a 1-6 VX6 mounted on 3 hunting rifles. They are pretty amazing in low light. They are the brightest scopes I own. They are a huge difference over a VX3 to my eyes.

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,467
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,467
Originally Posted by rj308
DryPowder, yes I did. On their own website and most websites that sell them, the eye relief spec. I finally found a site that gave the eye relief and now I know why it is not listed on most sites. For the 8x56 and many other Docter scopes, the eye relief is 3". That's a no-go. All else is very good but the 3" eye relief just doesn't cut it for me. That scope was on my short list until I found that out. RJ


Some are 80mm, which is not surprising for a european scope. I believe the V6's are 95mm.


I'm here to increase my social credit score and rub elbows with some of the highest rollers on the internet.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,034
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,034
With 40mm objective scopes, you should really give a close look to Vortex Razor HD LH 2-10x40. It is a really nice design.

If you are having problems with reticle visibility, your best bet is an illuminated reticle design. There are not that many of these that are light weight, with Leupold doing some good things there, particularly in the VX-5HD line-up. 2-10x42 is very nice with a good reticle illumination in FIreDot guise. In terms of optics overall, I think I like Razor HD LH a litle more though.

Another interesting option Is Delta Titanium 1.5-9x45. The reticle is very visible and illumination is done well. I have not spent too much time with it yet, but I like what I am seeing so far. It may be a touch heavy for you, but it is a nice scope.

ILya

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,918
O
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,918
Originally Posted by rj308
There may not be such a scope that is light in weight and have good low light optics. I hunt Roe deer in Romania and mostly use my Blaser K95 in 270 Win in the mountains for this. During some times, like early season in May, the bucks come out real late. This rifle now has a Zeiss 3x9x40 Conquest and it is very nice to carry, I would rather not mount a very heavy (over 20 ounces) scope on it and destroy the fine handling qualities that this rifle was made for. In low light I tested a Leupold VX-2 and a Meopta Meopro 6x42 against the Conquest. Through these 70 year old eyes the Conquest barely beat out the VX-2 and the Meopta barely bettered the Conquest. By barely, I had to look through them 10 times to try to discern a difference. I have the #4 reticle in the Meopta and the fine center cross hairs of it disappear when you can still see the Duplex type cross hairs of the Leupold and Zeiss.
What do you guys think about the Leupold VXR 3x9x50? The weight would be about the same as the Conquest, "should" be better in low light and it has an illuminated reticle. I would like to hear from those that have had experience with this scope and I would like other suggestions that might work for me. Thanks, RJ

I don’t have that exact scope, but I do have a Leupold VX-R 3-9x40 with the Ballistic Firedot reticle (their item number 111236). I got it because I wanted an illuminated reticles for hunting in western Washington after I went on the hunt described here: https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/11623852/First_Elk,_First_Roosevelt

This scope has a 30mm tube, actual magnification is 3.3x-8.6x, and the optical quality, smoothness of operation, and precision are typical for Leupold.

Reticle dimensions are about right for a hunting scope designed for use in low light. The dot is 1 MOA at 8.6x and 2.5 MOA at 3.3x. It appears as a short red vertical line, not as a circle or square. It’s bright enough to see in daylight on low settings. I wear glasses and I have astigmatism so the dot flares on the brighter settings. This is not a flaw in the scope; reducing the brightness fixes it. It’s hard to find truly dark situations around here since I’m in a major West Coast city, but the dimmest settings would probably be fine in very low light.
• The horizontal crosswire tapers from a fairly heavy base to the same thickness as the dot, which could pose a challenge for hitting very small targets past about 100 yards.
• The circle’s interior diameter is 4.4 MOA at 9x.
• The circle’s line width is 0.4 MOA at 9x.
• The distance from the dot to the top of the circle is 2.19 MOA at 9x.
• The distance from the dot to the bottom of the circle is 2.19 MOA at 9x.
• The distance from the dot to the middle hash mark is 4.8 MOA at 9x.
• The distance from the dot to the lowest hash mark is 7.82 MOA at 9x.

I tested this scope on a couple of rifles including a Tikka 30-06. The only ammo I had in bulk was Greek DCM ammo loaded for the M-1 Garand, but it averages 1.3 MOA in this rifle and shot better than I expected all the way out to 400m (437 yards). With this load, the bottom of the circle worked as a POA at 300m (328 yards), and POI was just barely below the middle hash mark at 400m. It was easy to get hits on 6” steel targets at both ranges, even when the barrel got hot—I even had no trouble hitting a gong partially concealed in the grass—but I couldn’t hit anything beyond that. This is not the fault of the scope or the ammo, but of the shooter. I need to firm up my zero and shoot some paper between 400 and 500m to figure out the drops.

Conclusions
• The Leupold VX-R 3-9x40 is a good scope. I wanted an illuminated reticle and some ranging ability, which I got just not in the manner that Leupold implied or advertised. That said, I respect the Ballistic Firedot’s ranging properties. I still haven’t figured out the 500m holdover, but I’ll get there.
• I’ll hunt with the power ring at the low end. If I have time to assume a solid position for a long shot, then I’ll push it to the high end. I’ve hunted with 4x scopes for nearly 40 years, including a lot of close fast shots in the dripping forests of western Washington and very long shots in open country on the Edwards Plateau in Texas. I just don’t see using the middle of the range much.
• The Ballistic Firedot is a decent general-purpose reticle once you figure it out and get the right zero. Most experienced shooters would choose something more versatile (like the Leupold TMOA) for regular use in very open country or anywhere that the wind is a problem.

The 3-9x50 might be better for really low light, but I can't say from experience.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you have questions.


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,451
H
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,451
Hi Ron,

Horia has that older Zeiss 6x42 with a German 1 that came on that .243. The glass was still was nice to my eyes and that reticle might not disappear on you ... How does that look to your eyes?

When I lived in Sweden a lot of our boar hunting from stand was done at night with a Zeiss Diavari(?) 1.5-6x42 illuminated. It was a nice fit on the K95 in 6.5x55 and Heym SR30 in 30-06. We took many pigs in the pitch black of early winter before the snows came. Many a roebucks also fell in those last few minutes where lesser scopes or non-illuminated models would have not performed as well.

For the money I think the mentioned VXR might be a safe bet but I would personally look for second hand - higher end illuminated Euro glass.


Semper Fi



IC B3

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

704 members (10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 12344mag, 10gaugemag, 06hunter59, 1234, 71 invisible), 3,526 guests, and 1,192 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,271
Posts18,467,379
Members73,925
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.115s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8501 MB (Peak: 0.9623 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 02:06:28 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS