24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Yes sir its a 308 win.

Rifle as show is 6 pounds 3 oz=99oz

99 oz- 22 oz for scope rings and rail is 77 oz

77 oz-12 oz for suppressor and you get 65 oz.

65 oz is 4 pounds 1 oz for the rifle itself a smaller hole in the barrel would likely add a couple of oz in a 6.5 but still be under 4.25 pounds bare rifle.

Busting milk jugs at 400 yards and 10" gong at just beyond 500 last week was pretty darn fun and thus far I haven't broken the little 16 oz weaver and it seems to track true and I know its 5.5 MILs up from the bottom to my 100 yards zero....so kinda a built in zero stop if you will. smile For me and hunting its a 400 yard and in rifle which has been plenty for my hunting style and uses. It wasn't until last year when I routinely was helping folks take animals at 400+ with other rifles.

GB1

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,735
Daveh Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,735
How did you knock off almost a full pound ???


But as for me and my house we will serve the Lord. Joshua 24:15
I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Phil. 4:13

I DON'T NEED A WSM AS I HAVE A WEATHERBY!
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
This isn’t even my lightest one. My other rifle is less than 3.6 pounds bare.

This article explains how I get them down to the weight. But the easiest way is MPI micro light stocks knocks 12 oz off right out of the gate.

http://www.rokslide.com/uberlight-kimber-rifle-build/

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 638
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 638
Originally Posted by alaska_lanche
Nice looking rifle there GTScotty!!

I went down the same road with the Kimber Montana and Suppressor. 6.2 pounds even with 22 oz of scope, rings/rail and scope caps cover, and yet another 12 oz for the suppressor. wink

[Linked Image]

Def not opposed to the extra weight out front, the less noise, and recoil reduction. The haters will say it looks bad though, but its all function over form for me. smile

Have run it out to 500 yards a few times which is all the further I care to shoot this setup as it is.



Thanks, same you you. The article on Rokslide about your ultralights was really interesting, a 3.6 lb .358 Win has got to be punishing!

Is your Ultra 7 in the picture above direct threaded or brake mounted? I kind of want an Ultra 7 6.5 CB to use on my 6.5s and precision ARs, but the bore of 1/2x28 brake is sized for .224"... Bummer.

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
The 358 win isn't actually too bad. Its ported and the heaviest loads I shoot are 2600 fps with 200TTSX and 2400 with 225 NPTs. The 158 CE raptors at 2800 fps are plenty fine. Also keep in mind that is 3.6 pounds before optics. Its like 4.3 pounds scoped. wink

As far as the brake yeah its direct thread. Basically the CB mount is welded inside. That way I don't have to buy a CB mount for every rifle I have. A simply bushing up from 1/2X28 to 5/8X24 and I use it on my .223 without issue. Yeah I am not doing mag dumps with it but it works just fine and is plenty quiet that way.

IC B2

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,062
V
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
V
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,062
Originally Posted by alaska_lanche
This isn’t even my lightest one. My other rifle is less than 3.6 pounds bare.

This article explains how I get them down to the weight. But the easiest way is MPI micro light stocks knocks 12 oz off right out of the gate.

http://www.rokslide.com/uberlight-kimber-rifle-build/



I have one headed to MPI this month for a micro lite stock. 6x45 modest recoil even a low 4# rifle.


“There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don’t care who gets credit.” R. Reagan
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,550
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,550
Do the newest production Montanas still have the QC issues that need to be addressed outta the box?

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

250 members (358WCF, 1_deuce, 10gaugemag, 338reddog, 280shooter, 204guy, 35 invisible), 1,961 guests, and 1,168 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,492
Posts18,452,156
Members73,901
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.082s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8251 MB (Peak: 0.9167 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-18 05:09:20 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS