In the rear. That's a VX-II 4-12 and IME they have a load of eye relief. A front extended base that would make the present rear one usable would move the scope too close. Unless he's from the JeffO & Ingwe school of scope mounting.
In the rear. That's a VX-II 4-12 and IME they have a load of eye relief. A front extended base that would make the present rear one usable would move the scope too close. Unless he's from the JeffO & Ingwe school of scope mounting.
So which system should I get to have the right eye relief comfortably with this scope?
For the way I hold a rifle I'd need something that moves the rear base forward. I'm not a fan of the windage adjustable bases/rings. I'd put a rail base on it and get the rings right where I want them.
I called the local gun shop and they do have Leupold 50022 in store. So I went there but I found out the ring I have are the median ring, and the optic was too close to the barrel and the rear of the scope will interfere with the bolt action. So I got the Leupold extended high rings. Now it works just well.
Do you have to crawl up on the stock? Scope looks a little far forward. I realize it cannot go back any more. I would put a rail mount on it AS MATHMAN SAID and put the rings in the middle of the scope and where it comes up naturally without crawling up on the stock for a full FOV.
Faith and love of others knows no mileage nor bounds. That's simply the way it is. dogzapper
After the game is over, the king and the pawn go into the same box. Italian Proverb
Do you have to crawl up on the stock? Scope looks a little far forward. I realize it cannot go back any more. I would put a rail mount on it AS MATHMAN SAID and put the rings in the middle of the scope and where it comes up naturally without crawling up on the stock for a full FOV.
Not really. I like to pull the rifle really tight against my shoulder, plus it's 30-06, I have to pull it tight. So the scope is not too far from my eye. The eye relief is about 4 inches from my gross estimate.