|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
I’m looking at one that was apparently made in Germany and was wondering if they are a good scope?
Thanks
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,377
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,377 |
S&B is one of the premiere manufacturers of alpha optics. What specifically did you want to know?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,768
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,768 |
Excellent scope. Bright image, tracks and maintains adjustments great. Heavy,large scope with somewhat short eye relief. Have had a few and would strongly consider one again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
The guys wants $700 Canadian for it. Right now I’m using a FX-3 6x42, would the S&B be much of an improvement?
Would it weigh much more than my Leupold?
Last edited by harv3589; 07/28/18.
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,697
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,697 |
Take a look at the Meopta 6x42. A little cheaper; still a superb scope. Bob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,900 |
The guys wants $700 Canadian for it. Right now I’m using a FX-3 6x42, would the S&B be much of an improvement?
Would it weigh much more than my Leupold?
The S&B would be a great improvement in my opinion.
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 176
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 176 |
Copy That - They are both light. Bender reticle normally etched in glass not wires, easy on your eyes and a couple of the S and B reticles are very sweet. Love their A7 in the 6 x 42.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,377
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,377 |
Right now I’m using a FX-3 6x42, would the S&B be much of an improvement?
You may not notice much difference in good daylight, but when the light is low or the conditions bad, there is no comparison. The S&B will have superior resolution and provide a vivid, detailed image that is a significant step up from the Leupold.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
More reliable than my Leupold?
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383 |
More reliable than my Leupold? Hard to say because after all scopes are manmade. The probability of a S&B failure is very very low. I am kicking around the same scope for my 30-06 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 663
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 663 |
Right now I’m using a FX-3 6x42, would the S&B be much of an improvement?
You may not notice much difference in good daylight, but when the light is low or the conditions bad, there is no comparison. The S&B will have superior resolution and provide a vivid, detailed image that is a significant step up from the Leupold. Listen to this guy. I just picked up a S&B Klassik 2.5-10x56 at the info Bobby gave me. Although not the scope your currently looking at, the glass is amazing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758 |
I use both the FX3 and Klassik 6x42's and like them both. The FX3 is light, good glass, and GREAT user characteristics like eye relief/eye box....it's just super easy to get behind. The FX3's may take multiple shots to change point of impact on adjustments but once set I've not had any of them loose zero that I'm aware of. The Klassik is about a 1/4 pound heavier, has GREAT glass, but has shorter eye relief and is more finicky than the Leupold on how easy it is to get behind (but it's still good with a large exit pupil). The two Klassik's I have have been perfect in adjustments when sighting in.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,752
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,752 |
Are we talking about the 1" or 30mm here, and does it matter much?
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758 |
I was referencing 1" Klassiks in my post. I don't have any experience with the 30mm 6x42 Klassik.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,752
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,752 |
Going price for either appears to be about $1279, except for an outfit called OpticsTrade, IIRC, who wants $799, but you have to wait a month. Pretty big difference, if they're genuine, and if they really will get you one.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383 |
Are we talking about the 1" or 30mm here, and does it matter much? 30MM and 1279 is a good price for it . Optics Trade and I have not seen the ad might be selling a HUngarian made one which is a good deal since it is the same scope
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,720
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,720 |
I have one mounted on my BLR for a fall moose hunt. Have the 4x and 1-6x42, great lowlight transmission.
|
|
|
|
554 members (007FJ, 160user, 10gaugemag, 1lesfox, 1Longbow, 11point, 48 invisible),
2,564
guests, and
1,221
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,360
Posts18,468,975
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|