|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9 |
Can someone please share Swift's reload data for both A-frames and Sciroccos (both 225 grain) utilizing Alliant RL19 powder.... Alliant's website provides very few examples... Thank you...
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." (Albert Einstein, 1879 - 1955)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,157
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,157 |
The Swift Manual #1 shows 65.1g of RL-19 at 2465fps and 70g at 2715fps from a 24" barrel.
This is for the A-Frame
Last edited by Just a Hunter; 03/27/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715 |
Wow, quite a difference between Swift data and Speer data. Speer has 74 to 78 grains for a max velocity of 2944 fps. Granted it's for different bullets but still I'm surprised the Speer bullet is able to get 229 fps more than the same weight Swift A Frame.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9 |
Thanks for all of the replies.... I thought I read somewhere that there are higher pressures generated with the A-Frames compared to other similar weight bullets.....something to do with with the metal composition of the outer cup..... which would explain the need for less powder for similar weights.... Glad I asked as I'm VERY new to reloading and a little nervous at this time Thanks again....
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." (Albert Einstein, 1879 - 1955)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 715 |
Yeah, well different max powder charges for different bullets makes sense but I'd still think you should be able to get similar velocity with either bullet, since more pressure should correlate to more velocity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075 |
Guys, Be vary careful when using this data and drop several grains back. This is not intended to slander the data which will be fine "FOR THAT BULLET" which is short, with a small bearing surface. I found it could take powder charges up to 5 grains more that the 225gn Partition as a comparison because of that small bearing surface. It was relatively easy to top 2900fps and come close to 3000fps in my paddle stocked Ruger of the day, but the old adage of start low and work up is prudent with using Speer Data that is applied to this bullet. Let me repeat, this data is for the Speer 225gn Boat Tail bullet. John
When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 246
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 246 |
I know I'm late for this post but I have loaded for the 210gr Swift Sirocco II and found that do to longer bearing space and different jacket metal that Swift bullets develop high pressure quickly and powder charges should never be shared from other manufactured bullets.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,251
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,251 |
I've had the same experience with Swift 225 gr. A frames generating higher pressure in my 338 as well. I shoot the 225 Gr. Nosler Partition. When I tried working up a load with the same weight A frame I ran into pressure signs long before I reached the same powder charge as the partition.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,413
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,413 |
I shoot 74.0 grains with my 225 grain North Forks in my 1968 Sako, Bofors steel. The NF obviously has much less bearing surface than the Swift. I took it up to 76 grains with zero issues, but she showed a strong preference for 74, getting right at 2800 fps. Because of the differences in bearing surfaces, I’d certainly heed Aussie’s suggestions.
You only live once, but...if you do it right, once is enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,499
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,499 |
Thanks for all of the replies.... I thought I read somewhere that there are higher pressures generated with the A-Frames compared to other similar weight bullets.....something to do with with the metal composition of the outer cup..... which would explain the need for less powder for similar weights.... Glad I asked as I'm VERY new to reloading and a little nervous at this time Thanks again.... Yes, the A-Frame's drag through the rifling seems to be greater than other bullets. Maybe if Swift added more grooves to the A-Frame, then velocity could be increased. But as it is now, just follow the Switft reloading data. The Swift factory loads with the 210-grain Scirocco (tipped) is a little over 2,800 fps. Probably because of the same reasons, all A-Frame bullets are loaded by Swift's data around 75 fps slower than other bullets. For example, below 2,600 fps for the .338, 250-grain A-Frame. It is the same for all other cartridges.
Last edited by Ray; 08/30/18.
|
|
|
|
652 members (10gaugeman, 1minute, 12344mag, 1_deuce, 1eyedmule, 1beaver_shooter, 67 invisible),
3,061
guests, and
1,290
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,701
Posts18,456,774
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|