|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
So, I was given a gift certificate for a local camera store by the parents of our cross country team for taking and sharing photos for the season. Not why I take them but it was a really nice gesture. So my question is, what would be the best to upgrade? Lens or body?
Current body: Canon 7D (purchased used from a 'Fire member), Rebel T3i
Current lenses: Canon 18-135 STM, Canon 18-135 USM, Canon 50mm STM f1.8, Canon 24mm f2.8, Canon 70-300 USM II
I mostly do sports (T&F and cross country, landscape and wildlife). I don't do a lot of indoor sports, a couple of indoor track meets each year. I have rented the Canon 70-200 IS f2.8 for such events in the past
Thinking that it makes the most sense to upgrade my body, possibly to the 7D Mk II. Not interested in changing brands at this point. I am happy with Canon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000 |
I’d buy a new lens, the Canon 100-400 USM f/4.5-5.6 is an excellent lens and would compliment your current lenses.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
I have used that lens a couple of times, it is a very nice lens, I agree. I borrowed one for a trip to Africa this summer. Also used it for the state track meet, where you can not get as close to the track as you can at other meets
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 608
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 608 |
The most important question, what is the budget? Your camera is an excellent camera. The 70-200 F4 IS is an awesome lens as is the Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 at a very reasonable price. The Tamron allows you to take amazing pictures in low light and the results are fantastic. I have no skin in the game and these are very honest suggestions Feel free to contact me at joel cameralandny.com with any questions
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
Budget is $2000 and under. I have rented some fast zooms (Canon 70-200 II and Canon EFS - 17-55 f2.8) when doing some indoor shooting. I have read that the 7D MkII has improved AF and handles higher ISO better than the 7D. I rented a Canon 70-200 f4 IS for a outdoor XC meet and I am not sure that I could tell any difference in IQ from my 70-300 NanoUSM in that setting
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
Not so many missed photos but I know that I have missed photos with the 7D in sports. Now, some of that is certainly my skill level. But in watching some of the videos and reading articles on the Mk II, it does have a more accurate AF system and exposure compensation is better. Also seems to have a better capability in low light. I like to get by without a flash, when I can, even if I have to bump up the ISO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
I agree that the 100-400 Canon is a wonderful lens. Right at the edge of my price range, I think. I took one to Namibia this summer that I was able to borrow from a friend. Some really nice results.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450 |
Last edited by ChrisF; 11/01/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450 |
Imgur softened them up a bit. Guessing Smugmug did same to yours.
What are you hoping to gain out of the upgrade?
Last edited by ChrisF; 11/01/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,123
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,123 |
Imgur softened them up a bit. Guessing Smugmug did same to yours.
I have noticed that images on Smugmug get softened unless they are set to view at original size.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
Probably looking to gain a bit more IQ. I have shot XC and track meets with the 70-300 and been happy. I agree that the 100-400L is a great lens and probably a good choice if I decide to do more wildlife as it would increase the reach. Would put me right up to my budget threshold but I know that many say that the glass is more important than the body.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
Here is a shot with the 70-300 from the 7D
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
Here is one with the 100-400 and the 7D
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,450 |
I'd love to see your images at full resolution to compare the images between lenses. Failing that I'd suggest you take a critical look at your images shot with your existing lenses and those shot with the L glass. If when you pixel peek you can't see a clear difference in the resolution, then I'd say there might be some gains to be had with improving technique. If you can see the difference and you feel the spend is worth the difference you're seeing, then you have your answer. I've seen great images posted with the bodies that you already have. I personally wait for a quantum leap before popping on new bodies. I shot a 1D mk2N for a long time in the face of the Mark III and Mark IV being available (toward the end, I did feel hampered by the high ISO performance).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
I guess I would have to say that I am not one to pixel peek. Not even really sure how you do it? Anyway, I have enough saved that I could do both a new 7D MkII and the Tamron 70-200 G2 or the Canon 100-400 II. Leaning towards the body and lens, as far as a bang for the buck.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
Ended up with enough on the gift certificates to go with a new 7D Mk II body and Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2. Have not really had a chance to use them much yet.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,908
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,908 |
I really need to start deciding on a new body, and a way to pay for it My D800 bought new in 2012 is near enough 190,000 shutter count. She is beat up, flash sync terminal cover is gone. The release mode dial lock release took a hard hit a couple of years back and free wheels now. Camera doesn't fire I check to see where it has stopped. The rubber textured has worn smooth. It has started deciding on its on that the lens is set at f/1.8. But she still works and outs out some of the best tones and hues. She is going to give up one day. I better start getting ready.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,453 |
Lots of good choices out there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,499
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,499 |
What I do is to keep an eye on some of the older Canon L lenses that are the most appreciated by photographers, lenses that are "previous" models, or without IS. For example, The EF 200mm f/2.8 L II (black color with the red ring up front) is relatively cheap, quite fast, and sharp. The same for the older 135mm f/2 L. The 100mm non-IS Macro is also very sharp, and well as the 400mm L without IS. Some of these lenses aren't produced any longer, but still sold at Adorama and B&H. yes, it's nice to have the newer lenses with IS, but I just used a tripod-if needed-with the older lenses. This is a good place to find information about Canon lenses and cameras: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=42034
Last edited by Ray; 11/18/18.
|
|
|
|
607 members (1234, 12344mag, 10Glocks, 17CalFan, 10gaugemag, 007FJ, 71 invisible),
2,660
guests, and
1,260
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,667
Posts18,455,907
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|