Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Canada BC outfitter sues

Wait 'til we file suit for back rent for all those centuries the First Nations have been squatting on our land.

(I stole that concept from some movie- I think with James Garner in it....).

we have seen more Griz here since that ban. the number shot dosen't make the difference in the encounters between man and bear, it is the awareness on the bears side that he could be shot that makes him shy away from a confrontation.
the black bear is hunted hard here, and when you see one it is usually just his butt going into timber fast. the Griz we see here just stand and look at you like you are a butchers cut chart.

We are seeing a few more grizzlies in recent years anyway and I doubt the ban has much to do with it. Let's face it, there was not much opportunity for grizzly hunting anyway. In addition, if a grizzly is a problem, it will get shot, just as always. Nonetheless, I do believe the bears should be hunted. The reason grizzlies act as they do has nothing to do with the ban, They don't read or watch TV. GD

Yep, a bullet hole right between the running lights will send the great spirit on to inhabit something else.

Thing is, the outfitter is suing for money. Not for the grizz hunt to be reinstated just for money for his perceived lost business. The suit will do SFA to help anything but his bank account and nothing to bring back the grizzly hunt not that I blame him at all for this tactic. A suite to reinstate the hunt I could get behind, this one, meh.