24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 33,809
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 33,809
Originally Posted by sportingspecialist
I don't understand how the court has jurisdiction over the military,given that the president is the Command-in-chief.

Where did the court derive this authority?


Discrimination, civil rights laws.
As CIC, could the President order no Blacks in the Military, or would that be a violation of law?


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
BP-B2

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 33,809
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 33,809
Originally Posted by Bristoe
It says in the article that Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented.

I doubt that she was capable of forming an opinion. But here's the 4 justices who dissented.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan

What do 3 of them have in common?


They are alive.


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 44,465
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 44,465
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Trannys are gross.


Boomer,

I kinda liked the 5 speed with a splitter in the Mack truck I used to drive.

Geno


The desert is a true treasure for him who seeks refuge from men and the evil of men.
In it is contentment
In it is death and all you seek
(Quoted from "The Bleeding of the Stone" Ibrahim Al-Koni)

member of the cabal of dysfunctional squirrels?
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,510
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,510
The fact that this is an actual legitimate issue for discussion would suggest that the canary in the coal mine has expired and we're just not paying attention.

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,108
J
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
J
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,108
Originally Posted by Stickfight
A good illustration of the duplicity of the left is their wanting to prevent mentally ill civilians from owning firearms and at the same time force the military to give them access to implements of war.

Perhaps their goal isn’t really about guns, or trannies, or the military at all.



Good point.


Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.

A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.

"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".

I Dindo Nuffin
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,306
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,306
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by sportingspecialist
I don't understand how the court has jurisdiction over the military,given that the president is the Command-in-chief.

Where did the court derive this authority?


Discrimination, civil rights laws.
As CIC, could the President order no Blacks in the Military, or would that be a violation of law?



That's not an answer.


"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." **Edmund Burke**

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." **Benjamin Franklin**
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 44,465
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 44,465
Originally Posted by sportingspecialist
Originally Posted by Valsdad
sporting,

in a way he did answer your question.

SCOTUS is there to rule on the Constitutionality of actions by the Congress and the Executive branches. Checks and balances, pretty good design so far in our history, perhaps flawed at times, but better than a monarchy/oligarchy, no?

Would it be OK if the CIC didn't like men with black hair, freckles, and blue eyes (an Irishman perhaps) and refused to allow them to serve? The Supremes would likely overrule that command.

Geno



Perhaps you could illustrate your point with a quote from the Constitution.

Please don't cite the Marbury v Madison decision.

It appears to me that the Court has usurped power they were never intended to possess.



Well, for one thing the Executive branch asked the Court to look into the matter:

from the article you posted

Quote
The Trump administration first petitioned the Supreme Court to decide directly on the legality of the trans-soldiers ban, after federal trial judges in California, Washington, D.C., and Washington state issued orders prohibiting its enforcement. The plaintiffs in those lawsuits argue the policy violates a range of constitutional rights including the First Amendment, equal protection, and due process.
(my bold)

Notwithstanding the Constitution:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii

Quote
Section 2.

The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution,
(my bold)

Now, granted I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but the wording in those items I quoted seem to lead me to believe that first, Article III gives the Court broad jurisdiction, and second, that the Executive Branch, in this case, requested the Court to review this case.

In other cases have they usurped power? Perhaps.

This case? It doesn't appear so.

Geno


The desert is a true treasure for him who seeks refuge from men and the evil of men.
In it is contentment
In it is death and all you seek
(Quoted from "The Bleeding of the Stone" Ibrahim Al-Koni)

member of the cabal of dysfunctional squirrels?
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,108
J
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
J
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,108
Originally Posted by RufusG
The fact that this is an actual legitimate issue for discussion would suggest that the canary in the coal mine has expired and we're just not paying attention.


Who cares about a canary, or a constitution? wink


Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.

A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.

"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".

I Dindo Nuffin
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179


Son of a liberal: " What did you do in the War On Terror, Daddy?"

Liberal father: " I fought the Americans, along with all the other liberals."

MOLON LABE





Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172
Originally Posted by sportingspecialist
Originally Posted by Bristoe
It says in the article that Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented.

I doubt that she was capable of forming an opinion. But here's the 4 justices who dissented.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan

What do 3 of them have in common?




Bolshi.

They represent 2-3% of the population but 33% of the supreme court.

Let us also not forget that Kagan and Ginsburg presided over homosexual ceremonies but refused to recuse themselves for the Obergefell v. Hodges case.Kagan is a practicing homosexual.They have no honor or integrity.

Their always the first ones to whine and call for a justice or other official to recuse themselves.


Ashkenazis, same Bolshevik stock as Soros and the Rothschilds. Even Hitler was afraid of the Rothschilds and left them alone. ...Breyer, Kagan, and Ginsberg...


Hunt with Class and Classics

Religion: A founder of The Church of Spray and Pray

Acquit v. t. To render a judgment in a murder case in San Francisco... EQUAL, adj. As bad as something else. Ambrose Bierce “The Devil's Dictionary”







IC B3

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,306
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,306
Trump,like so many other individuals,believes a decision made by the Supreme Court becomes the law of the land.The legislative branch makes laws not the courts.So Trump's request to have this reviewed by the Supreme Court reflects his false belief that their decision becomes the law of the land.

That's a bad precedent to refer all executive decisions to the court for final resolution.

Perhaps you should review the Dred Scott decision and then tell me how righteous the Supreme Court was in that decision.


"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." **Edmund Burke**

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." **Benjamin Franklin**
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
693 members (12344mag, 10gaugemag, 160user, 10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 12308300, 59 invisible), 3,138 guests, and 1,268 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,742
Posts18,401,219
Members73,822
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.119s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8521 MB (Peak: 0.9632 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 14:03:16 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS