24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by Windfall
Exactly the reason that I bought the old proven low end torque last 5.4 in 2010 instead of the new 3.5 Ecoboost in a 2011. There's no replacement for displacement. My turbo Saab was fidgety fast while the turbo seals lasted, but they didn't.


I think Ford got the turbo and Ecoboost carbon issue solved with the 3rd generation engine. I don't think they will be offering V8 F150's in the future.

GB1

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,499
7
79S Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
7
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,499
Originally Posted by Oldelkhunter
Originally Posted by Windfall
Exactly the reason that I bought the old proven low end torque last 5.4 in 2010 instead of the new 3.5 Ecoboost in a 2011. There's no replacement for displacement. My turbo Saab was fidgety fast while the turbo seals lasted, but they didn't.


I think Ford got the turbo and Ecoboost carbon issue solved with the 3rd generation engine. I don't think they will be offering V8 F150's in the future.


They are on the 2 GEN of the 3.5 ecoboost introduced 2017. I have yet to see anything on a GEN 3 ecoboost.


Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.

Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by 79S
Originally Posted by Oldelkhunter
Originally Posted by Windfall
Exactly the reason that I bought the old proven low end torque last 5.4 in 2010 instead of the new 3.5 Ecoboost in a 2011. There's no replacement for displacement. My turbo Saab was fidgety fast while the turbo seals lasted, but they didn't.


I think Ford got the turbo and Ecoboost carbon issue solved with the 3rd generation engine. I don't think they will be offering V8 F150's in the future.


They are on the 2 GEN of the 3.5 ecoboost introduced 2017. I have yet to see anything on a GEN 3 ecoboost.


Under the impression the 2017 model year was change 3 , I might be wrong.

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278
L
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278
UPDATE

Did another flush.

Idle smoothed out, mileage back to 17.5


Lefty

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 264
S
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
S
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 264
I have the 2011 ecoboost with 100k+ miles with no problems. 18mpg running empty and 13mpg pulling. I would get a second opinion.

IC B2

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,676
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,676
My 2016 work van transit 350 has the Eco boost 1 ton loaded to near capacity daily 100K between 13-15 mpg average zero issues

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

567 members (1lesfox, 11point, 007FJ, 12344mag, 160user, 10gaugemag, 54 invisible), 2,924 guests, and 1,226 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,355
Posts18,468,899
Members73,931
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.133s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8204 MB (Peak: 0.8707 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 22:02:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS