|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,258
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,258 |
I'm considering this scope for one of my .22 rifles-mostly range. The majority of what I've read re this scope has been quite favorable. I did read that the eye box could be a bit more forgiving. For those of you that have experience with this specific scope, are you pleased? Issues? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20,824
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20,824 |
Mine wouldn't track. Customer service was excellent. Sent me a new scope in just a few days. New one tracks good. Lotsa features for the price
Originally Posted by Judman PS, if you think Trump is “good” you’re way stupider than I thought! Haha
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,096
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,096 |
where is the scope made. if its not japan, I wouldn't give it a plug nickel
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556 |
I have a Midas Tac that has been real good. The glass is clear and so far, with my limited dialing, it has been spot on. They are not a light scope, but that is not an issue for me. I am satisfied with it so far and have killed deer and antelope using the dialing, at over 400 yards. The customer service is indeed very good.
You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it. A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck. Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,714
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,714 |
I have the 6-24 Midas Tac on a Creedmoor and its been good so far. I've shot steel at 1,000 and the turrets track well and repeatable and the reticle matches same.
Despite my user name, no I am not from Texas.........
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556 |
I have the 6-24 Midas Tac on a Creedmoor and its been good so far. I've shot steel at 1,000 and the turrets track well and repeatable and the reticle matches same. That is the one that I have.
You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it. A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck. Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
|
|
|
|
664 members (1eyedmule, 1minute, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 1beaver_shooter, 10ring1, 63 invisible),
3,117
guests, and
1,268
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,698
Posts18,456,728
Members73,909
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|