Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire The “Whistleblowers” Are Deep State Spies

The whistleblowers are making it up after collaborating with Schiff. They are making memos, creating memos to themselves after having spied on Trump. Now, I mentioned earlier that there is a CIA technique called “a feedback loop.” Here it is explained last night on Chatsworth Osborne Jr. Live on the Fox News Channel. He’s got former State Department official Peter Van Buren on. Question: “Do we know more now than we did two weeks ago and enough to justify impeachment? Are you starting to think that this is a real story or not?”

VAN BUREN: No, it’s not. The second whistleblower is actually the source for the first whistleblower (chuckles), which means it’s all the same thing. Now, this is different than in the Kavanaugh case where they sent Michael Avenatti out to find additional victims wherever he could. But in fact, he’s simply the source for the first whistleblower. The CIA… This is an old trick. It’s called a feedback loop, and essentially what you do is you set up one of your sources to back up another source, and you make it appear that your initial source is more credible by feeding information into the loop. That’s what seems to be going on here. They’re repurposing a witness as a second whistleblower.

RUSH: So the second whistleblower is actually the first, is actually the original. The second whistleblower informs the first. The first whistleblower says what the second whistleblower is going to say, which feeds the loop! So when the second whistleblower surfaces, it “corroborates” what the first one says and adds credibility, ’cause, “Here’s two people that don’t know each other,” but they do. They’re working in concert. As Mr. Van Buren says here, it’s an old CIA trick called a feedback loop. Again, though, I’m as incredulous at this as I was over the Steele dossier.

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2019/10/08/the-whistleblowers-are-deep-state-spies/

I believe it , but we need bonified proof.

There is nothing to "whistleblow" here folks. We have all seen the summary transcript of the phone call. It had nothing in it that is even partly a problem for a governing president.

"Whistleblow" has no substance. It's a charade.

Sounds like a 2 man circle jerk to me...

But since two don't make a circle...

This right here. If they keep saying it enough most will forget it.

My thought is there is a lot more than just two useful idiots involved here.

Not a charade but a coup.

God, I wish Trump would declare martial law and turn the military loose on them. Demoncrap congress creatures, FBI, CIA, EPA, they all need a one way trip to Gitmo.

The entire vile subhuman demoncraps in congress are a part of it, I'm sure.

The initial WB received "2nd hand info" from????? Why none other than WB #2

Once Trump blew this up by releasing the transcript, Schiff etc had to bolster their flailing claim, so they then trot out WB #2 who has first hand info[listened to call].

Circle jerk indeed.