24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,890
2
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
2
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,890
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
It would be great if Phil actually had the time to respond here, but as I noted earlier this is the Alaskan bear season and he's out there, beyond the reach of the Internet, dealing with some of the biggest bears on earth.

I hesitate to put words in his mouth, but we've talked about this a lot--partly because Eileen and I have spent time up there with him, fishing and hunting birds during the peak of the salmon spawning season, when his part of the Alaskan Peninsula has (according to biologists) the highest concentration of brown bears in Alaska. In fact, we had some interesting encounters with brown bears during our time together--as have I with both browns and grizzlies elsewhere.

Based on all that, I suspect he would comment that those who suggest certain "stopping" bullets (and cartridges) for bears are FOS.

Or at the very least, have limited experence.


No more than one can handle........well

BP-B2

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,701
J
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,701
I bet most folks, having to deal with dangerous bears are NOT FOS afterward! ha

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,591
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,591
Originally Posted by JMR40
No personal experience. But there have been many people who have conducted these tests and they all came to the same conclusion. I've read comments by Phil Shoemaker here and read a good article by Finn Aagaard related to his bullet testing on African game. There used to be a good article online conducted by the Alaska F&G concerning their recommendation for large bear protection that I can no longer find. The 200 or 220 gr Partition in either 30-06 or 300 magnum gave the deepest penetration of any 30 caliber tested.

Aagaard and the Alaska F&G also tested many other cartridges. The 30-06 and 300 mag with those bullets tied in penetration and beat every other bullet and cartridge tested smaller than 375 mag. That included 338 WM, 35 Whelen, and 45-70. The Alaska F&G study recommended 30-06 with 200 or 220 gr bullets as the best choice for most people for bear defense. The 375 and larger magnum cartridges beat 30-06, but they felt the recoil could be an issue for some people and they felt the 30-06 was adequate.

I do not know if the study was pulled or not, but it is very dated. Many bullets in common use today were simply not available when those tests were run.


Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 390
C
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
C
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 390
Originally Posted by Trystan
When the bear continued to aggress I shot the bear in the head with a 270 and it immediately stopped moving.


Great post Trystan. Thanks for sharing this good first hand info. Question about the .270 though. Was it scoped? At what range did you shoot the bear in the head?

Having once killed a pig at a range of eight feet with a scoped .30-'06 I will admit to not having seen the pig very well.


All things are always on the move simultaneously. - W.S. Churchill
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,437
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,437
The only live grizzly I've seen was on a video done by a family friend. My wife and a lady friend were travelling in Western Canada by rental car to visit family members and saw many black bears. But there was this one occasion where they came across a silver tip grizzly sitting on its rump eating roots it had just dug from the ground. The lady friend wanted my wife to stop the car -- which she did -- she got out and onto the side of the ridge with the bear and videoed it from about twenty yards for 10 - 15 minutes. It was a beautiful bear that when finished eating it got up and walked on all fours away from the camera and disappeared into the bush.

My personal experience with bears are many as I've hunted them every season for thirty years, and probably taken my share. I wounded a couple over that period and had to do a follow-up -- but with two partners the following day on the first incident, and a single partner on the second incident with a decade in between. Both bears did the exact same thing: they spent the night in very thick bush with an open area within of about 30 to 50 sq-ft where they laid down watching their back trail. I personally discovered their hideaways with a patch of blood on the grass where they laid about the size of dinner plates. I carried a .45-70 with a bear load, but they each had left the scenes before we arrived and we never caught up with them. Both were wounded with .35-caliber rifles, a Whelen and a Rem Mag.

In my experience of killing bears with a single shot, none were CNS hits... and I've killed several this way: with a single heavy for caliber .458" through lungs, or lungs/heart. They dropped to the shot and never got up from that. Those were mostly from .45-70s and a few from .458 Win Mags. Yes, I've killed others using mid-bores, including the .35 Whelen and 9.3 x 62, but they all ran about 20 - 25 yards before dropping dead. Where I've hunted, 20 - 25 yards can mean over a cliff or down in a troublesome ravine, or worse -- into a swamp or bog.

Bob

www.bigbores.ca


"What shall it profit a man if he gain the whole world and lose his own soul" - Jesus

IC B2

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,890
2
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
2
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,890
Originally Posted by Jim_Knight
I bet most folks, having to deal with dangerous bears are NOT FOS afterward! ha


Good signature line......

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,017
V
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
V
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,017
Why not just use a 180 NP or 180 TSX, and know where it hit his at 15-20 yards.

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,179
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,179
i have a friend who has killed many bears in Alaska and some out west too he liked a 338 Win. Mag. much better for bears that charged him ,so he just always hunted with a 338 Win. Mag. he has had plenty combat experience too frontline wounded Viet Nam Marine vet. so a single animal running at him is easier .


LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,674
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,674
Originally Posted by ClearAirTurbulence
Originally Posted by Trystan
When the bear continued to aggress I shot the bear in the head with a 270 and it immediately stopped moving.


Great post Trystan. Thanks for sharing this good first hand info. Question about the .270 though. Was it scoped? At what range did you shoot the bear in the head?

Having once killed a pig at a range of eight feet with a scoped .30-'06 I will admit to not having seen the pig very well.


The 270 was scoped with a leupold 6X42 but I didn't use the scope. I was several feet from the bear when I pulled the trigger. The brush was thick and I had taken a different line thru the brush than Chuck and Steve so was slightly off to the side. As the bear lunged toward Chuck and Steve he landed in the brush right next to me. I stuck my barrel thru the brush less than a foot from the bears head and pulled the trigger.


Good bullets properly placed always work, but not everyone knows what good bullets are, or can reliably place them in the field
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,545
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,545
If memory serves, Phil Shoemaker said in one of his articles that the first stopping rifle he used was a 30-06 loaded with 200 grain Partitions.


NRA Endowment Life Member, G.O.A supporter
IC B3

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Originally Posted by Pahntr760

No mine is not, never had the experience. I will be moving to the last frontier next year and just may be in such a situation, I figure. I have seen how well Speer perform in various critters in my time in Utah, "punching above their weight" type comments are what I have heard/seen. It was just a suggestion after all.


Pahntr

Some here really like the Speer H C.

I want to honestly & sincerely encourage you to TEST the 200 gr HC
BEFORE you encounter any and ESPECIALLY an aggressive bear.

Your BACON depends on the bullet you choose.

I would NOT bet MY bacon on ANY cup/core bullet vs an angry bear.
Bullets are cheap >> maulings >> maimings >> hospitals >> funerals are NOT.

Good luck

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
Jerseyboy,

Actually, I doubt if Phil used the words "stopping rifle" but yes, he did start out as a brown bear guide with a .30-06 and 200-grain Partitions many years ago, because that was the rifle he had, and 200-grain Partition were, at the time, probably the deepest penetrating .30 caliber bullet.

The combination kept bears off him, but there were too many adventures involved, the reason Phil eventually bought the Mark X Mauser .458 Winchester Magnum that he turned into Old Ugly. It is still his favorite stopping rifle, despite him having used a bunch of other rifles and rounds, because it provides the right amount of power in a comparatively lightweight rifle.

Aside from reading Phil's writings (I have even published some in both magazines and on the Internet) one point he made was that the advantage of a "stopping rifle" wasn't that the cartridge was powerful enough to always stop, finally and forever, a charging brown bear with one shot. He has apparently never found such a round, despite experimenting for decades with cartridges up to and including the .505 Gibbs.

Instead what he found was that larger cartridges would often stop (or even drop) charging bears at least momentarily, even if the hit wasn't instantly fatal, providing time to get in another shot--often on a stunned and stationary bear, rather than a bear often running through thick brush. That was the flaw with the .505: While it stopped bears even with non-fatal hits, the heavy recoil made follow-up shots slower. All of which is why Old Ugly is still his favorite--and the rifle he took to Africa recently on his first Cape buffalo hunt.

He does prefer bullets that penetrate well, even at odd angles and through heavy bones, because you can't always count on a central nervous system hit on charging bears, especially in brush. Which is why he has experimented considerably with bullet penetration, once even on a dead whale that washed up on a nearby beach. During those experiments he found the 220-grain Nosler Partition penetrated deeper than any other .30 caliber bullet he tried, including monolithics. There's no doubt he would have used the 220 when he started in preference to the 200-grain Partition--but the 220 did not exist then. He did use 220 a few years ago when, for various reasons, he again ended up going after a wounded brown bear with a .30-06. It worked--but not like Old Ugly.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
This sounds like Mr. Shoemakers version of Taylors KO theory. Nothing wrong with the theory it just doesn't equate to a mathematical formula very well and like any other theory it is just a general rule.


"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,898
Taylor's KO numbers were supposedly based on the time an elephant remained "knocked out" by a bullet that narrowly missed the brain, though plenty of African PH's say they've found it to be BS.

Taylor also did not state in his most popular book, AFRICAN RIFLES AND CARTRIDGES, that his KO notion was based on solid, "bluff-nosed" bullets and heavy, thick-skinned game. His slightly earlier book BIG GAME AND BIG GAME RIFLES, also published in 1948, makes this point plainly. Despite that, many hunters somehow apply KO to all hunting cartridges and expanding bullets.

Phil's conclusions are not theories, but based on long experience with a wide variety of cartridges for stopping brown bears, using cartridges from the 9mm Parabellum to the .505 Gibbs. He did not try to convert them to a formula, as Taylor did. I've always wondered how many "knocked-out" elephants Taylor timed to see how long they took to wake up....


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,890
2
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
2
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,890
Talking about Knock Out.....John Buhmiller would load the first round base forward......
Wouldn’t feed from Magazine that way.....but gave him maybe 15 seconds while the elephant was stunned. He shot 155 and tested a lot of guns and cartridges. He necked up the 378 Weatherby to 45.......didn’t use it as the larger base gave him one fewer in the magazine.

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 390
C
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
C
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 390

These questions always seem to tie me up in knots. Should I go into the mountains with a rifle set up for hunting elk out to 400 yards or a rifle set up for stopping an aggressive bear at 10 feet?

One solution I've come up with is hunt with a partner. One of you carries the scoped elk rifle. The other carries an iron-sighted .458 with whatever bullet Phil Shoemaker uses. And you switch when the first guy gets his elk.


All things are always on the move simultaneously. - W.S. Churchill
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,211
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,211
Originally Posted by Jim_Knight
Anyone is welcome to chime in guys! smile


Not a bear guide, and never shot a bear either, that said, were I too take one of my 300 mags for big bear, they'd be loaded with the 220gr Nosler partitions, an easy 2750 fps would be more than enough, same/same for your elk in the timber thread.


Trump Won!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,298
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,298
Originally Posted by ClearAirTurbulence

These questions always seem to tie me up in knots. Should I go into the mountains with a rifle set up for hunting elk out to 400 yards or a rifle set up for stopping an aggressive bear at 10 feet?

One solution I've come up with is hunt with a partner. One of you carries the scoped elk rifle. The other carries an iron-sighted .458 with whatever bullet Phil Shoemaker uses. And you switch when the first guy gets his elk.



It's a similar issue here, needing a rifle which will work on a grumpy bear at five yards but also shoot a deer or goat at 300. On one end of things is a .458 and the other a .270. A .375 worked for years but about six years ago I settled on the 9.3x62 as my primary rifle. I'll happily give up the flatter trajectory of a .300 for better bear safety.

Last edited by pabucktail; 10/14/19.
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,701
J
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,701
What weight/style/make bullet do you normally use in your Mauser for an all around load? I have played with three different 9.3x62s, and I settled on the 286 Partition ( my SIL used Vortex ammo with 286 TSX) While I never killed anything with the Partition, it did shoot pretty flat, relative t the round nose. I used a 35 Whelen Ackley ( which, to me, is a much closer comparison to the 9.3x62) with the Woodleigh 310rn and was able to get a solid 2400fps. It was surprisingly flat shooting.

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,298
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,298
I've settled on the 286gr Nosler at 2400 from my 20.5" barrel. So far it's done fine on various deer, goats, and one big brown bear. I get 2525 with the 250gr Accubond but the 286s shoot fast enough for my trajectory needs and I firmly believe the 286 partition will penetrate more than any 250 grain bullet. That's not so say I don't think the 250 would work okay on a bear at spitting distance, I'm just happy to trade longer range for the better close range bear option.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
104 members (338reddog, 405joe, 7mm_Loco, 10gaugemag, 444Matt, 12 invisible), 1,350 guests, and 683 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,588
Posts18,397,869
Members73,815
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.084s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9037 MB (Peak: 1.0786 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 08:33:17 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS