24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
2
2500HD Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
2
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
Any one have any reloading data or experience with 7-08 and 168 Berger VLD Hunters. My rifle is a Custom Shop Remington 700 24” SS with I believe a 9.25 twist.
I have RL 26, 16,15,19,22, H380 H4350, Big Game, Varget, H4895, and few others on hand. Any help to start would be great. Thanks Ken.

Last edited by 2500HD; 01/14/20.
HR IC

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,936
D
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
D
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,936
Tag, trying the same combo this spring

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
Why so heavy? Velocity drops off dramatically from 150 to 160/162/168. BC increases but the bullets don’t catch up until 500 yards or farther.



P


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
2
2500HD Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
2
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
Gotcha. Every one seems to talk about going with Heavy now days. I guess I was marching in the parade lol. 150’s probably do better with my twist anyway. Thanks Pharmseller for making me look at this with a different approach.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,195
K
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
K
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,195
150g and 168g Nosler long range accubond loves to jump .120 or so, this works out perfect for the 7/08 and a short magazine. Get some Lapua brass, R#19 with cci 250 and stomp on the gas. I sort the LRAB by ogive length, and let me tell you, they knock the hell out of deer and hogs. We like real dead, real quick, and if you are the same, try these bullets. Jump these two LRAB bullets.

175gLRAB likes to be close to the lands, thus 280 and AI are excellent for this bullet. 7Rem mag shoots the 175 into bug holes with two powders, R#22 and R#26, 2850 and 3050 fps Respectively.

9 1/4" twist Remingtons shoot the 175g LRAB just fine.

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 36,822
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 36,822
Originally Posted by 2500HD
Gotcha. Every one seems to talk about going with Heavy now days. I guess I was marching in the parade lol. 150’s probably do better with my twist anyway. Thanks Pharmseller for making me look at this with a different approach.

Good info.

Don’t forget Big Game powder.

DF

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,936
D
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
D
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,936
Originally Posted by keith
150g and 168g Nosler long range accubond loves to jump .120 or so, this works out perfect for the 7/08 and a short magazine. Get some Lapua brass, R#19 with cci 250 and stomp on the gas. I sort the LRAB by ogive length, and let me tell you, they knock the hell out of deer and hogs. We like real dead, real quick, and if you are the same, try these bullets. Jump these two LRAB bullets.

175gLRAB likes to be close to the lands, thus 280 and AI are excellent for this bullet. 7Rem mag shoots the 175 into bug holes with two powders, R#22 and R#26, 2850 and 3050 fps Respectively.

9 1/4" twist Remingtons shoot the 175g LRAB just fine.


Thanks for the unsolicited advice with the worst bullet Nosler had ever produced. And I'm a huge Nosler fan.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,645
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,645
As mentioned, the 7mm-08 doesn't have the case capacity to really push the heavier bullets effectively (especially hunting bullets). I have two 7mm-08's, one that I use for deer and the other for shooting steel/paper. I stick with 140's in the hunting rifle, and shoot 150-168's in the heavy barrel rifle. I've seen some pretty good numbers with Winchester 6.5 StaBall powder, Hodgdon lists it at over 2700fps with 168's...may be worth trying some out. You have plenty of barrel length, but I just don't see the point using such a heavy bullet when there are comparable bonded bullets that will perform pretty well in the 140-150gr weight.

That being said, my next 7mm bullet will be 500 of the Nosler 168gr 2nds Custom Competition HPBT's. Not so much for the weight, but because they are reasonably cheap at $20/100.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Why so heavy? Velocity drops off dramatically from 150 to 160/162/168. BC increases but the bullets don’t catch up until 500 yards or farther.



P

“Catch up” in what way?

IC B3

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Originally Posted by Jason280
As mentioned, the 7mm-08 doesn't have the case capacity to really push the heavier bullets effectively...

What do you mean by “effectively”?

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,645
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,645
Seems self explanatory, but to propel the bullet fast enough to really justify the extra weight (and without using longer barrel lengths, or seating the bullets to a a longer OAL in a long action receiver).

Look at the ballistics, and compare the Sierra MK's in 150 (0.429 BC) & 168gr (0.490) bullets. With a MV of 2800fps, the 150's are 1515 fps at 1400 yards with 12.2 mils of drop. The 168's, at 2700fps, are 1575 fps at the same distance with 12.4 mils of drop. Even stepping up to the 168gr Nosler CC bullets, which publish a BC of .520, the velocity is 1631 fps with 12 mils drop. Between the three, drop and velocity is again virtually indistinguishable at 500 yards. My long range "fun" rifle is a 22" 7mm-08, and my initial thought process was to run the 162/168s for 600-1k yards...but outside of the cheaper price of Nosler 2nds, there is no reason in my short action 7mm-08 to shoot the heavier bullets (unless shooting subsonics suppressed).

Of course, all of this is irrelevant with regards to hunting bullets. Hunters have been using the 7x57 for years with heavies at slower velocities for damn near a century, killing virtually every game animal on the planet.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Why so heavy? Velocity drops off dramatically from 150 to 160/162/168. BC increases but the bullets don’t catch up until 500 yards or farther.



P

“Catch up” in what way?



Velocity.


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,257
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,257
Wind drift?

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Originally Posted by Jason280
Seems self explanatory, but to propel the bullet fast enough to really justify the extra weight (and without using longer barrel lengths, or seating the bullets to a a longer OAL in a long action receiver).

Look at the ballistics, and compare the Sierra MK's in 150 (0.429 BC) & 168gr (0.490) bullets. With a MV of 2800fps, the 150's are 1515 fps at 1400 yards with 12.2 mils of drop. The 168's, at 2700fps, are 1575 fps at the same distance with 12.4 mils of drop. Even stepping up to the 168gr Nosler CC bullets, which publish a BC of .520, the velocity is 1631 fps with 12 mils drop. Between the three, drop and velocity is again virtually indistinguishable at 500 yards. My long range "fun" rifle is a 22" 7mm-08, and my initial thought process was to run the 162/168s for 600-1k yards...but outside of the cheaper price of Nosler 2nds, there is no reason in my short action 7mm-08 to shoot the heavier bullets (unless shooting subsonics suppressed).

Of course, all of this is irrelevant with regards to hunting bullets. Hunters have been using the 7x57 for years with heavies at slower velocities for damn near a century, killing virtually every game animal on the planet.

The heavier bullet catches up in velocity well before either has dropped to a level where bullet expansion is questionable (sub-500 yards, depending on the specific bullets and launch speeds), which means that the light bullet will reach minimum expansion velocity at a lesser distance. Additionally, there's not enough difference in elevation between the two bullets to matter (0.1-0.3 MRAD difference), since you'll be dialing for either bullet beyond the PBR (which only differs by a handful of yards, again depending on specific bullets and launch speeds), and beyond about 600 meters the heavier bullet drops less than the lighter bullet. Finally, the heavier bullet has less wind drift right from the muzzle and only continues to drift less and less as distance increases. So how exactly can the 7-08 not propel the heavier bullet fast enough to justify the extra weight? I see plenty of justification where it counts.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,395
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,395
Originally Posted by Jason280
Seems self explanatory, but to propel the bullet fast enough to really justify the extra weight (and without using longer barrel lengths, or seating the bullets to a a longer OAL in a long action receiver).

Look at the ballistics, and compare the Sierra MK's in 150 (0.429 BC) & 168gr (0.490) bullets. With a MV of 2800fps, the 150's are 1515 fps at 1400 yards with 12.2 mils of drop. The 168's, at 2700fps, are 1575 fps at the same distance with 12.4 mils of drop. Even stepping up to the 168gr Nosler CC bullets, which publish a BC of .520, the velocity is 1631 fps with 12 mils drop. Between the three, drop and velocity is again virtually indistinguishable at 500 yards. My long range "fun" rifle is a 22" 7mm-08, and my initial thought process was to run the 162/168s for 600-1k yards...but outside of the cheaper price of Nosler 2nds, there is no reason in my short action 7mm-08 to shoot the heavier bullets (unless shooting subsonics suppressed).

Of course, all of this is irrelevant with regards to hunting bullets. Hunters have been using the 7x57 for years with heavies at slower velocities for damn near a century, killing virtually every game animal on the planet.


The 7mm 168 VLD has a G1 BC of .618, not .490
Makes a big difference.


“There are some who can live without wild things and some who cannot.”
ALDO LEOPOLD
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
2
2500HD Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
2
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
So I still may try the Berger VLD 168’s. Does anyone have any load data they can share to get me started. Worst that can happen is I don’t settle on them in the end. Atleast I can say I tried. Thanks Ken

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792


RL26 with 160gr Nosler Partitions WLR primers and Wi cases at 2.800 OAL gave 2762 FPS out of my Tikka 22.4" barrel

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792


I use the 120gr Barnes TTSX , 130gr Speer BT, and the 140gr Accubond. in my Tikka. I think they are better suited for the 7mm-08.

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
2
2500HD Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
2
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
I got to thinking today about the velocity of 7 mm 150 gr and 168 gr bullet running in the 2600-2800 FPS range.

I built a 357 rimless (.223 basic brass cut at 1.8”) pushing a 180 gr .358 bullet at 2600 FPS and 150 Gr. At 2870 FPS with no where near the case capacity of the bottle necked case of the 7-08. I know the 358 bullet does not babe the bc or long range trajectory but the powder is still pushing the weight.

Why?

Last edited by 2500HD; 01/18/20.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
Originally Posted by 2500HD
So I still may try the Berger VLD 168’s. Does anyone have any load data they can share to get me started. Worst that can happen is I don’t settle on them in the end. Atleast I can say I tried. Thanks Ken


If you’re gonna experiment, use the 162 eldx. If it works, let me know. I have no interest in the VLD after experimenting with the 140 gr VLD Hunting.




P


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,107
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,107
With full discloser, I shoot moly plated bullets, so most likely you won't be able to run as much with bare bullets, so.....

In a 24" Rock barrel, I went to 42 grains of Varget and R-15 with either 162 Amax or 168 VLD's in the lands. Give or take 2700 fps.

I had a factory 700 Varmint with a 24" heavy barrel, that I shot strictly 162 Amax in, but can't find my notes, pretty sure I was using R-15.

Edit....found the old post on the varmint gun. Too bad the pics are gone, as Imageshack pulled the same shlt as Photobucket did.

https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt...-08/Search/true/7-08-nirvana#Post7629839

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
2
2500HD Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
2
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 855
I have a box of 162 ELD x too. Give me some time I’ll eventually get to it. Lol

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
Originally Posted by 2500HD
I have a box of 162 ELD x too. Give me some time I’ll eventually get to it. Lol



I load the 162 in my 7mm Rem Mag, close to 3k.


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Originally Posted by 2500HD
So I still may try the Berger VLD 168’s. Does anyone have any load data they can share to get me started. Worst that can happen is I don’t settle on them in the end. Atleast I can say I tried. Thanks Ken


If you’re gonna experiment, use the 162 eldx. If it works, let me know. I have no interest in the VLD after experimenting with the 140 gr VLD Hunting.




P

The 162 AM certainly works.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,986
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Originally Posted by 2500HD
So I still may try the Berger VLD 168’s. Does anyone have any load data they can share to get me started. Worst that can happen is I don’t settle on them in the end. Atleast I can say I tried. Thanks Ken


If you’re gonna experiment, use the 162 eldx. If it works, let me know. I have no interest in the VLD after experimenting with the 140 gr VLD Hunting.




P

The 162 AM certainly works.



What’s you data and on-game experience with the 162 AM?


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,435
I've found accurate loads using IMR4166, H4350, TAC, N203, and CFE223. They have ranged from 2630-2745 fps, and I settled on IMR4166 at 2630 fps in my 7-08's. I would kind of like to try Varget, as well, but haven't yet.

On-game experience with the 162 AM from the 7-08 includes a bunch of critters from WT and MD to elk and moose. I have seen nothing but excellent bullet performance from the 162 AM, which is probably the result of a high SD and modest impact velocities. I have seen the 162 AM drive through a moose shoulder on a broadside shot and end up under the hide on the offside. The expanded bullet looked just like what one would expect from a Horn IL.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
560 members (260Remguy, 007FJ, 160user, 10gaugeman, 17CalFan, 1Longbow, 53 invisible), 2,341 guests, and 1,088 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,597
Posts18,398,204
Members73,815
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.197s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9328 MB (Peak: 1.1262 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 12:41:56 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS