24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 388
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 388
In another thread it was discussed that differences in case capacity between brands can lead to over pressures. Is there any correlation between case weight and capacity - i.e. the more a case weighs, the less capacity?

As part of my research, I weighed 5 cases of 7.62x39 from 5 different brands and took the average weight:

PMC - 116.24gr

FC - 117.82gr

Winchester - 122.5gr

Fiocchi - 119.24

S&B - 119.24

Could I assume that the Winchester has the least case capacity since it has the highest average weight? Also, I was surprised by the amount of difference in weight of the 5 cases. It seems all the brands had a pretty wide range with a couple with more than 6gr between the lightest and the heaviest case.

BP-B2

Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 162
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 162
I wouldn’t know about the Winchester case having the least capacity but within a specific same brand, I have yet to measure a heavy case that didn’t have less case capacity than it’s lighter counterpart.

I don’t think it would be safe to assume anything when it comes to max charges and different brands of brass. A chronograph is your best friend.

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,682
S
Campfire Outfitter
Online Happy
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,682
I posted this before, but it relates to your question. It's fair to say that the heavier the case, the less volume. This is because the case measures the same externally, so any weight difference will mean the internal volume has to change. Heavier brass - less volume. Lighter brass - more volume.

Sometimes this difference is inconsequential. But it is not always so. As well, smaller cases will see faster, more aggressive swings in pressure.

Smaller cases like the 7.62x39mm or 223, are more sensitive to changes. These differences can take a safe load to unsafe, just by switching the brass you use. You will get a large change in pressure for not much of a velocity increase.

In 2008, I tested six different 7.62x39mm cases. Here are some of the results. There have always been differences in weight and volume with different lots made by the same manufacturer.
---

Empty Case Weight by Manufacturer - without primer

Igman 105.8 grains
Prvi Partizan 111.9 grains
Federal 118.0 grains
Winchester 122.1 grains
PMC 122.4 grains
Lapua 126.6 grains

Case Capacity – water weight in grains

Lapua -- 33.6 grains
Prvi Partizan -- 35.2 grains
Igman -- 36.0 grains
Federal -- 37.6 grains
PMC -- 37.6 grains
Winchester -- 37.9 grains

Pressure Differences Caused by Changing Case Brands

The powder charge, bullet and primer remained the same, but look what happened to the pressure when the case capacity was reduced. The 'Pressure by Case' goes from the most to the least internal volume. As case volume decreases, pressure increases.

These volume differences show why you should always start at the minimum load listed!!

The Load
Bullet - Lapua FMJ
Primer - Winchester Large Rifle
Powder - 28.5 grains of AA1680
Cartridge over all length of 2.200 inches

Maximum Safe Pressure - 51,488 PSI

Pressure by Case

Brand -- Pressure (PSI) -- Percentage of case filled
1. Winchester -- 50,264 -- 86
2. PMC -- 51,150 -- 87
3. Federal -- 51,150 -- 87
4. Igman -- 56,522 -- 91
5. Prvi Partizan -- 59,701 -- 93
6. Lapua -- 67,921-- 99


Safe Shooting!
Steve Redgwell
www.303british.com

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain
Member - Professional Outdoor Media Association of Canada
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,855
W
WAM Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,855
I would doubt there is much capacity difference in the cases you weighed, assuming they were the same trim length and all had primers in or all removed. In the most extreme case weight difference I have observed, there was a significant delta in capacity. That instance was 7mm Weatherby brass. Hornady weighed 243 gr and Weatherby weighed 212 gr. Hornady was less volume and produced pressure signs with less powder. I learned to carefully check case weight/capacity after that even between same brands of cases. Federal and Remington brass seems to be close in some cartridges, Winchester often lighter/more volume. Your experience may vary. Happy Trails


Life Member NRA, RMEF, American Legion, MAGA. Not necessarily in that order.
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 388
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 388
Thanks Steve - it's interesting that the Winchester and PMC cases were heavier than most of the rest, but had the largest measured case capacity...

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,450
C
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
C
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,450
Ya, how is that accomplished? Brass material make-up?

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,399
H
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,399
Water capacity of FF'd brass and COAL for your individual load will tell you more than will the weight of the brass. None of the above will tell you the whole story sans chrono.


I can walk on water.......................but I do stagger a bit on alcohol.
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,682
S
Campfire Outfitter
Online Happy
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,682
Originally Posted by GunLoony88
Thanks Steve - it's interesting that the Winchester and PMC cases were heavier than most of the rest, but had the largest measured case capacity...


There are a number of reasons why capacities vary, but they can change lot to lot. Sometimes, companies have their brass manufactured by someone else. There have been changes to ammunition/component specifications as well, although this last thing doesn't happen often.

Web and wall thickness also play a role. When they draw the cups while forming the cases, small variances will occur. A few grains isn't much. You would have to speak with an engineer to find out how much of a swing is brought about by 0.001 variance in wall or web thickness.


Safe Shooting!
Steve Redgwell
www.303british.com

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain
Member - Professional Outdoor Media Association of Canada
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Y
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Y
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Originally Posted by GunLoony88
Thanks Steve - it's interesting that the Winchester and PMC cases were heavier than most of the rest, but had the largest measured case capacity...


"measured case capacity" can be wildly innacurate, unless you're doing something to ensure the outside dimensions of each case are identical. It's important to think about the difference between a case sitting there on your bench, and the same case under pressure formed to the chamber walls when it fires. What you're measuring on the bench is not the same, and there can be significant capacity differences between otherwise identical cases.

Even if the cases were all fired in the same rifle (or sized in the same FL die), variations in brass hardness means variations in spring-back from the chamber or sizing die walls, which results in case capacity differences. In my experience, case weight is a much more accurate indicator of actual capacity.

There can be some error in sorting by case weight, but the biggest uncontrolled variable there is the dimensions of the extractor groove. Every other area of the case is enclosed by the chamber and bolt, and additional brass in any of those areas directly correlates to case capacity during the firing cycle.

Last edited by Yondering; 01/16/20.
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,565
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,565
Originally Posted by Yondering
Originally Posted by GunLoony88
Thanks Steve - it's interesting that the Winchester and PMC cases were heavier than most of the rest, but had the largest measured case capacity...


"measured case capacity" can be wildly innacurate, unless you're doing something to ensure the outside dimensions of each case are identical. It's important to think about the difference between a case sitting there on your bench, and the same case under pressure formed to the chamber walls when it fires. What you're measuring on the bench is not the same, and there can be significant capacity differences between otherwise identical cases.

Even if the cases were all fired in the same rifle (or sized in the same FL die), variations in brass hardness means variations in spring-back from the chamber or sizing die walls, which results in case capacity differences. In my experience, case weight is a much more accurate indicator of actual capacity.

There can be some error in sorting by case weight, but the biggest uncontrolled variable there is the dimensions of the extractor groove. Every other area of the case is enclosed by the chamber and bolt, and additional brass in any of those areas directly correlates to case capacity during the firing cycle.



I agree with all of that.

There are some differences in composition as between different makers and perhaps lots of brass. See for example https://www.accurateshooter.com/technical-articles/x-ray-spectrometry-of-cartridge-brass/ . However the difference in SG across this fairly narrow band of composition is not very much, perhaps +/- about 1 %.

The extractor groove dimensions, and things like the extent of bevelling of the case head, and perhaps also case mouths and primer pockets, will be more significant variables in the weight vs capacity i think. If you look at different brands of brass there can be quite wide variation in how much metal is removed in cutting the extractor groove and bevelling the case head. If it wasn't for these, you'd expect that for a given external size the weight of the case would be a very good proxy for internal volume.

IC B3

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Can't find the article but believe it was also from accurate shooter, they weighed several brands of cases and even though the weights varied widely the capacity range differences was fairly small. It was even less than what Steve Redgewell found, I doubt this is true for all cartridges but it was for the 243 cases that were weighed in their sample. MD has explained his method or water capacity using a seated bullet several times, I think this is the best way after all bullet prep has been done and after two firings.


"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
797 members (10gaugemag, 163bc, 12344mag, 007FJ, 160user, 10ring1, 78 invisible), 3,210 guests, and 1,308 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,710
Posts18,400,171
Members73,820
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.176s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8434 MB (Peak: 0.9401 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 01:20:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS