24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,195
N
ned Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
N
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,195
Have not seen these around for a while. Metric calibers with round nose bullets are just too cool.

6.5 Round Nose


Last edited by ned; 02/08/20.

Ride well, shoot straight, and speak the truth.
GB1

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
That would be a hell of a little timber bull or buck basher in a 6.5 Swede.


Trump Won!
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,603
J
Joe Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,603
I'm surprised these are available as most RNs have been dropped.


Shew me thy ways, O LORD: teach me thy paths.
"there are few better cartridges on Earth than the 7 x 57mm Mauser"
"the .30 Springfield is light, accurate, penetrating, and has surprising stopping power"
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 218
B
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
B
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 218
It's likely a limited run. They made a batch of the same bullet a couple years ago IIRC. Just waiting for a run of the 7mm 175 RN's. Have a few hundred of that one on hand but would like to get enough to not have to worry about it again.

Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 365
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 365
I have a box of these and no 6.5 at the moment. I would trade for 30 cal ballistic tips if anyone is interested...

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,735
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,735
Wonder how a 6.5 CM would shoot them. May just have to find out. Thanks to "ned" for the tip.

Last edited by bigwhoop; 02/10/20.

My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,195
N
ned Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
N
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
Wonder how a 6.5 CM would shoot them. May just have to find out. Thanks to "ned" for the tip.


FWIW here's on of the comments on them in the CM:

"Favorite hog bullet (so far) for hogs using my 6.5CM 20" BA Barrel 1:8TR Getting 2505FPS using 42.2gr of IMR4350. When these became available I purchased another 400 rounds. Hornady changed the box size. It's about 25% larger box which makes storage an issue."



Last edited by ned; 02/11/20. Reason: I have a short attention span

Ride well, shoot straight, and speak the truth.
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 241
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 241
$39.99 PER 100.........for an "F"ing Round Nose.....i guess Hornady thinks they are Nosler now.........yeah uh huh...




Last edited by HeavyDove; 02/12/20.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,654
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,654
Originally Posted by Joe
I'm surprised these are available as most RNs have been dropped.


Someone found a pallet with 3 inches of dust on it in the back of the warehouse.

It can happen whistle


'Four legs good, two legs baaaad."
----------------------------------------------
"Jimmy, some of it's magic,
Some of it's tragic,
But I had a good life all the way."
(Jimmy Buffett)

SotG
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,556
I saw a bullet test one time that included these and they under-performed on penetration and weight retention, compared to more standard spire point bullets.


You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it.
A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck.
Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,801
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,801
Originally Posted by gunner500
That would be a hell of a little timber bull or buck basher in a 6.5 Swede.


IF it was a reliable bullet.

Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I have used the 160 Hornady some on deer, and will not use it again--and that was at a muzzle velocity of around 2200 from the 6.5x54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer round. Saw it break both shoulders and exit--and fail to reach the far ribs on a behind-the-shoulder shot.

Last edited by mathman; 02/12/20.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,408
D
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,408
I have zero interest in a 6.5 bullet that weighs 160 grains! YMMV

I'm perfectly happy with the 120-143 bullets and see no need for a 160 gr bullet.


Liberalism is a cancer
Support Christian Family values
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,276
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,276
I used to load them for a 18.5 inch barreled Swedish Mauser ... seemed to work well on a couple of Whitetail.... I don’t remember the exactas, been 2 decades ago .. but Im positive all taken were within 100yds... ..
They are some many more .264 bullets offered now ...I’d lean toward 140gr fodder now

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,858
O
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,858
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by gunner500
That would be a hell of a little timber bull or buck basher in a 6.5 Swede.


IF it was a reliable bullet.

Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I have used the 160 Hornady some on deer, and will not use it again--and that was at a muzzle velocity of around 2200 from the 6.5x54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer round. Saw it break both shoulders and exit--and fail to reach the far ribs on a behind-the-shoulder shot.

Thanks for posting that Mathman. JB's post surprises me. I fully believe him but am shocked at the lack of reliability in the bullet.


There are 2 rules to success:

1. Never tell everything that you know.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,695
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,695
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by gunner500
That would be a hell of a little timber bull or buck basher in a 6.5 Swede.


IF it was a reliable bullet.

Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I have used the 160 Hornady some on deer, and will not use it again--and that was at a muzzle velocity of around 2200 from the 6.5x54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer round. Saw it break both shoulders and exit--and fail to reach the far ribs on a behind-the-shoulder shot.

Thanks for posting that Mathman. JB's post surprises me. I fully believe him but am shocked at the lack of reliability in the bullet.


I'm a fan of Round Nose and High Sectional Density bullets...

I have used the 160 grain RN Hornady on several deer.....

I was not impressed with it...

I have used the 140 SP and the 129 grain SP from Hornady... I am definitely a fan of those..
they worked... the 160 RN was marginal despite what one would think.


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,491
7
79S Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
7
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,491
Originally Posted by Seafire
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by gunner500
That would be a hell of a little timber bull or buck basher in a 6.5 Swede.


IF it was a reliable bullet.

Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I have used the 160 Hornady some on deer, and will not use it again--and that was at a muzzle velocity of around 2200 from the 6.5x54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer round. Saw it break both shoulders and exit--and fail to reach the far ribs on a behind-the-shoulder shot.

Thanks for posting that Mathman. JB's post surprises me. I fully believe him but am shocked at the lack of reliability in the bullet.


I'm a fan of Round Nose and High Sectional Density bullets...

I have used the 160 grain RN Hornady on several deer.....

I was not impressed with it...

I have used the 140 SP and the 129 grain SP from Hornady... I am definitely a fan of those..
they worked... the 160 RN was marginal despite what one would think.


I read somewhere, the 160 round nose is known for bad performance it’s not the best bullet. Like you I think the 129 is hard to beat, the 140 is always been a accurate bullet..


Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.

Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,226
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,226
I bought a box of the 160 RN's the last time they did a seasonal run. Don't know why, as I already have a great 160 load in Woodleigh PPs over H1000 for my 6.5-06 Imp. If I had a Swede, though........


Murphy was a grunt.
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 500
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 500
I have done 156 gr 6.5 Fusions I’m planning to load for 6.5x55 “heavies” . Great price as they were either pulls or blems.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

678 members (007FJ, 10ring1, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 160user, 10gaugeman, 69 invisible), 2,990 guests, and 1,324 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,481
Posts18,451,879
Members73,901
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.094s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8755 MB (Peak: 1.0022 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-18 01:19:36 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS