|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,902
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,902 |
https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/galleries/14671472#Post14671472This link has my 165 Ballistic tip, 200 yard groupings w R17 in my Nosler 30’06 rifle. Powder volumes were... 55.5gr. -2840 FPS....1.1” group (5 shots) 56gr. -2870 FPS...2.2” group (4shots) 56.5gr.-2920FPS..1.5” group (4 shots). Looking at the 55.5 vs the 56.5gr loads, which would you choose for a hunting load. Max range is 500 yards for whitetail.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,900
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,900 |
If 500 yards is potentially on the menu, even with a little less velocity, I’d go what is behind “Door #1”....55.5 grains! memtb
You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel
“I’d like to be a good rifleman…..but, I prefer to be a good hunter”! memtb 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,587 |
Definitely load #1.
You could also try 56-57gr of IMR-4350 with that bullet and see if that tightens the groups up any.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,946
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,946 |
Higher velocities won't mean much if you can't hit the target.
Load #1
Last edited by dye7barrel; 03/17/20.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,516
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,516 |
If nobody has mentioned it yet, Load #1 looks to be the most useful.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,153
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,153 |
You need to shoot more groups. A decent load isn't going to double in size with a .5 gr increase in powder, what you're seeing isn't statistically valid. Shooting two groups doesn't tell the story.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,067
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,067 |
These are 200yd groups at 500 yards it even the 2.2 is only 5.5.Still in zone of an elk. Doesn't matter all that much.A t500yards,the accuracy is going to be the shooter,but still go with be best if you have it.
What is the drop of any of them at 500 yards?
I would still be shooting at 500yards to check out any load
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,614
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,614 |
These are 200yd groups at 500 yards it even the 2.2 is only 5.5.Still in zone of an elk. Doesn't matter all that much.A t500yards,the accuracy is going to be the shooter,but still go with be best if you have it.
What is the drop of any of them at 500 yards?
I would still be shooting at 500yards to check out any load 100 yard zero @guesstimated 2800 fps 54.5” @ 500 200 yard zero @ guesstimated 2800 fps 45.01” @ 500
Swifty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,736
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,736 |
Crow hunter, is correct. The smallest group (1.1" 5 shots) may turn out to be the most accurate, but with such a small sample you can't know for sure. Also, saddlesore has some good thoughts too, in the end, it really shouldn't matter much.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,912
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,912 |
When fired from field positions you won't shoot a 1/2 MOA rifle a bit better than a 1 MOA rifle. Those group sizes are only relevant from a bench. And while you have enough velocity with any of them for 500 yards all else being equal speed never hurts. I'd choose #3.
Most people don't really want the truth.
They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 585
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 585 |
Option 1. Confidence in your ammo is mentally important. A 1/2 MOA load is more than adequate for 500yards; spend your time practicing field shooting positions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 500
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 500 |
I would shoot larger groups of 10 first to see if there is any real difference in accuracy among those three loads. The data you have is inconclusive. Barring that, I'd go with the fastest load, because with the small sample size you are shooting 1.1" and 1.5" are essentially the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,895
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,895 |
I'd re-shoot 55.5 grains and see if it was repeatable or not.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,251
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,251 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,948
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,948 |
Not enough groups to validate
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943 |
Don’t over think this - your 55.5 gr load would be my pick. Small differences in velocity mean nothing, especially in this day of rangefinders and ballistics calculators.
That is why my main hunting rifle in 30-06 gets 200 gr Partitions for everything - it is very accurate and I know the trajectory. Oh, and that 200 gr bullet will kill everything pretty quick and not cause much meat damage.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,769
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,769 |
I'm loading 56.0 grains of IMR 4350 behind 165 grain Sierra Game Kings, 100 yard groups are great and killing power on whitetails is exceptional.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,996
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,996 |
Even if this rifle is one you have shot for a long time and have supreme confidence in, one group of 4 or 5 shots means nothing. You need to burn more powder before making an informed decision.
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,728
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,728 |
I've always found IMR 4350/58gr/any 165 to be an "accuracy load". Essentially, even other powders "in that burn rate" have also been very good from 56-59gr. "what I do", is to shoot, say #3, over again and if I think its a good one, I actually shoot it out to 500yds ( though I don't shoot unwounded game much past 350) to look at drops and groups. If its consistent, bingo. I think any of the groups show promise, and try to stay at least around 2800fps/any 165. Good luck to you pard!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,948
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,948 |
Even if this rifle is one you have shot for a long time and have supreme confidence in, one group of 4 or 5 shots means nothing. You need to burn more powder before making an informed decision. Exactamundo
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
76 members (35, 10Glocks, 14idaho, 6mmbrfan, 280shooter, 2500HD, 7 invisible),
1,597
guests, and
729
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,599
Posts18,454,544
Members73,908
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|