25 minutes of Mr. Glib was all I could take. He ignores nuclear decay and universal gravitational constant so far as well as reducing cosmic events to human time scale (If you haven't seen any kind of evolution within the human experience it must not happen). And of course falsely uses "theory" as a synonym for "fact," a common ploy.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh
25 minutes of Mr. Glib was all I could take. He ignores nuclear decay and universal gravitational constant so far as well as reducing cosmic events to human time scale (If you haven't seen any kind of evolution within the human experience it must not happen). And of course falsely uses "theory" as a synonym for "fact," a common ploy.
You lasted 25 minutes longer than I did. But Kent's such a notorious liar I didn't bother to click on the video.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Did Jesus really perform a miracle and wither the fig tree, or is it merely fable?
Which of his miracles are true and which only fable?
This particular story, especially when taken in context of surrounding events, has all the "Marks" of a fable designed to make a point about the events between when Jesus cursed the fig tree, and revisited it a day later. Here's the best explanation I've seen of the allegory surrounding the story:
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
When it comes to evolution, Kent Hovind has zero credibility. Evolution is an established fact....any contraversy or need to modify is related to the mechanisms of evolution, not the fact of it.
And of course falsely uses "theory" as a synonym for "fact," a common ploy.
Like the ‘theory of gravity’ or the ‘theory of orbital mechanics’ or the ‘theory of nuclear fission’.
I suspect that some folks like to misrepresent the nature of theory in science in order to support their own faith. Doing it time and time again after it's explained numerous times.....
And of course falsely uses "theory" as a synonym for "fact," a common ploy.
Like the ‘theory of gravity’ or the ‘theory of orbital mechanics’ or the ‘theory of nuclear fission’.
Speaking of orbital mechanics, that theory failed to match observation and we had to invent dark matter to hold galaxies together. The facts of the matter are still a tossup as per definition nobody can directly observe dark matter.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh
Evangelists understand one constant. Not all the folks will evolve beyond the inclination to send in their money.
The end of democracy, and the defeat of the American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of lending institutions and moneyed incorporations.
