Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Protect Yer Property, Get Investigated or Prosecuted

It was not Texas Cowboy!

Answer my question. How many of this violent mob of trespassers is facing charges?

You don't get it. I am not saying that what that couple did was wrong. I am saying that the system of "law" that you all want to seem to uphold is utterly broken. I am simply pointing it out. At the beginning of this thread, I MF'd all those people who support "law abiding" but aren't willing to call this what it is, according to the law. Look at it. The DA is investigating who? The criminals? NO. I didn't invent this BS system of government being the victim of a crime, and I don't subscribe to it. But you all do. And then you all want to bitch when it doesn't go your way, because the subversive media in cooperation with government is steering the narrative. FACTS DON'T MATTER. What matters is what the media tells you, because you keep watching the media.

Call me clueless all you want. It's a compliment coming from the scant intellect you've shown here.

It a MO/St. Louis issue, let them deal with it. Worrying about other states got us in the mess thanks to [bleep] Lincoln

Wrong, they had every right to point guns at the mob criminals..

The "mob" were criminals in the act of committing property damage (destroyed security gate), and any citizen in that community had a right to point at, AND SHOOT, said mob members(criminals) to cease further property damage and stop the threat.

Elkslayer ,

You are too stupid to have a cap pistol.

Again, how many of these criminals was apprehended? How many are facing charges? If you imagine this is about St Louis, or about Missouri, you are again wrong. There is a reason why it is all over media everywhere.

And that is why I have a cap and ball pistol........so I can stop the stupid.

When you get your azz handed to you, you switch the narrative.

First it was all about the citizens were breaking the law....and you lost that argument.

Now you want to talk about how many criminals were arrested, which this thread is not about. Stay on topic.

No, it is you that does not know the law. LIKE I SAID, I did not see them point their weapons at anyone.

Second, Merely openly posessing a firearm on your own private property IN THE FACE OF GREAT BODILY HARM OR DEATH is not brandishing. You're the one who needs to study up. And, just because the D.A. is some high and mighty lefty bleeder biytch, that does not change the law.

Personally, I don't care for the McCloskeys. But, that does not change the law, either.

FIFY

Just to throw out some actual law...
This is Montana law. I can’t speak to Missoura

45-3-111. Openly carrying weapon -- display -- exemption. (1) Any person who is not otherwise prohibited from doing so by federal or state law may openly carry a weapon and may communicate to another person the fact that the person has a weapon.
(2) If a person reasonably believes that the person or another person is threatened with bodily harm, the person may warn or threaten the use of force, including deadly force, against the aggressor, including drawing or presenting a weapon.
(3) This section does not limit the authority of the board of regents or other postsecondary institutions to regulate the carrying of weapons, as defined in 45-8-361(5)(b), on their campuses.

i like the wording of that

They were untrained civilians doing what they thought was reasonable to protect their lives and property under the legal guidance of the 2nd Amendment. These points make their case even stronger in my opinion. Nothing is going to stop an over reaction by a local prosecutor except a judge with his or her head screwed on straight.

kwg

Delete

What kwg wrote.

I heard it from his own mouth in his own words during his many interviews since the incident. Self proclaimed Proud BLM supporter serving the very people protesting against the “systemic injustice“ for years and years. You still think that’s a “harsh assessment“ then that’s your opinion but I’m keeping mine...

Oh and big time democrat supporter and contributors as per someone else. Can’t verify it as I did t see that for myself but I sure as hell don't doubt it in the least.

I admit I didn't hear his comments. Seems like he would know not to be making statements to the press or anyone else if involved in a legal controversy. He is a lawyer and should know better.

Karma- - - - -about to get butt-raped by the same judicial system that made him rich enough to live in a gated community in the first place! Mixed emotions- - - - -watching a Greyhound bus full of lawyers going off a 500-foot cliff into the ocean- - - - -with one empty seat!

BLM is a money laundering operation. They become active close to the Presidential Election and funnel almost ALL of their contributions to the dimrat party Presidential candidates. They bypass campaign finance laws.