Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Protect Yer Property, Get Investigated or Prosecuted

I admit I didn't hear his comments. Seems like he would know not to be making statements to the press or anyone else if involved in a legal controversy. He is a lawyer and should know better.

Local dirt & elkslayer,

If you did not see the McClokeys pointing their weapons at the crowd....your eyesight is

as hazy as your knowledge of the law.

Clearly ... you cannot figure it out.

Don't breast feed in public ....girls.

Local dirt & elkslayer,

If you did not see the McClokeys pointing their weapons at the crowd....your eyesight is

as hazy as your knowledge of the law.

Clearly ... you cannot figure it out.

Don't breast feed in public ....girls.

Local dirt & elkslayer,

If you did not see the McClokeys pointing their weapons at the crowd....your eyesight is

as hazy as your knowledge of the law.

Clearly ... you cannot figure it out.

Don't breast feed in public ....girls.

You wave a gun around in your own yard, especially under these circumstances and most folks should get a medal.

Just imagine how America would have turned out if, during the 19th century, there was an (((ACLU lawyer))) in every injun camp protesting settlers who defended themselves from the depradations and savagery of the red man.

Just imagine how America would have turned out if, during the 19th century, there was an (((ACLU lawyer))) in every injun camp protesting settlers who defended themselves from the depradations and savagery of the red man.

Not one single protester set foot on Buffy and Biffs, not one. Buffy and Biff do not own the sidewalk or the street.

Had one of the protesters had a gun they could have legally shot either Buffy or Biff as the painted the crowd with guns neither had a clue how to use.

Not one single protester set foot on Buffy and Biffs, not one. Buffy and Biff do not own the sidewalk or the street.

Had one of the protesters had a gun they could have legally shot either Buffy or Biff as the painted the crowd with guns neither had a clue how to use.

I think we should welcome these lawyers into the fold.
Yes they are libs and said they supported BLM. Easy to do, you are a millionaire watching them burn down some Yankee city, a thousand miles away.
But when the problem arrived at their front door they got an attitude adjustment.

You know this couple has had a big attitude adjustment about how wonderful BLM is. What they did is right and we should welcome them to "the cause."
Better late than never.

The sidewalk and street are behind a gate that the mob broke down to gain access to the PRIVATE community. The sidewalk and street are owned by the homeowner's associations in a gated community, at least all that I'm familiar with. The HOA is comprised of members who own property there which means Buffy and Biffs do own the sidewalk and the street and the mob was trespassing on their property.

If a member of the mob had shot either Buffy or Biff they would have done so while already in the commission of another crime which elevates the charges to capital murder in many states, I don't know about Missouri.

I don't think you can say who owns that gated community, nor how it is legally set up. It could be that a separate property management company owns and maintains the community property. No one is pressing charges on the crowd....that's not just incidental. It doesn't matter. I am convinced at this point that the whole thing is a faked hoax. It makes no sense. These "protesters" just bused to a gated community, broke in, and started marching, and then a pair of VERY connected democrat law firm owners run outside looking like clowns brandishing firearms at the crowd while perfectly framed photos are snapped by...whom? Yeah. a hoax. If it looks like schitt and smells like schitt and sticks to your boots like schitt, you are stepping in schitt.

I can't even read this whole thread. There are so many f uc king pussies that frequent this site anymore. Brainwashed cuckolds. The state has told y'all what is what for so long that you just freaking obey.

This is way beyond the first step. The first step was when all you pussies agreed that it wasn't right to shoot somebody for stealing. The bottom line on thievery isn't that it's your work so much as what do you do when all you put up is gone? You starve just like anybody else who doesn't have anything. And you get to starve while watching your wife and kids starve too.

Y'all also just worry about waving guns around. Is it better to just shoot into the mob and kill some people? Displaying weapons has stopped a lot of crimes and prevented a lot of deaths. Whoever came up with "brandishing" is a real shixtheel. Should you be able to point your gun at some family on the road that accidentally cuts you off? Hell no, but this is a totally different situation.

... Under normal circumstances, with normal people, f u ck the BLM [bleep] whether they were in the yard, in the house, in the street or whatthef u ck ever.

Some of y'all are gonna deserve what is coming your way.

You're a fu c king dumbass. First off, you're playing right into the legal system bs that pointing a gun at anybody is automatically some crime. Pointing a gun at somebody implies you're not shooting them. The "crowd" was a group of rioters and terrorists looking for loot and vandalism targets. They have experience with this in St. Louis. They had broken down a gate and were trespassing and were in the McCloskey's yard. Trespassing two ways. Then you want to parse all these finer legal points which never should have been law in the first place.

You wave a gun at some family for supposedly cutting you off in traffic and you probably should get investigated, maybe evaluated and maybe have some charges brought against you. You wave a gun around in your own yard, especially under these circumstances and most folks should get a medal.

This. Brandishing laws were originally intended only to punish those will criminal intent, such as displaying your gun to scare or intimidate people who had done nothing criminal themselves. When guns are pointed at bad folks, those with criminal intent, brandishing laws were not meant to apply. Since then, however, the antigunners who have taken over our institutions have turned this law against honest citizens merely exercising their Second Amendment right in order to defend their other basic rights, as intended by the Framers.