Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire White Woman Who Dared Point Gun At Blacks, Now Charged

Yes sir.

Were I on the jury that is all I would need to hear.

First; the white woman was pregnant, and who knows what the heck would happen to her husband for beating on a black woman and possibly her minor daughter. The only way the white folks could win this one is to leave the situation and not get back out of the car. They probably should have even called the cops when they got in the car to say they were being harassed, threatened, and felt danger for their lives and unborn child’s life to have that on record. They made the mistake of getting back out of the car in a Commie county in a Commie state...

I did think about that hormone thing. Maybe she was a quart low on ice cream and dill pickles? Really though, that could have factored into her decision making process and if they get smart lawyers that can be brought out, hoepfully pretrial.

If the prosecutors are smart, they too will do the right thing and reduce the charges before the folks have to mortgage their lives to get out of that mess.

But, knowing prosecutors, especially elected DA's looking to advance their careers, if there's a chance of garnering votes by going heavy on the charged those folks are fooked.

Right or wrong, the whole deal is a scheidt show.

IF her gestational condition made her feel
so vulnerable, why didnt she stay inside and
get her husband to exit and draw on them?

there's the chance she acted impetously
to the 'OMFG' surprise of her husband... unless
he himself urged his precious baby incubator
to leave the safety of their vehicle.. 😂

And you are a total [bleep].

Why have you gone this low? I once thought you had some semblance of rational thought. That notion is toast. Fight your demons somewhere else.

Well aren't you the tough guy!!!

A dry-gulching POS with a serious need to re-evaluate your self-worth.

Well put. The question is simple: did the appearance of a firearm escalate or de-escalate the situation and who could KNOW the answer ahead of time.

By hitting a vehicle with ones hand, that deserves pointing a gun at someone? And if the black woman had pulled a gun and there was a shootout with maiming and death(s), that’s justified in this case ?

You might want to go back and read what Beaver wrote.

Or better yet, serve on juries where these types of incidents have occurred and see the outcome.

As written here in this thread, the woman who pulled and pointed the gun at another was in no way put into a life threatening situation.

Another thing. Legally speaking, words don’t constitute a fight.

If you disagree with anything that I’ve written here,,,go for it. Then see what it gets you.

No.

The question is even more simple.

Was the person who pulled the gun ever in a life threatening situation?

That’s what it will come down to.

There is a time and place for everything, and from what I saw, that was not the time or place for the White gal to pull out a gun. As others have said, you don't pull out a gun to just threaten someone, you pull it out if you're going to use it to shoot with.

Interesting, I thought it hinged on whether she FELT threatened, or that she felt the life of her child was being threatened.

Reginald Denny.

you can bet if the situation had been reversed , and the black woman had got out of the car and pulled the gun , nothing would be done to her


and probably the DA , the major , and the police chief would pin a medal on her



blacks have always wanted to be not just equal , but more equal , and they have succeeded.........

She got out of the car armed and of her own free will.

Reginald Denny was pulled from his truck against his free will.

Big difference.

She and her husband are not only going to lose in court. They will both lose their concealed carry permits AND they will both be red flagged never to possess a firearm again.

Pulling a gun on someone - in public. - is serious scchitt and you better be right all the way down to dotting every “I” and crossing every “T”.

This nowadays includes every LEO.

Yes indeed.

What has happened to civility and manners? If you accidentally bump into someone, it should be automatic to say "I'm sorry". If for some reason one is distracted and forgets to say "I'm sorry" and the offended party calls you on it, say, "I'm sorry." What is so hard about that? If you think you are in the right or have the right to go bumping into people, you are a jerk in need of an attitude adjustment.

Ok, so you're a jerk and refuse to apologize, all you deserve at that point is a dirty look from the people you bumped into. End of interaction. But - - if you bumped into a jerk, you will now get into a loud argument. Realizing you have bumped into someone who is also a jerk, you now have the opportunity to realize the situation and defuse it by finally saying, "I'm sorry." But no - - - you aren't a rational jerk, you are a stubborn, irrational and stupid jerk who can't see where this could be heading. So, instead you hurl insults.

Now, the person you just insulted, could recognize that you are a special kind of jerk not worth messing with and instead just turn around and walk away. But no - - - they are also a stubborn, irrational jerk and they are not going to let anyone get away with calling them names. So they are going to follow you to your car and hit your car to prove their point that you are jerks, by also being a jerk..

Not to be out-jerked, sitting safely in your car, you will now show them it's not smart to get into an argument with jerks who carry guns, who think that they are somehow in the right here. So,you pull a gun and wave it around to scare them off. So, now, it's up to the courts to figure this all out and to let you know that you can't wave loaded guns around to scare off someone who just hit your car (not you, but YOUR CAR) with their hand.

So the likely result will be our pregnant jerk will get probation, maybe also a fine, and she will lose her concealed carry permit, as is appropriate. She has already shown she has bad judgement and is not mature, decent, or civil enough to be in possession of a deadly weapon. She's just lucky the person she bumped into wasn't another gun-toting jerk because her drawing a gun is a deadly threat and she and her baby could have been killed and it would have been self defense.

Ever read Bonfire of the Vanities? Prosecutors are always looking for the White Whale of a White person victimizing a black person. Once they have one, they want him/her to serve a long prison term, for the advancement of their own careers. And the MSM will have their backs 100% through the whole process.

Truer words..

Yessir.

And being stupid won’t help a person’s cause one iota.

Feeling threatened isn't enough to justify deadly force (which didn't occur here anyway). For deadly force, your belief that you were threatened must be perceived as reasonable by the standard of the ordinary prudent person, putting themselves in your shoes at that moment. Also, the threat needs to be severe, i.e., to life or limb. The threat must also have been of imminent harm, not harm ten minutes from now, or if you do this or that.

Now we need to address whether those same standards should apply to a threatening display of a gun, and I don't think they should. Seems to me that the totality of the situation justified the gun's threatening display. The blacks were determined to raise a simple disagreement (which they manufactured themselves with the White couple) to the level where some sort of violence would result, so they could harm one or both of them, even extending to placing their bodies in the way of their car as they sought to escape the situation. That could be interpreted as False Imprisonment, which by itself justifies sufficient force to defeat it.