Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Police Seize McCloskey's Firearm

Wondering if they made some kind threatening statements after the showdown event. You’d think a lawyer would be too savvy to do that.

At the second event at their home, the McCloskeys praised the police for holding the rioters back.

As TRH said, sounds like a red flag type thing.

What that fugly bittch needs is a tit job and a face transplant. If they were like average people, for damn sure one of the lawyers would have the pistol as partial downpayment on services-yet-not-to-be-rendered or services-yet-to-be-incompetently rendered.

The NRA? Wtf? lmao They're too busy buying mansions and suits for Wayne whilst fighting his legal battles and sending letters out to people to pay for it all. Don't forget to vote for your representatives.

Hey, Dude,,,,”It’s time to stand and fight”!!!!!!

As per LaPierre.
Grins

Whole thing stinks.

first reports says gates were broken down
later reports say gates were undamaged.

guy (lawyer) holding the rifle appears to be left handed, but other picts suggest otherwise.
early model Colt or Armalite, with iron sights.-- guy with that kind of dough and, if he shoots at all, would probably have something more current, especially something with a light on a rail

notice the carrying strap has been "tensioned"with a double wrap, and his right hand is holding the forearm. this guy has been coached

lady needs more coaching, sweeping her husband and the crowd.

don't think either one on them does much practice

lawyers previous work doesn't meet the smell test--- in being pro 2A

I'm late to the meeting but here's.02c .

I don't like the couple who defended their home any more than the commies invading their neighbor hood.
That said, if the police, chief, mayors, etc. Get away with violating the Constitution with this couple, they will have absolutely no problem doing the same with us. That goes for Mr T as well. Just to remind us all, here's from yesteryear.

[video:youtube]https://www.infowars.com/flashback-why-trump-should-not-support-red-flag-gun-confiscation/[/video]

My local buddies told me how I need to get on the bandwagon with MrT when he came out with this.
I say, MrT, police, etc. just need to have some principles to stand on.

If those people don’t have some more gums hidden away, or don’t buy some more right now, they’re nuts.

Search warrant would have to list a crime that the rifle is evidence of. Wonder what crime they are alleging?
Would be interested to hear from someone who is familiar with the specific law of that state.

That "news" story does not seem to be dependable and I would not place much confidence there - does not say that the police are searching for a handgun. And, is it true that the police still have a rifle they seized from the guy?

Nothing but a pony show.
Once!
One single time that I've seen a cop seize a weapon and not remove the magazine and this was it.
Cop stood there with the rifle, magazine inserted, in full view of the cameras for 10 minutes.
Even when there's huge drug/ gun seizures the weapons are cleared and magazines separated.
WHY?

Because it's a bullshit media's hype contrivance.
Fully fabricated for the sake of there camera.
100% false flag.

[img]https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/p...is-couple-used-to-defend-their-home/amp/[/img]

Wishing I could kick a couple rinos in the crotch right about now..

With Red Flag laws, you don't need to allege a suspected crime. All you need is a judge who's been told that the cops think this guy might be dangerous at some point in the future. The judge then has a choice of granting the gun confiscation order or not. If he doesn't grant the order, and the cops were right, and the guy shoots someone later on, the judge is blamed for not acting when the cops told him about the danger. As a result, judges tend to rubber stamp such requests.

PS Needless to say, Red Flag laws are a clear violation of several of the planks of the Bill of Rights, to include the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.

Looks like they should have stayed indoors and just started shooting as the dimocraps started coming through their doors.

What do you all think?

So someone can be deprived of their rights to private property and to keep and bear arms without being charged with a crime, and you claim that there is "nothin wrong" with it because it "happens all the time". No wonder we are where we are as a nation.

These mobs have been known to set buildings on fire.

Looked like cops that took his gun away even though he has a legal right to have it. It’s ok though they are just following orders. They would never do that to you or me. Right? Cops have gotta choose a side. Ed k

The cops kick the door of the right type of people, and we could easily have another Waco.

😎

But yet they've been enacted in at least 14 states, probably more by now, with nary a whisper of a constitutional challenge in a court.

MM

Mysterious, isn't it? I know that Gun Owners of America is fighting all of them in court. Just hasn't gotten to the Supremes yet.

The usual stupidity from kuhuntnshoot.

The 4th Amendment allows for search warrants to issue upon affidavit evidencing probable cause.

The investigation is probably for assault or a weapons charge.

If the weapon in the video is airsoft, it may still be assault, but much harder to get to a weapons charge.

The dumbshit should go ta jail for still havin it around, and the broad for givin it to an attorney.