24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,407
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,407
I wrote up a couple of replies in Big Game reloading, here's my last: BTW< this shoots flat enough for me and my deer hunting.


After combing manuals, magazines and google searches I decided not to decrease those 200 grain Sierra loads with IMR4198, I do not understand how Ken Waters got 200 fps slower with the same model rifle though.

I read on another blog shooters using 1680, Two of them claimed that the Accurate manual went to 40 grains behind the 200 grain Sierra. I went to the Accurate manual on-line and the manual did not have any loads for the 375 Win. They must of had an older manual.

I took the rifle out with 39 grains behind the 200 grain Sierra bullet. The accuracy was there - about 2 MOA at 85 yards with iron sights and old eyes.

The velocity:
2352 fps
2401 fps
2355 fps
2374 fps
2376 fps

average 2371.6 fps - if corrected for chronograph 10' ahead of bench - 2411.6 fps (If it loses 200 fps in the first 50 yard, then maybe it lost ~ 40 fps in 10 yards.)

This is a bit faster than I expected. The accuracy is there.

The drop, velocity and energy according to the Application "Shooter"
distance POI Velocity Energy
50 yards= 2.1" 2,209 fps 2,167 ft-lb
100 yards= 3.1" 2,022 fps 1,815 ft-lb
150 yards= 2.0" 1,855 fps 1,528 ft-lb
200 yards= -1.6" 1,700 fps 1,284 ft-lb
250 yards = -8.2" 1,566 fps 1,088 ft-lb

I have quite a bit of 1680 on hand for the 17 Hornet, so I will probably use this load for my 200 grain Jacketed load.


I prefer classic.
Semper Fi
I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
GB1

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,581
N
North61 Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
N
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,581
For deer sized game the 200 Sierra would be hard to beat. Seems like we are all having good luck with 1680 and this bullet.

Last edited by North61; 07/23/20.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 237
M
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 237
Anybody try 1680 with the 255gr Barnes? I'm loading for son in law's new production 38-55.

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 328
S
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
S
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 328
Originally Posted by markak338fed
Anybody try 1680 with the 255gr Barnes? I'm loading for son in law's new production 38-55.

I haven't, but would like to know which one you're using: .375" or .377"?

Thank you.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,581
N
North61 Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
N
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,581
I have had such good luck with RL 7 with the heavier bullets that I haven't tried.

IC B2

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 237
M
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 237
North61, that's all I've ever used also, was just curious, thanks.

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

471 members (10gaugemag, 160user, 10Glocks, 12344mag, 17CalFan, 10ring1, 35 invisible), 2,345 guests, and 1,068 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,285
Posts18,467,837
Members73,928
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.083s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8216 MB (Peak: 0.8874 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 12:19:12 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS