|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238 |
I sense Mr. Barnard is on a different wavelength than many of us here. U B correct Sir.
Trump Won!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,016
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,016 |
Dan before he went digital Does Digital come right before Ballistic...?  DF
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 888
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 888 |
Hi point 45 acp rifles take a 14 rd magazine, just another example how every gun is a ak or ar to the media.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,412
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,412 |
When criminals are doing illegal acts, why cant they be illegally shot? fu-k a trial and due process, you willingly, "REPEATEDLY" forfeited that right! "Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."[1] It was found that use of deadly force to prevent escape is an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment, in the absence of probable cause that the fleeing suspect posed a physical danger.[2]:563–7 "
Me solum relinquatis
Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,412
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,412 |
When criminals are doing illegal acts, why cant they be illegally shot? fu-k a trial and due process, you willingly, "REPEATEDLY" forfeited that right! gunner, you're thinking old school... This is a kinder, gentler anarchy we're now dealing with... Where's the love...  DF Yes, they must be arrested without harm, housed, fed, medicated, taken complete care of till their tax funded trials..................I guess the love is somewhere between safe and fire ; ] Now you know why various agencies wouldn’t hire me after I returned from Nam. That includes municipal, county and state here in Floriduh, and the Fibbies. Barbarian Dan I got turned down SEVEN times after getting out. I was told off-line that if I got involved in a "Use of Force" incident, the city would be sued for hiring " a trained killer".
Me solum relinquatis
Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189 |
So was Mar-a-Lago incidental to the situation, or was it involved in whatever the goals these armed teens had? I'd like to know that. Doesn't sound like Mar-a-Lago was a target. I'd also like to know the race of the kids, the names of their parents, and the owner of the car.
I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,016
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,016 |
Hi point 45 acp rifles take a 14 rd magazine, just another example how every gun is a ak or ar to the media. The one with the folding stock would easily fit in a back pack... I guess any evil looking "rifle" with a pistol grip is an AK or an AR by default... Reckon they all look alike... DF
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,016
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,016 |
When criminals are doing illegal acts, why cant they be illegally shot? fu-k a trial and due process, you willingly, "REPEATEDLY" forfeited that right! gunner, you're thinking old school... This is a kinder, gentler anarchy we're now dealing with... Where's the love... DF Yes, they must be arrested without harm, housed, fed, medicated, taken complete care of till their tax funded trials..................I guess the love is somewhere between safe and fire ; ] Now you know why various agencies wouldn’t hire me after I returned from Nam. That includes municipal, county and state here in Floriduh, and the Fibbies. Barbarian Dan I got turned down SEVEN times after getting out. I was told off-line that if I got involved in a "Use of Force" incident, the city would be sued for hiring " a trained killer". Wow... "Untrained killer" may end up on a marble slab... DF
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,278
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,278 |
When criminals are doing illegal acts, why cant they be illegally shot? fu-k a trial and due process, you willingly, "REPEATEDLY" forfeited that right! gunner, you're thinking old school... This is a kinder, gentler anarchy we're now dealing with... Where's the love... DF Yes, they must be arrested without harm, housed, fed, medicated, taken complete care of till their tax funded trials..................I guess the love is somewhere between safe and fire ; ] Now you know why various agencies wouldn’t hire me after I returned from Nam. That includes municipal, county and state here in Floriduh, and the Fibbies. Barbarian Dan I got turned down SEVEN times after getting out. I was told off-line that if I got involved in a "Use of Force" incident, the city would be sued for hiring " a trained killer". Jeez! You never mentioned that at Armijo Springs, at least when I was around! Just knowing what you are doing lately, I have a lot of respect for what you've gone through. BTW, the kids are pining for more shooting experience. Norm
Norman Solberg
International lawyer, lately for 25 years in Japan, now working on trusts in the US, the 3rd greatest tax haven. NRA Life Member for over 50 years, NRA Endowment (2014), Patron (2016).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238 |
When criminals are doing illegal acts, why cant they be illegally shot? fu-k a trial and due process, you willingly, "REPEATEDLY" forfeited that right! "Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."[1] It was found that use of deadly force to prevent escape is an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment, in the absence of probable cause that the fleeing suspect posed a physical danger.[2]:563–7 " Again why my hats always been off to you guys, the maturity, patience, professionalism, resolve, temperament, and chain of command horseshlt I do not possess.
Trump Won!
|
|
|
|
|
611 members (1936M71, 163bc, 12344mag, 160user, 007FJ, 01Foreman400, 72 invisible),
2,749
guests, and
1,229
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,538
Posts18,453,065
Members73,901
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
