24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,387
L
Lennie Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
L
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,387
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12354855


Under its 'one country, two systems' policy, Beijing insists Taiwan is part of its sovereign mandate. Which is why its so-called 'wolf warrior' diplomats have reacted with outrage at news this week that the US Health Secretary will visit the island to discuss its success in combating the COVID-19 pandemic.

Meanwhile, Chinese fighters and bombers have been engaged in a series of "combat readiness" exercises over the disputed South China Sea, with combat aircraft and naval vessels observed visiting illegal island fortresses in the Spratly Islands.

Tension reaching boiling point
The Type 05 amphibious armoured vehicles are designed to deliver troops from the sea across a beachhead battlefield.

"The PLA are also deploying the powerful Type PCL191 multiple launch rocket systems to the ground forces of the Eastern Theatre Command," Kanwa Asian magazine defence editor Andrei Chang writes. These have a range of some 350km.

"The Taiwan Strait is just 180km across. The PCL191 rocket launchers are able to destroy all military bases and government buildings on the island accurately."

Meanwhile, Taiwan has responded by sending a company of about 200 marines to reinforce the Pratas Islands national marine park in the South China Sea – 445km from Taiwan and 300km from China.

China described a US rejection of its maritime claims in the South China Sea as completely unjustified and accused the US of attempting to sow discord between China and South East Asia. Photo / AP
China described a US rejection of its maritime claims in the South China Sea as completely unjustified and accused the US of attempting to sow discord between China and South East Asia. Photo / AP
"The marines left for the Pratas about a week ago and will remain there on a short-term rather than a long-term basis," a military source told the South China Morning Post.

US gets involved
The increase in Chinese military activity has also been met with a response by the United States. Its surveillance aircraft have stepped up the extent and frequency of their activity in and around Taiwan, closely monitoring Beijing's forces. Bomber movements are being observed. Submarines are being tracked. Activity on and around island fortresses are being watched.


A Chinese State University think-tank reports 67 US reconnaissance aircraft had been detected in the area in July. This was almost twice that seen in previous months.

"The risk of a military clash exists, and we should be alert to it," Beijing Institute of International Relations Professor Li Haidong said.


"There is a high possibility that the US will further escalate its conflict with China before the election, Professor Li said, noting that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's call for the 'free world' to unite against China implies that once the US launches military action against China, many countries will stand with it."

This week, Chinese state media has lauded a 10-hour flight by six of its Su-30MKK fighter jets from the mainland to Subi Reef in the Spratly Islands.

There they joined two Chinese navy warships, a Type 054A frigate and a Type 056 corvette. These were photographed anchored in Mischief Reef's protected lagoon.

The reef, unilaterally occupied by Beijing before being transformed into an artificial island fortress, is one of the largest features of the Spratly Islands judged by the UN to fall far outside Chinese territorial control.

Touted as an air-sea rescue facility, it features a military-grade 3km runway, armoured hangars, communications arrays, radars and weapons towers.

Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has all but surrendered his nation's claim to the traditional fishing grounds, saying last week: "China is claiming it, we are claiming it. China has the arms, we do not have it. So, it's simple as that. They are in possession of the property. So what can we do? We have to go to war. And I cannot afford it. Maybe some other president can. But I cannot."

Military analysts have noted that the 10-hour flight by the Chinese fighters to Subi Reef was unnecessary. At its cruising speed, the Su-30 needs only three hours to cover the distance as they can fly at speeds of up to 2100km/h, with a horizontal flying speed of 1400km/h.

"The math on a 10-hour trip doesn't make sense," China Aerospace Studies Institute director Brendan Mulvaney told Radio Free Asia.

"It's about 2100km from Changsha (south-central China) to the Spratlys, which should only take two to three hours at typical cruise speeds. At 10 hours round trip, that implies they're flying at 420km/h which is unlikely".

Its duration, however, may be intended as a signal that its pilots are training for the endurance necessary to strike more distant facilities, such as US bases in Guam, Singapore and Darwin.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-controlled Global Times declared the exercise to be of "significant strategic value to the PLA's complete patrol coverage of the entire South China Sea".

Invasion fears
The latest moves are just the most recent examples of intensifying Chinese military activity around Taiwan.

"As China is eager to expand its communist ideology and authoritarian international order, Taiwan is on the frontline of defending freedom and democracy," Taiwan's Foreign Minister Joseph Wu said last week. "What China is doing now is continuing to ramp up preparedness to solve the Taiwan issue. The threat is on the rise."

The odds are against the island nation, with Chinese military performing "simulated invasions" and daily incursions by combat aircraft.


Taiwan has 140,000 troops. China has 1 million. Taipei has 350 fighters. Beijing has 1500.

But the battleground has now reformed between Beijing and Washington as US-China relations deteriorate.

Beijing declares any international engagement with Taiwan crosses a "red line". Washington insists it will act to preserve Taiwan's democratic values.

It's a scenario that could lead to "some kind of a military dust-up", Asia Society Centre on US-China Relations analyst Orville Schell told CNBC.

And Beijing's options are rapidly narrowing

"Everything else having failed, President Xi may therefore feel compelled to put a premium on a military strategy in the Taiwan Strait," said Michael Cole from the Global Taiwan Institute. "The two pillars of Beijing's strategy towards Taiwan – coercion and incentivisation – have failed to arrest ongoing trends in Taiwan supporting independence and a democratic form of governance."

And Xi may have painted himself into a corner.

He's been whipping up nationalist fervour in an attempt to distract his people from growing economic and civil challenges. He's proclaimed to his party colleagues that the "embarrassment" of Taiwan cannot be passed from "generation to generation".

Taiwan has become bolder in standing up to China after observing the CCP's behaviour in asserting control over Hong Kong.

"Taiwan may be small, but we know what we are fighting for is more than Taiwan," Wu said. "It's our values that are at stake."


In training to be an obedient master to my two labs

Shooting, fishing and hunting
GB1

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,423
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,423
1. China does not have the capability to invade Taiwan. Power projection is HARD, especially moving troops over waters that might not be in one's control.

2. China has the capability to destroy Taiwan merely by weight of conventional ballistic missiles. China has LOTS of short & med range ballistic missiles. Enough to swamp any missile defense on Taiwan, IIRC.

3. The closer to China one gets, the less tenable is a strike on their mainland. China has LOTS of air defense hardware.

4. Question with any commie block hardware is: How much of it works at crunch time? At Stalingrad, for every Russian tank that made it to the battlefield, one was lost along the way to mechanical breakdown.

5. An attack by USA on China would likely end in a debacle, but an attack by China on US & allies in the neighborhood likely would be a debacle for China, despite China's first move advantage.

6. China handed major world powers the knife with which to cut its throat by building the Three Gorges Dam. Take that out, and China ENDS as a major power for a few centuries.


Regards,

deadlift_dude
“The very first essential for success is a perpetually constant and regular employment of violence.”
----Fred Rogers
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 784
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 784
It seems like China is flexing it muscles on the world stage...

Australia is just about fed up with their games...

India is exchanging face slapping on it border...

Japan has a military that is almost as big as China and is a US ally

New Zeeland is also an ally.

and anything the US gets into the Britts are always willing to jump in....

I really don't feel good about this. It seems like China is already at war with us now.... we just haven't started shooting yet.

you will know it's game on... when satellites in space start to disappear...


Well... we have come to the point.... where... the parasites are killing the host. It's only a matter of time now.

They only win.... when they cheat.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,038
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,038
Nor do I feel good about it. I doubt Trump will tolerate an invasion of Taiwan.


I am..........disturbed.

Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,347
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,347
War with China makes me think about retiring. (Air Force)

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,244
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,244
Originally Posted by jfruser
1. China does not have the capability to invade Taiwan. Power projection is HARD, especially moving troops over waters that might not be in one's control.

2. China has the capability to destroy Taiwan merely by weight of conventional ballistic missiles. China has LOTS of short & med range ballistic missiles. Enough to swamp any missile defense on Taiwan, IIRC.

3. The closer to China one gets, the less tenable is a strike on their mainland. China has LOTS of air defense hardware.

4. Question with any commie block hardware is: How much of it works at crunch time? At Stalingrad, for every Russian tank that made it to the battlefield, one was lost along the way to mechanical breakdown.

5. An attack by USA on China would likely end in a debacle, but an attack by China on US & allies in the neighborhood likely would be a debacle for China, despite China's first move advantage.

6. China handed major world powers the knife with which to cut its throat by building the Three Gorges Dam. Take that out, and China ENDS as a major power for a few centuries.


Agree on points 1 and 2

I'm not sure about point 3. Will have to defer to those that know their SAM capabilities better than I do.

Having lived in China for 2 years, I think point 4 is VERY interesting. So very much of their civilian infrastructure is just crap. But the Chinese also possess the capability of producing high quality goods. It's all a matter of "do they" when it comes to their military. Anecdotally, if it's made in China for their domestic market, it is going to be utter crap. An order of magnitude worse than what is being sold to foreign markets by foreign firms that have actual QC controls. But my Chinese designed/built Haval econo-crossover worked a treat for 1.5 years from purchase until we left. So I'd hate to count on utter failure of their war materiel.

Point 5 - yes. Economic MAD, where the "D" stands for deprivation. And in the case of the CCP, perhaps destruction.

Point 6 - yes, taking out the Three Gorges Dam would really put the hurt on China. But for nowhere near centuries. 10-20 years maybe? There's already a move away from hydropower to nuclear in China. At this point, I bet Xi curses Jiang for creating that particular boondoggle. But the Chinese are nothing if not resilient, and to paraphrase Mao and the cockroach general in the Freak brothers kitchen: "Who cares if we lose tens of millions, there are plenty more where they came from."

Last edited by Scott_Thornley; 08/09/20. Reason: a bit of clarification.


Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,672
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,672
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Nor do I feel good about it. I doubt Trump will tolerate an invasion of Taiwan.


They're waiting for President Biden and a traitorous Congress to assume office. The feckless fools will give up all of East Asia to them and kiss their asses.


TV has become nothing more than the Petri dish where this country grows its idiots.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 79,321
B
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
B
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 79,321
Would bailing out Taiwan by making war on China be worth the cost for America?

I don't think America has any allies that would join in on a war with China.

Besides,..America doesn't have to go to Asia to make war on Communists these days.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 25,430
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 25,430
I’ve got a bad feeling about this. I think the President’s cryptic statements the other day about him being “gone for awhile” and no other President is willing to do what he’s going to do to fix the problem. Things seem more clear...


�Politicians are the lowest form of life on earth. Liberal Democrats are the lowest form of politician.� �General George S. Patton, Jr.

---------------------------------------------------------
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,840
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,840
Originally Posted by blairvt
War with China makes me think about retiring. (Air Force)


One never truly retires from the military. My grandfather was called up for WWII at the age of 53.



Quando omni flunkus moritati
IC B3

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,650
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,650
As long as the invaders wear Covid masks... there is nothing to fear.


If you are not actively engaging EVERY enemy you encounter... you are allowing another to fight for you... and that is cowardice... plain and simple.



Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,650
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,650
...and the new IPhone 12s are not delayed for Black Friday sales.


If you are not actively engaging EVERY enemy you encounter... you are allowing another to fight for you... and that is cowardice... plain and simple.



Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,386
O
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,386
All I know is, I would hate to be a PLA grunt taking that boat ride across that strait. Short ride, long swim. If you clear the wreckage to begin with.

All the same, that guy might have it better than folks on the island under that rain of missiles. If it goes, it’s gonna be real ugly for a lot of people. Hopefully only Asians.

Watch the Norks get froggy as soon as it kicks off, too. 100k shells an hour on Seoul would be a sight to see. From elsewhere, of course.

Last edited by OldGrayWolf; 08/10/20.
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
Originally Posted by windridge
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Nor do I feel good about it. I doubt Trump will tolerate an invasion of Taiwan.


They're waiting for President Biden and a traitorous Congress to assume office. The feckless fools will give up all of East Asia to them and kiss their asses.


Yessir.

If Trump wins the election it’ll go back to Taiwan calling China “That breakaway republic on the mainland “.

In the event of open warfare, 3 Gorges Dam will be China’s first casualty.

Pray that none of this ever becomes reality.

As Bristoe said, ‘we don’t have to go half way around to find communists to fight ‘.


The degree of my privacy is no business of yours.

What we've learned from history is that we haven't learned from it.
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
Campfire Savant
Offline
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,008
That just what we need is a war right now.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,364
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,364
Remember, the COLD WAR never ended with Communist China. It continues. This is Cold War sabre rattling,


"The Democrat Party looks like Titanic survivors. Partying and celebrating one moment, and huddled in lifeboats freezing the next". Hatari 2017

"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." Han Solo
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
Originally Posted by hatari
Remember, the COLD WAR never ended with Communist China. It continues. This is Cold War sabre rattling,


To affect the elections.


The degree of my privacy is no business of yours.

What we've learned from history is that we haven't learned from it.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,364
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,364
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by hatari
Remember, the COLD WAR never ended with Communist China. It continues. This is Cold War sabre rattling,


To affect the elections.



Absolutely!


"The Democrat Party looks like Titanic survivors. Partying and celebrating one moment, and huddled in lifeboats freezing the next". Hatari 2017

"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." Han Solo
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 9,377
L
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
L
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 9,377
This has been brewing since Mao. Every American, even politicians, should be required to read 2 seminal books on Chinese history and philosophy and how it shapes their thinking.

The Hundred Year Marathon by Michael Pillsbury
On China by H. Kissinger

Enlightening and frightening, a true "Clash of Civilizations" They embrace deceit and misdirection as an art form and have been shaping their image in the US and around the world since 1949. We have been helping them do this, thinking they would embrace our values and systems.

They truly believe themselves superior to all others. "The Middle Kingdom" is not an obsolete belief system.

Interesting times coming.


mike r


Don't wish it were easier
Wish you were better

Stab them in the taint, you can't put a tourniquet on that.
Craig Douglas ECQC
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,162
S
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,162
If China makes a military move to take Taiwan, what should the US response be? Should we go to war to protect Taiwan? Should we send 100,000 troops to Taiwan?

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

551 members (1234, 12344mag, 1lessdog, 1OntarioJim, 01Foreman400, 007FJ, 69 invisible), 2,384 guests, and 1,210 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,665
Posts18,455,794
Members73,909
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.106s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9092 MB (Peak: 1.0850 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-19 18:54:06 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS