24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,562
G
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,562
After talking with Joel at Cameraland, I am contemplating moving from my Sony A6000 to the Olympus OM-D E-M5 MKII. Looking for thoughts or experience from any Olympus owners.
Thanks

GB1

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 671
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 671
I've not used the E-M5, but I do have the OMD E-M1 Mark II, and I really love it! I bought it initially because I wanted a good wildlife camera that would provide me with lots of "reach" and with good pixel density for reasonably high res images. The 300mm f/4 Pro lens for the system gave me exactly what I was looking for due to the MFT 2X crop factor, providing 600mm FF equivalent. The "5-axis sync" image stabilization (in-lens + in-body, working together) is truly amazing! I can take sharp handheld shots as slow as 1/20 shutter with the 300mm lens, which makes up for having "only" f/4 at WOA! It gives me something like 5 stops worth of compensation. Image stabilization is so good in fact that I seldom ever need to use a tripod even in fairly poor light. I pretty much just leave aperture set at f/4 all the time, shoot in manual mode with auto-ISO and only adjust shutter speed per the light conditions. The Oly 300mm f/4 Pro lens is an amazing wildlife lens, producing superb IQ!

My only real criticisms of the Oly MFT sensor is that its autofocus performance and high ISO noise suppression still doesn't quite compete with DSLR bodies and larger format sensors. In most cases, the outstanding image stabilization at least partially makes up for the noise suppression limitations at higher ISO by allowing me to use slower shutter speeds than I would ordinarily. This only becomes a problem for shooting in burst mode on moving subjects. Since I primarily shoot wildlife, landscapes, and portraits, this seldom limits IQ for me.

As long as you nail focus, burst speed is very fast, and I love the "pro capture" mode, giving me crazy fast FPS. Olympus lenses across the board are very good, and a couple of the Panasonic/Leica lenses for the MFT system are superb.

My only other reservation about Olympus in general is what the future holds for their stuff now that they've been bought out.

I would say that unless you're primarily a sports/action photographer or if you like to shoot extremely shallow depth of field, Oly and the MFT sensor lenses will serve most people's needs up to and including some professional work. Even if you need a very shallow DOF portrait type lens, the Panasonic-Leica Nocticron 42.5mm (85mm FF equivalent) f/1.2 lens for MFT has you covered there. It's as good or better than any FF portrait lens I've used.

Last edited by RifleDude; 08/12/20.

Ted

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

642 members (1234, 10gaugemag, 160user, 1lessdog, 007FJ, 1lesfox, 63 invisible), 2,792 guests, and 1,271 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,367
Posts18,469,093
Members73,931
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.128s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7902 MB (Peak: 0.8171 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 23:52:42 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS