|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,566
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,566 |
Anyone use one? Buddy has one on his .300 RUM that I've formed a few rounds throught. Currently building my own RUM for longer range and am debating going with one Pros/Cons?
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, used up, worn out, bottle of Jim Beam in one hand and a .45 in the other, loudly proclaiming WOW-- What a Ride!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 601
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 601 |
I haven't used one but know some people that have them. They seem fairly well made. I think the biggest con is they are matched to a specific load.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,567
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,567 |
Assembled in Canada in Chinese tubes with Japanese glass is what I was told but the owner of quigley-ford. I have a buddy that has 2 of them. He says they work as good as leupold cds. Just remember the reticle only works with the load you order. Buy a good shooting rifle to put it on. Owner of the company told me that if I bought one and had a problem he would just send me a new scope and let me keep the old one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,244
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,244 |
Watching Quigley right now.He don’t use no scope...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,964
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,964 |
You mean likes this???
Coyotes shot no waiting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,244
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,244 |
That’s a Quigley scope
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,262
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,262 |
i have one of these sights on my old Savage 99 T.D. 22 hi-power works good !
LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,893
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,893 |
I just left the range helping a buddy zero a new Quigley-Ford 5-20x50. It seemed to track well during adjustments but Larry was head over heels in awe of how clear it was. Obviously he hasn’t looked through a Kahles or Leica lately. I didn’t think it was exceptional but better than the Leupold he had before. The range marks on the reticle seemed to be hard to see and might not be the best outfit for shooting at game unless it is standing in the open in good light. I rate the reticle as poor in dawn/dusk situations. YMMV
Life Member NRA, RMEF, American Legion, MAGA. Not necessarily in that order.
|
|
|
|
141 members (257wthbylover, 300_savage, 5sdad, 2ndwind, 17CalFan, 21 invisible),
1,824
guests, and
975
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,599
Posts18,454,506
Members73,908
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|