I would just like to add that Shrapnal looks dapper in both outfits. And kudos to his makeup artist for sticking with it out there in the wilds. it must have been terrifying for him.
_______________________________________________________ An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack
I would just like to add that Shrapnal looks dapper in both outfits. And kudos to his makeup artist for sticking with it out there in the wilds. it must have been terrifying for him.
Roy,
It is Shrapnel. Not shrapnal . Do you not have spell check?
Happy Trails
Bob
FUGK CCP
It’s time to WAKE UP GOD BLESS THE USA WWG1WGA THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES
I don’t want things becoming any more caustic than they have.
This thread is now closed.
Does that work?
Is there a good-better-best scenario for closing a thread? If so, what makes better better than good but less better than best? Is best twice as good as better and four times as good (or better) than good? If good is good enough, why is better or best even needed? If good isn't good enough, why would you call it good, shouldn't it be called inadequate? What if there was a point system for posts, would that be good? Or better or best? Or not good better or best at all.
*asking for a friend
Last edited by Fireball2; 09/27/20.
_______________________________________________________ An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack
I don’t want things becoming any more caustic than they have.
This thread is now closed.
Does that work?
Is there a good-better-best scenario for closing a thread? If so, what makes better better than good but less better than best? Is best twice as good as better and four times as good (or better) than good? If good is good enough, why is better or best even needed? If good isn't good enough, why would you call it good, shouldn't it be called inadequate? What if there was a point system for posts, would that be good? Or better or best? Or not good better or best at all.
*asking for a friend
Take your meds
FUGK CCP
It’s time to WAKE UP GOD BLESS THE USA WWG1WGA THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES