|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,461
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,461 |
20 years??? I know you meant 20 yards....but that was funny!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,461
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,461 |
20 years??? I know you meant 20 yards....but that was funny!!
Last edited by CGPAUL; 11/16/20.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512 |
RE: the suggestion of a heavy AB in 6mm......My Go to is the 95 BT, you should find all you need, near and far, soft or hard targets...shoulders or lungs......
Hanco- in several 270s I ran, the 150 BT was my Go to, always outshot 130s. Today, I would run a 140 AB and expect accuracy and on game performance. Same held true in 7 RM for me, mine liked 150-162s......never did great with 140s. 1/2 MOA with 150 BTs.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,624
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,624 |
Mule Deer, do Interbonds perform similar to Accubonds? I use the 129 Interbond 6.5 mm at 2750 fps velociry. In my experience, Interbonds don't shed quite as much weight, but tend to open a bit wider. If I can get them to shoot in a particular rifle, I prefer them to Accubonds. I've not seen stellar accuracy from either. Both have worked very well on animals though. No complaints at all. That's also my general experience with both--but have had better overall luck getting AccuBonds to shoot well. Over half a dozen different cartridges in 10 rifles or so, I've not really had much of an accuracy issue with AB's......................some even bugholing with 3 shots. I know it's not 10 shots but....................WRGAF. Works for me for a hunting rifle. MM
|
|
|
|
|
571 members (10Glocks, 10ring1, 12344mag, 007FJ, 10gaugemag, 06hunter59, 52 invisible),
2,427
guests, and
1,206
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,242
Posts18,466,861
Members73,925
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
