Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Don't punch a K9 cop (video)

Good dog.

Felon best be ambi, he aint going to be flogging his jelly bean for a spell!

that would be a big


that's ok sugar. Bad video go away now.

Hope he keeps a big tin of doggie treats in his patrol vehicle.

What ever happened to a night stick to the shins to get cooperation?

commie-crat govs, mayors, town counsel, and da's!

Noticed that as well. K9 was having a good time !

cops go to prison now for that and any previously court approved compliance holds. Verbal compliance or deadly force. Watching the news much this summer?

Hahaha! That’s a lesson he’ll remember

make a list of cops that went to prison for whacking a guy with a night stick

Yes Sir! What's black and tan and looks good on a [bleep]? Looks like the cop still had a hard time getting the dfn under control, even though his partner had the other arm secured! More weight room, less donuts are in order LOL!

You are a special kind of stupid!

GS/Malinois crosses are the NavySeals of k9s

Looks like I can’t watch the video. Says I have been temporarily banned from the website leak reality

No clue why. Never been to it before

Dang wanted to watch the video too

"...uhhhhh, why did he come by himself? He should've brought backup..."

Looked to me like he had all the backup he needed. Atta boy!

The commentary from the two taking the video is hilarious.

That [bleep] wasn't expecting that! Good show! Only thing better would have been TWO DOGS!!

No he's completely wrong. When you get put on a jury you have a duty and that duty is to follow what the LAW says, not what your bleeding heart tells you. If you can't do that go home to your safe place.

Of course he's having a good time, he's doing what he has been taught is funtime!!

Excessive, Over the top use of force by the cop. This kind of stuff is why cops are hated.

As recently as 1972, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said that the jury has an " unreviewable and irreversible power... to acquit in disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial judge.... (US vs Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1139 (1972))

Or as this same truth was stated in a earlier decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Maryland: "We recognize, as appellants urge, the undisputed power of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as given by the judge, and contrary to the evidence. This is a power that must exist as long as we adhere to the general verdict in criminal cases, for the courts cannot search the minds of the jurors to find the basis upon which they judge. If the jury feels that the law under which the defendant is accused, is unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason which appeals to their logic of passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision." (US vs Moylan, 417 F 2d 1002, 1006 (1969)).