24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
DONT EVER TRY THIS AT HOME....or anywhere else for that matter !
Read the first line. If any questions, read the first line again.
Hopefully thats enough disclaimer.

We all know that large magnum rifle primers are “hotter” than a small pistol primer. Particularly a WLRM compared to a Rem 5 1/2.
Todays test used a 308 I have built for myself. Rem 700 action, Lilja barrel.
First string: Starline brass, Rem 5 1/2 primer, 34 grains H4198, 168 MK. Average speed for four five shot groups was 2403 fps. This load is in the Hodgdon book.
Second string: Hornady brass, WLRM, 34 grains H4198, 168 MK. Average speed for four five shot groups was 2394 fps.
Slower with a magnum rifle primer than a small standard pistol primer.
Both loads shot well, neither being better. If I had shot both strings at the same target, group would have been less that 1.25 inch.


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
GB1

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Running the same test with H4895 in a few minutes.


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,040
E
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
E
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,040
Silly question, doesn't the rifle's firing pin puncture the small pistol primer?


Life Member SCI
Life Member DSC
Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association

Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell

Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard

Ken
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,211
P
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,211
Interesting data. Do you have a way to measure pressure? I remember part of an Rick Jamison article on primers differences. He measured large differences in peak pressure between primer types and brands that otherwise showed small velocity differences. I think he attributed it to the varying brisance properties of the primers.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,125
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,125
Aren't the 5 1/2's small pistol magnum primers?

The Remington 5 1/2 Small Mag Pistol Primers are made with a very closely controlled, specifically formulated chemical mixture to ensure that no matter the powder, ignition is always fast and consistent. The primers are made with a three legged design that gives the largest area for the flash and a bigger striking area for the firing pin. The 5 1/2 Small Mag Pistol Primers are designed and tested to function in extreme temperature ranges from -20°F to +150°F. Each 5 1/2 Small Mag Pistol Primer is produced to exacting tolerances with a deviation no larger than .0003 ounces. All 2 5 1/2 Small Mag Pistol Primers are visually inspected and undergo critical ballistic tests.

Summary

The Remington 5 1/2 Small Mag Pistol Primer is a premier tripod designed flash cup with a larger than standard striking area that ensures positive fast ignition of most all available powders with a weight consistency of .0003 ounces. All 5 1/2 Small Pistol Primers are tested in controlled scientific environments for ballistics performance and quality. The 5 1/2 Small Pistol Primer will perform from -20°F to +150°F to ensure no matter where you use them, they will perform at the top level.

Specifications and Features:

Designed To Perform From -20°F To +150°F
Weight Checked To .0003 Oz
100% Visually Inspected
Tripod Anvil Design Gives Large Flash And Larger Striking Area

IC B2

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,219
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,219

Charlie,
Did you see a significant difference in ES between the two primers/loads?


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Here is the new data:
Again, dont do this at home !
Starline brass Rem 5 1/2 primer, 42 grains H4895, 168 MK...four five shot groups. Average speed 2592 fps
Hornady brass, WLRM, 42 grains H4895, 168 MK....four five shot groups. Average speed 2597 fps.


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Phasmid
I can measure pressure but I didnt want to spend the time or the money today . grin
Charlie


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Aalf
The primers I have make no mention of being magnum. Nowhere. Neither on the case box or the individual boxes. I would speculate that if they were considered “magnum” then Remington would have noted that somewhere on the package. But who knows......we are talking about Remington.. grin
Charlie


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Alpinecrick
On the H4198, one was 12 SD and the other 11 SD but I dont remember which.
Charlie


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
IC B3

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Thanks for the information, Charlie. What was the ballpark ambient temperature where you were doing the shooting?


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Its about 36 degrees F here today .


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Elkhunterm
Not a one.


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,125
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,125
Originally Posted by Charlie_Sisk
Aalf
The primers I have make no mention of being magnum. Nowhere. Neither on the case box or the individual boxes. I would speculate that if they were considered “magnum” then Remington would have noted that somewhere on the package. But who knows......we are talking about Remington.. grin
Charlie

Funny, in my googling around, I found pictures showing boxes that don't show them as magnum, but the descriptions say they are.

Then I found this post on another site from 6/2020:

Figured I would make a post about these Remington 5 1/2 small pistol primers. I bought some a while back. I was loading some 9mm early last week and used some of the 5 1/2s I bought to test out. I didn't get to load them that day so they went in with other primed cases I had ready....pretty much all CCI SP. I usually keep around 600-700 9mm cases size and primed and ready for loading at any given time. So after I loaded up 200 rounds, I came across some Remington small pistol 1 1/2 primers in a store. So I wondered what the difference was. The general consensus online was the 5 1/2 primers are magnum. Well, they don't say magnum on the box. I do use SP magnum, and have plenty in CCI and Win...but use them in 357 Mag. So now I get aggravated as I'm thinking I'll gonna have to pull all those rounds apart to find those "magnum" primers somehow. I did go through all my primed cases, very time consuming. I'm pretty sure I found over half of them from what I could see through the flash hole, comlared to the color and appearance of the anvil of new primers in the box. Did some more online research, searched Remington's site, no additional info on the differences. Just says not to use the 1 1/2 primers in higher pressure rounds like 357 Mag, 357 Sig, 40 S&W. I found where others stated the 5 1/2 primers were not magnum, but just a thicker cup. So I ended up just calling Remington today myself. They told me they are NOT magnum primers, but just a thicker cup for higher pressures. Just standard small pistol, same amount and mix of priming compound used in the 1 1/2. A lot of people believe they are magnum, just wanted to put it out there that they are NOT per Remington.



Now if you want more confusion, JB says otherwise:

http://www.sksboards.com/smf/index.php?topic=56422.0

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,040
E
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
E
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,040
Originally Posted by Charlie_Sisk
Elkhunterm
Not a one.

Thanks Charlie.


Life Member SCI
Life Member DSC
Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association

Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell

Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard

Ken
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,080
M
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,080
Originally Posted by Charlie_Sisk
DONT EVER TRY THIS AT HOME....or anywhere else for that matter !
Read the first line. If any questions, read the first line again.
Hopefully thats enough disclaimer.

We all know that large magnum rifle primers are “hotter” than a small pistol primer. Particularly a WLRM compared to a Rem 5 1/2.
Todays test used a 308 I have built for myself. Rem 700 action, Lilja barrel.
First string: Starline brass, Rem 5 1/2 primer, 34 grains H4198, 168 MK. Average speed for four five shot groups was 2403 fps. This load is in the Hodgdon book.
Second string: Hornady brass, WLRM, 34 grains H4198, 168 MK. Average speed for four five shot groups was 2394 fps.
Slower with a magnum rifle primer than a small standard pistol primer.
Both loads shot well, neither being better. If I had shot both strings at the same target, group would have been less that 1.25 inch.


Thanks for reporting the test, Charlie--partly because it fits into my experience that primer differences tend to matter most in either very small or very large cartridges, and especially not with extruded powders. Just one question: Did you weigh the two brands of brass?

Don't know if there's a more "medium" cartridge than the .308 with 165-168 grain bullets.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,792
H
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
H
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,792
Originally Posted by Charlie_Sisk
DONT EVER TRY THIS AT HOME....or anywhere else for that matter !
Read the first line. If any questions, read the first line again.
Hopefully thats enough disclaimer.

We all know that large magnum rifle primers are “hotter” than a small pistol primer. Particularly a WLRM compared to a Rem 5 1/2.
Todays test used a 308 I have built for myself. Rem 700 action, Lilja barrel.
First string: Starline brass, Rem 5 1/2 primer, 34 grains H4198, 168 MK. Average speed for four five shot groups was 2403 fps. This load is in the Hodgdon book.
Second string: Hornady brass, WLRM, 34 grains H4198, 168 MK. Average speed for four five shot groups was 2394 fps.
Slower with a magnum rifle primer than a small standard pistol primer.
Both loads shot well, neither being better. If I had shot both strings at the same target, group would have been less that 1.25 inch.


Any difference in case capacity between Starline and Hornady?

Thanks,

John


If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,219
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,219
Originally Posted by Mule Deer


Thanks for reporting the test, Charlie--partly because it fits into my experience that primer differences tend to matter most in either very small or very large cartridges, and especially not with extruded powders. Just one question: Did you weigh the two brands of brass?

Don't know if there's a more "medium" cartridge than the .308 with 165-168 grain bullets.


John
In the case of the large cartridges, was that with faster burning powders? If so, would that suggest faster burning powders are more sensitive to primer types and brands?


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,080
M
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,080
aalf,

Don't see where Remington 5-1/2 primers were mentioned that link. Also, please not that "article" was put together from SOME of my info and a variety of other sources.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,337
I didnt weigh any of that brass. I’ll try to remember next time.
Charlie


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

560 members (10ring1, 1beaver_shooter, 10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 1234, 60 invisible), 2,395 guests, and 1,179 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,320
Posts18,468,438
Members73,928
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.117s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8996 MB (Peak: 1.0384 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-25 16:48:47 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS