Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire FBI investigates National Guard members

Of course!!!

Remember during the Halfican’s administration, we had a real domestic terrorist at Fort Hood the Colonel who shot up and murdered several of our troops. Those in charge knew he was a Muslim POS, and didn’t do a damn thing about it.
But now they want to treat regular God-fearing American soldiers like their terrorists now ???😡
The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds!😡

The only REAL Threat to Hiden Biden is From Kamala the HO.

She’d poison that stupid SOB in a heartbeat to be POTUS.

FBI Director Wray suddenly remembered what happened to Anwar Sadat, most likely?

Kamala ain't gonna do anything to poor old Joe. She probably knows the schedule for when she's gonna assume the presidency. They already have the script written and she just has to follow it.

If DC had their fourth point of contact in order, a select number of NG "persons" could have already been vetted for such an occasion. This vetting after the recent,orchestrated debacle is nothing more than a witch hunt and some members of the NG are going to be put on the burner because of it! It's going to suck to be them!

Anyone that would consider TRH or criscoe dangerous would probably not consider Mac Sage's real world experience to be valid. I think it is funny that the dems are this afraid and showing their weakness and hypocrisy to the world.


mike r

I never indicated that his real world experience is invalid. But he's looking at a leaf instead of seeing the tree.

That can't be true, Squish says that at least 50% voted for Biden............Some one's math is fuzzy......

War is coming. Right to your front door. Know who and where the enemy is in your backyard.

Wonder what DOD actually thinks.


https://twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/1351212762974851077




The last part sure jumped out at me.

I am not so fond of those that "look to overturn the U.S. Constitution".

But it's was probably just a typo.

The problem is, they so not report to the FBI. They report to the sitting President, Trump!

In a properly configured federal government they do.

But that's not what we have since the coup.

In other branches of the goverment we have seen much treason, but not from the military.

This is why the next two days will be pivotal.

Big difference between deep vetting the 10s, 100s, whatever the number might be that would have close, armed access to a POTUS, and checking online social media of the hourly workers called up to spend a week standing on a DC street.

Local news:


Most civilians would be forgiven if they believed that when you join the National Guard, you’re vetted for fitness, patriotism, and duty to country, and that you wouldn’t have to be re-vetted for patriotism and duty prior to an assignment.

But National Guard members being assigned to the inauguration this week received another layer of scrutiny, just to make sure they are not one of the insurrectionists they would be guarding against in the nation’s capital.

Late in 2020, Alaska Guardsmen were asked via email if they wanted to volunteer for the assignment to D.C. to take part in the events around the Inauguration. That was before America witnessed the citizen siege on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

About 80 of them volunteered, and it appears most of them are on their way to DC on Sunday, Jan. 17.

“The roughly 25,000 National Guardsmen deployed to the U.S. capital to ensure President-elect Joe Biden is able to be sworn in peacefully went through an additional background check to weed out any whiff of domestic extremism,” Major Gen. William Walker told a national security reporter from DefenseOne.com. (Italics ours). Walker, pictured above, is the 23rd commanding general of the District of Columbia National Guard.

The extra layer of security is more of a deep dive into guardsmen’s backgrounds than when they initially enlisted, he said, describing it as “another layer” of security above and beyond the continuous monitoring of the force.

That likely means poking around into social media activity of guardsmen, or social clubs, and memberships.

Update: Associated Press is reporting that the FBI vetted all guard members before allowing them to go to D.C.

The vetting process, spurned by worries from defense officials, was confirmed by Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, according to AP.

”We’re continually going through the process, and taking second, third looks at every one of the individuals assigned to this operation,” McCarthy is quoted as saying. “The question is, is that all of them? Are there others? We need to be conscious of it and we need to put all of the mechanisms in place to thoroughly vet these men and women who would support any operations like this.”

One guardsman likened it to sending all Japanese-American fighters in World War II to Italy because of the perception they could not be trusted.

Members of the National Guard, unlike those in the active duty military, do not relinquish their First Amendment rights, and so many of them may still express their opinions on social media platforms.

Must Read Alaska reached out to members of the Guard, who said they had never before seen additional screening on political grounds.

Walker may demand more screening, but it’s up to Alaska Maj. Gen. Torrence W. Saxe to accept the task and the purity test conditions with it. Saxe is the Adjutant General of the Alaska National Guard.

It’s unclear if Saxe was told of the extra screening that would be applied. Must Read Alaska has requested a comment. This story will be updated with his comments.

https://mustreadalaska.com/national-guard-used-political-purity-test-on-guardsmen-prior-to-dc-trip/

They must prove to be "reliable" party members.

POTUS is just one of many that will attend this "virtual" inauguration.

One knuckle head of many different political affiliations with an M-4 could do a lot of damage to the future of gun rights.

But then I suspect a lot of proper vetting went on before the Guardsmen ever left their state.



According to DOD they have to like the Constitution.

Again a well written and reasonable response from a well respected member of the 'Fire. Thanks you, Sir.




But what irks me is the story as it is presented in the media and the implication, by design (I feel), that military veterans are NOT to be trusted. Just like Senator Feinstein of California saying, "basically all veterans are insane" to Janet Napolitano never discussing one of her regional centers warning that "retuning veterans" were ripe for recruitment in domestic terror organizations. To sum up what is bothering me is that there seems to be a deliberate campaign to sew negative stereotypes about veterans to use against them in the future. Some of us have lived through that before, especially in blue states.

I’d be interested in how many Guardsmen (and women) will be DQ’d as a result of the “vetting” and unable to go with their unit? I’d also love to know the reasons surrounding their DQ, ie how many from BLM versus President Trump supporters AND does the distrust in them for this mission disqualify them for future missions?

I assume, like the rest of the population, that virtually all Guardsmen have a political persuasion/bias one way or the other and if one of them decides to shoot their “enemy” (a Guardsman of the opposite political party) it could get very ugly and a politician wasn’t even the target.