|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,880
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,880 |
185 gr TTSX killed springbok to Eland for me I think the 185 TTSX would be a good choice on the lighter end and you could get the speed up pretty good.
NRA Endowment Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748 |
Too many to choose from.
160 TTSX would be Da bomb. One of my fav 338-06 bullets. Not sure my first choice for elk, but would probably not bounce off. Very accurate in my gun. DF The 160 TTSX does quite a number on elk. ...and Kudu, and Gemsbok, and Waterbuck. etc. If you want a very really big wound channel from a 338 bullet, the 160 is a great choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 351
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 351 |
I would prefer the 210 Partitions as well and would hunt hi and low for them. However I agree with the others that mentioned them....160 or 185 TTSX. Great bullets. Good luck and have fun! Tom
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,220
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,220 |
Surprised the 215 grn Sierra didn't get more mention. Always had good luck with it in 2 - 338WM, and a friend loads it exclusively for his 338-378. Has taken antelope through elk with it and never a problem.
I'm currently running the 225 ttsx for elk because I ran into a good deal and bought a pile. They're accurate and good performers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,575
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,575 |
I would prefer the 210 Partitions as well and would hunt hi and low for them. However I agree with the others that mentioned them....160 or 185 TTSX. Great bullets. Good luck and have fun! Tom Found a LGS with a box of each yesterday. ON my bench now
I do not entertain hypotheticals. The world itself is vexing enough. -- Col. Stonehill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,896
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,896 |
For me this is the little engine that could...BC lacking but shoots way flatter than I thought it would..
You better be afraid of a ghost!!
"Woody you were baptized in prop wash"..crossfireoops
Woody
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748 |
For me this is the little engine that could...BC lacking but shoots way flatter than I thought it would.. What velocities you getting? And, how have they worked for you on animals? I never did try them with my -06.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,896
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,896 |
What velocities you getting? And, how have they worked for you on animals? I never did try them with my -06.
So far I've only used the Barnes data for the 185 gr TSX in this AI version bumped up a half grain which launches the 160gr a tad over 3K with both H4895 {56.grs} & IMR4064 {58.5grs} both are dead nutts accurate..Only dispatched a late season WT doe and a couple of song dogs but most impressive results. I shoot shoulders only the doe was 167 yds lazed and dropped like a rock at the shot..Saw the bullet impact some 60 ft or so behind her just glad there weren't others in the way !
You better be afraid of a ghost!!
"Woody you were baptized in prop wash"..crossfireoops
Woody
|
|
|
|
485 members (160user, 10Glocks, 10gaugemag, 1beaver_shooter, 17CalFan, 1lesfox, 40 invisible),
2,344
guests, and
1,070
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,494
Posts18,452,415
Members73,901
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|