|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413 |
https://www.proxibid.com/Firearms-M...n-14433-revolver/lotInformation/61025557Gun letters from Colt. Butt is marked USMC. USMC deliveries started in 1909 Colt says this serial# was shipped to NYC dealer in 1906. USMC guns did not have 7&1/2" bbls. Will see when I get it. Wondering if serial number on frame/crane matches up ? Colt has no "rebuild/modification" records. Fun stuff !
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,523
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,523 |
That was a long time ago, and even back then, there were custom gunsmiths who would alter guns to suit the owner's wants/desires. That one may have been accosted by one of those gunsmiths.
You can roll a turd in peanuts, dip it in chocolate, and it still ain't no damn Baby Ruth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,076
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,076 |
The Colt emblem is double stamped. Was that common?
If it shoots good, I’d love to have it, but I wouldn’t buy it for an original, factory price.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413 |
No custom gunsmith involved as the revolver matches the Colt letter in all aspects. 44 Russian/Special targets 2nd and 1st model.
Last edited by NYNY; 05/17/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,076
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,076 |
No custom gunsmith involved as the revolver matches the Colt letter in all aspects. 44 Russian/Special targets 2nd and 1st model. Awesome guns, book, pic!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 478
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 478 |
I wonder if there was a USMC base near the dealer that recieved that piece from Colt?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284 |
My guess is that the double-stamp indicates somebody "freshening" the markings and that the USMC indicates somebody that thought a Marine Corps gun would bring a premium.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284 |
Basically, those markings are "damage". The records indicate it was shipped commercially and that's what all the collectors will go by. End of story.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413 |
Some thoughts:
1. Were anyone to fake a USMC CNS they would not mark it as this one is. 2. The double strike means nothing as I doubt anyone has exact duplicates of the Colt dies. 3. All the parts and features are correct for a 1906 revolver.
As this revolver was made before the USMC contract was executed in bulk, I'd suggest it may have been a "trials" gun to test all the features before mass production started.
None of the markings are engraved, all roll stamped which no faker could do. Additionally no other CNS guns have surfaced with identical butt markings although the fonts are like production guns.
The NY firm receiving the gun was a big outfit whose records are now held by G&H.
Mullin notes in the book that at least two of the USMC spec guns were bought privately thru civilian outlets, raising another possibility.
G&H wants $100 to check the old records, so I may call them to see if they have any for Colts.
To label what may be a rare gun as "damaged" with no evidence reflect poorly on the accuser.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 478
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 478 |
It was somewhat common at one time for service men to purchase their own handguns. Occasionally even receiving one as a gift. Especially prior to being shipped out.
If the retailer was close to a base. Maybe.... Maybe not...
Im not a collector. Just a reader. I recall a similar story about a mystery pistol. But I cant remember the details.
I once new a guy had USMC tattooed on his arm. Maybe not a stretch for one of their prestigious members to want it on their new Colt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284 |
Some thoughts:
1. Were anyone to fake a USMC CNS they would not mark it as this one is. 2. The double strike means nothing as I doubt anyone has exact duplicates of the Colt dies. 3. All the parts and features are correct for a 1906 revolver.
As this revolver was made before the USMC contract was executed in bulk, I'd suggest it may have been a "trials" gun to test all the features before mass production started.
None of the markings are engraved, all roll stamped which no faker could do. Additionally no other CNS guns have surfaced with identical butt markings although the fonts are like production guns.
The NY firm receiving the gun was a big outfit whose records are now held by G&H.
Mullin notes in the book that at least two of the USMC spec guns were bought privately thru civilian outlets, raising another possibility.
G&H wants $100 to check the old records, so I may call them to see if they have any for Colts.
To label what may be a rare gun as "damaged" with no evidence reflect poorly on the accuser.
Nobody's "accusing" anybody of anything. Opinion was proffered, as was requested. If you know more than everybody, why ask?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,167
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,167 |
I once bought some machinery from the estate of a gunsmith who was known for his fantastic collection of rare Lugers and Walthers. Among his equipment was a roll marking machine and a bunch of dies. He also had partially finished counterfeit dies he was working on at the time of his death.
Not saying that’s what’s going on here but to illustrate that one should never assume that something would be too hard to fake.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661 |
I once bought some machinery from the estate of a gunsmith who was known for his fantastic collection of rare Lugers and Walthers. Among his equipment was a roll marking machine and a bunch of dies. He also had partially finished counterfeit dies he was working on at the time of his death.
Not saying that’s what’s going on here but to illustrate that one should never assume that something would be too hard to fake. Roll stamps for all of the big names are pretty common. There are those who use them for restoration, but most are using them for forgeries. Colt's are probably the most commonly forged of all the big names. There's an old saying... Of the 500 Singer 1911's that were made, only about 2,000 survive today. It works with pretty much any model of commonly counterfeited guns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413 |
FYIs:
1. Colt never used a roll stamp like the one on the grip frame bottom for USMC CNSs.
2. The side plate roll stamp is correct for a 1906 made gun but not for a USMC one.
Kinda silly to fake something that doesn't match a real one eh ?
The rarest 100% correct CNS in any "stock configuration" could bring 5 grand on a good day. Hardly comparable to a Singer 1911, more like a Remington Rand one.
G&H no longer provides the service so the mystery remains.
Sent a note to Mullin, hope he has some thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413 |
44 Special factory nickle that letters. Grips not original. Not fun to shoot w/Keith loads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697 |
Some thoughts:
1. Were anyone to fake a USMC CNS they would not mark it as this one is. 2. The double strike means nothing as I doubt anyone has exact duplicates of the Colt dies. 3. All the parts and features are correct for a 1906 revolver.
As this revolver was made before the USMC contract was executed in bulk, I'd suggest it may have been a "trials" gun to test all the features before mass production started.
None of the markings are engraved, all roll stamped which no faker could do. Additionally no other CNS guns have surfaced with identical butt markings although the fonts are like production guns.
The NY firm receiving the gun was a big outfit whose records are now held by G&H.
Mullin notes in the book that at least two of the USMC spec guns were bought privately thru civilian outlets, raising another possibility.
G&H wants $100 to check the old records, so I may call them to see if they have any for Colts.
To label what may be a rare gun as "damaged" with no evidence reflect poorly on the accuser.
Nobody's "accusing" anybody of anything. Opinion was proffered, as was requested. If you know more than everybody, why ask? Classic Larry Root. It's how he rolls. Bitchin' or braggin' is his only settings...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,607
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,607 |
Thanks, FOST...Now I know..
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 413 |
Perhaps if you have a severe case of DNS, you should not invade others' threads.
Both now blocked.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,697 |
Poor poor Root.... always the perpetual victim...
Hey, how's that lawsuit against Rick Bin and the Campfire going??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 19,495
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 19,495 |
http://griffinhowe.com/researchyourfirearm/Their historian/researcher has retired. They'll resume the service when/if they can replace.
Retired cat herder.
|
|
|
|
566 members (1lesfox, 11point, 007FJ, 12344mag, 160user, 10gaugemag, 56 invisible),
2,910
guests, and
1,239
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,355
Posts18,468,899
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|