24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
W
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
W
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
Hello there, I’m new to the forum so forgive me if I do not ask the right questions. I recently acquired a kar98a small ring barreled action off gunbroker. It is chambered for .220 swift. I’ve got some work to do with the bolt to continue sporterizing it, my question is this, would this rifle be safe to shoot the .220 swift cartridge? I’ve seen on many forums that people have had small ring Mexican mausers chambered for 22-250 and I figured they were similar in pressures. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

GB1

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,507
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,507
I would shoot if the headspace was okay and the gun was otherwise sound. I'm no expert, but I still have all my fingers and both eyes after 35 years of playing with Mausers.


"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever."
-S. M. Stirling
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,137
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,137
If it is in good condition, I'd echo Theo Gallus' advice.

I have a 256 Newton that was built on a 1917 vintage Erfurt SR 98 and have no problems running maximum loads in it.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
z1r Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
I have no problem being the stick in the mud. A 62K PSI in an action that was only marginally safe for a 50 K psi cartridge isn't a good idea in my book. The Kar98a was discontinued by the Germans and no further development of the Small Ring, Large Thread receiver was pursued by them. the Poles continued to "improve" the concept right up until about 1930 but he advent of the Czech zv33 halted further development.

I would limit use of such receivers to cartridges with about 50K psi and which are used primarily during hunting season.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,686
E
EdM Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
E
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,686
Originally Posted by z1r
I have no problem being the stick in the mud. A 62K PSI in an action that was only marginally safe for a 50 K psi cartridge isn't a good idea in my book. The Kar98a was discontinued by the Germans and no further development of the Small Ring, Large Thread receiver was pursued by them. the Poles continued to "improve" the concept right up until about 1930 but he advent of the Czech zv33 halted further development.

I would limit use of such receivers to cartridges with about 50K psi and which are used primarily during hunting season.


I own one in 8x57 and follow the advice above. The 180 gr BT flies at 2600 fps via CFE223 (50 KPSI) in my custom 20" barreled rifle.


Conduct is the best proof of character.
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,075
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,075
Originally Posted by z1r
I have no problem being the stick in the mud. A 62K PSI in an action that was only marginally safe for a 50 K psi cartridge isn't a good idea in my book. The Kar98a was discontinued by the Germans and no further development of the Small Ring, Large Thread receiver was pursued by them. the Poles continued to "improve" the concept right up until about 1930 but he advent of the Czech zv33 halted further development.

I would limit use of such receivers to cartridges with about 50K psi and which are used primarily during hunting season.


My thoughts too. The only thing that separates them from previous small ring Mausers was its superior escaping gas handling characteristics. Primitive metallurgy for high intensity cartridges? Ok, but I'll stand back here and watch.


"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz
"Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
W
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
W
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
Alright thank you for all the information! I’ll try to find some other use for the 220 swift barrel. I have no idea why that barrel would have been put on that action to begin with. While I’m on the subject of that receiver. What would be a good caliber to substitute instead of the 220 swift? I’ve also read that some just put a 8mm mauser Barrel back onto the action. Some have done .257 Roberts, while others have tried 7mm mauser.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,075
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,075
7 or 8mm would be nifty. With .257 Roberts someone will come along and feed it a diet of +P loads for sure.


"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz
"Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,137
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,137
If you're worried about pressure, why not run the 220 Swift and 22-250 or 225 WIN speeds?

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
Its worth noting that the nominal receiver ring diameter on a Kar98a is within a whisker of that of a 1903 Springfield. 1.300" (Mauser) vs 1.305" (Springfield). The tolerance on that dimension means they are essentially the same. The Mauser has a better breeching design too, with much less casehead exposure. Some may say "oh yes, but what about barrel shank diameter?" but the difference there is small too, and the actual amount of steel surrounding the chamber is the same - save for the unsupported part of the case head on a Springfield. The same applies to a Winchester 54, for which the .220 Swift was developed, though its receiver ring is a tiny bit larger, at a nominal 1.34"

IC B3

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
z1r Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Its worth noting that the nominal receiver ring diameter on a Kar98a is within a whisker of that of a 1903 Springfield. 1.300" (Mauser) vs 1.305" (Springfield). The tolerance on that dimension means they are essentially the same. The Mauser has a better breeching design too, with much less casehead exposure. Some may say "oh yes, but what about barrel shank diameter?" but the difference there is small too, and the actual amount of steel surrounding the chamber is the same - save for the unsupported part of the case head on a Springfield. The same applies to a Winchester 54, for which the .220 Swift was developed, though its receiver ring is a tiny bit larger, at a nominal 1.34"


The issue itself is not in the receiver diameter or tread size but rather in the threading relief cut in the receiver meant for chip clearance. The same size clearance cut was used on the small ring Kar98a receiver as was used on the large ring Gew98. This proved to leave too little metal and contributed to a tendency of this model to spontaneously become takedown models during WWI. But hey.....

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
Originally Posted by z1r
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Its worth noting that the nominal receiver ring diameter on a Kar98a is within a whisker of that of a 1903 Springfield. 1.300" (Mauser) vs 1.305" (Springfield). The tolerance on that dimension means they are essentially the same. The Mauser has a better breeching design too, with much less casehead exposure. Some may say "oh yes, but what about barrel shank diameter?" but the difference there is small too, and the actual amount of steel surrounding the chamber is the same - save for the unsupported part of the case head on a Springfield. The same applies to a Winchester 54, for which the .220 Swift was developed, though its receiver ring is a tiny bit larger, at a nominal 1.34"


The issue itself is not in the receiver diameter or tread size but rather in the threading relief cut in the receiver meant for chip clearance. The same size clearance cut was used on the small ring Kar98a receiver as was used on the large ring Gew98. This proved to leave too little metal and contributed to a tendency of this model to spontaneously become takedown models during WWI. But hey.....


But yet the Germans kept them in production and in service throughout the war, and made about 1,500,000 of them. They even stayed in second line service long after the Kar 98 k was adopted, post WWI, and were adopted and produced by the Poles post WWI as well.

Do you have any more information about actual documented failures, in the manner described, during WWI?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
z1r Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Originally Posted by z1r
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Its worth noting that the nominal receiver ring diameter on a Kar98a is within a whisker of that of a 1903 Springfield. 1.300" (Mauser) vs 1.305" (Springfield). The tolerance on that dimension means they are essentially the same. The Mauser has a better breeching design too, with much less casehead exposure. Some may say "oh yes, but what about barrel shank diameter?" but the difference there is small too, and the actual amount of steel surrounding the chamber is the same - save for the unsupported part of the case head on a Springfield. The same applies to a Winchester 54, for which the .220 Swift was developed, though its receiver ring is a tiny bit larger, at a nominal 1.34"


The issue itself is not in the receiver diameter or tread size but rather in the threading relief cut in the receiver meant for chip clearance. The same size clearance cut was used on the small ring Kar98a receiver as was used on the large ring Gew98. This proved to leave too little metal and contributed to a tendency of this model to spontaneously become takedown models during WWI. But hey.....


But yet the Germans kept them in production and in service throughout the war, and made about 1,500,000 of them. They even stayed in second line service long after the Kar 98 k was adopted, post WWI, and were adopted and produced by the Poles post WWI as well.

Do you have any more information about actual documented failures, in the manner described, during WWI?


Don't read so well, huh. Comparing Polish receivers to German is apples to oranges. Get out your measuring tools and verify for yourself. Nothing I cite will be good enough. Been there, done that. Don't have the time to waste. If you want to build a high pressure round on a Kar98a action, feel free. I valued my customers' safety and built accordingly. You are free to do as you please.

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,732
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,732
How about a 6.5 Swede loaded to 96 levels?


What fresh Hell is this?
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
z1r Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Originally Posted by Pappy348
How about a 6.5 Swede loaded to 96 levels?


This would be a prudent build.

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,586
Originally Posted by z1r
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Originally Posted by z1r
Originally Posted by dan_oz
Its worth noting that the nominal receiver ring diameter on a Kar98a is within a whisker of that of a 1903 Springfield. 1.300" (Mauser) vs 1.305" (Springfield). The tolerance on that dimension means they are essentially the same. The Mauser has a better breeching design too, with much less casehead exposure. Some may say "oh yes, but what about barrel shank diameter?" but the difference there is small too, and the actual amount of steel surrounding the chamber is the same - save for the unsupported part of the case head on a Springfield. The same applies to a Winchester 54, for which the .220 Swift was developed, though its receiver ring is a tiny bit larger, at a nominal 1.34"


The issue itself is not in the receiver diameter or tread size but rather in the threading relief cut in the receiver meant for chip clearance. The same size clearance cut was used on the small ring Kar98a receiver as was used on the large ring Gew98. This proved to leave too little metal and contributed to a tendency of this model to spontaneously become takedown models during WWI. But hey.....


But yet the Germans kept them in production and in service throughout the war, and made about 1,500,000 of them. They even stayed in second line service long after the Kar 98 k was adopted, post WWI, and were adopted and produced by the Poles post WWI as well.

Do you have any more information about actual documented failures, in the manner described, during WWI?


Don't read so well, huh. Comparing Polish receivers to German is apples to oranges. Get out your measuring tools and verify for yourself. Nothing I cite will be good enough. Been there, done that. Don't have the time to waste. If you want to build a high pressure round on a Kar98a action, feel free. I valued my customers' safety and built accordingly. You are free to do as you please.


I think it may be you who doesn't read so well. You claimed "a tendency of this model to spontaneously become takedown models during WWI". That doesn't seem congruent with the facts that the Germans produced large numbers of these rifles, right up to the end of WWI, and indeed switched production over at a couple of their major factories from Gew 98 to Kar 98 as the war progressed, as the Kar 98 (aka 98a) was so popular, not just among the troops for whom it was originally designed, but regular infantry. It also doesn't seem congruent with the service of the rifle continuing well after WWI, nor the fact that Poland adopted them and made them - small ring, large barrel shank and all, off German blueprints and tooling - as well as making large ring actions.

All I asked you was whether you had any more information about the failures you claim occurred during WWI.

Or is it just another of those stories that are oft retold on the internet, like Chinese whispers, for which, when you dig, there is no actual evidence?

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
W
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
W
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
I didn’t mean to turn this into right and wrong just needed some information. I ended up removing the barrel and have installed it on my large ring receiver. Everything headspaced correctly and it is ready to go. As for the Kar98a receiver I’m think 6.5x55 or 7mm mauser. I’ll also need to find a small ring scope mount but I think a M96 scope mount might work not sure. Thank you all for your help though!

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
z1r Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
FWIW, I think you made the right decision. Yes, 1896 scope bases can be used.

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
W
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
W
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 273
Hey another question. This Kar98a action came with the ww1 triggerguard. Now my other triggers will not sit into that triggerguard. Are the triggers made for the kar98k and the gew98 different than the Kar98a?

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
z1r Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Originally Posted by Whiteghost109
Hey another question. This Kar98a action came with the ww1 triggerguard. Now my other triggers will not sit into that triggerguard. Are the triggers made for the kar98k and the gew98 different than the Kar98a?


Yes, the triggers are different. A Timney Model 306 will work.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

121 members (406_SBC, 444Matt, 450yukon, 257_X_50, 19rabbit52, 270winchester, 18 invisible), 1,935 guests, and 806 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,173
Posts18,465,380
Members73,925
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.069s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.9005 MB (Peak: 1.0430 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-24 06:31:15 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS