|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730 |
Looking for a set and forget (no dialing) light weight scope in the 2-8 3-9 power range. Narrowed down to these two scopes any others I should be looking at?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 518
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 518 |
I have both, both great and you can't go wrong. The Swarovski is my favorite scope and would be my first choice. If you can find a vortex razor LH 1.5-8 it is fantastic as well. I like it just about as much as the Swarovski.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730 |
I hated that vortex discontinued that scope I really like it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 541
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 541 |
I have a LNIB Leupold 2.5x8 posted in classifieds.
Check it out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,943
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,943 |
Looking for a set and forget (no dialing) light weight scope in the 2-8 3-9 power range. Narrowed down to these two scopes any others I should be looking at? Both are great little scopes. The only way you can get the 2.5-8 now is with a cds elevation turret. The Leupold 2-7 with the hunt plex reticle is worth looking at too. I really like it for a light weight.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730 |
I have a LNIB Leupold 2.5x8 posted in classifieds.
Check it out. Saw that but not buying till this spring. Just planing out my build right now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 95,303
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 95,303 |
I have a LNIB Leupold 2.5x8 posted in classifieds.
Check it out. Saw that but not buying till this spring. Just planing out my build right now. What are you going to have built?
Life Member SCI Life Member DSC Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association
Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard
Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730 |
Light-ish weight 30-06. Going back and forth on if I’ll build on a Husqvarna 1640, Tikka or Kimber
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,730 |
Also looking at colt CLRs
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 95,303
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 95,303 |
Ok, then the Z3 3x9 would be my choice between the two.
Just my opinion, build on the Husky action.
Life Member SCI Life Member DSC Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association
Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard
Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,043
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,043 |
The Trijicon Accupoint 3-9x40 gets great feedback and it weighs 12-13 ounces.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,177
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,177 |
More tube on the Z3 than the VX3i. That might be a factor mounting on a long action. The VX3i barely fit on my M77 .30-06. Very little wiggle room fore and aft.
Some people are educated beyond their intelligence.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,664
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,664 |
In my experience the 2.5x8 is too short for me on a long action. I would need a rail type base on a long action.
The Karma bus always has an empty seat when it comes around.- High Brass
There's battle lines being drawn Nobody's right if everybody's wrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,371
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,371 |
I have both and prefer the Z3, better optics and can be had with the wonderful 4a reticle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 4,491
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 4,491 |
In my experience the 2.5x8 is too short for me on a long action. I would need a rail type base on a long action. Agreed. As good a scope as it is, it is short for a long action. It will [probably] span a long action with normal rings, but it will end up where it ends up with next to no room for back and forth adjustment for eye relief. Even on a short action, extended bases or rings, or a pic rails, may be desirable to get it where you want it. On a long action, you WILL need a rail, or extended bases or rings to get it where you want it. That said, Leopold's various VX-3 in 2.5-8 have always been great. I've switched out several Burris scopes for VX-3HDs and now have several in 2.5-8 and 3.5-10. I have no complaints at all. I don't really care for the CDS-ZL knob on top, but it's not obtrusive and I have just set mine to forget. I've never used a Z3, but looking at the dimension, the 3-9 is actually 1/2" shorter than the Leopold VX-3HD 2.5-8. So, I 'm not sure it will span a long action any better than the 2.5-8. Of course, the way rings mount on a Tikka it may be a non-issue with that rifle, I don't know. But these shorter scopes can present an overcome-able challenge on more traditional open receiver long actions.
Last edited by 10Glocks; 09/03/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,457
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,457 |
I have a couple of 2.5-8’s on Rem long action 700’s and 721’s (300 H & H). If I had to choose, I’d rather have a Boone and Crockett reticle over the CDS. Even better, the B&C AND the CDS for playing at the range.
Last edited by navlav8r; 09/03/21.
NRA Life,Endowment,Patron or Benefactor since '72.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,108
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,108 |
I have a couple of 2.5-8’s on Rem long action 700’s and 721’s (300 H & H). If I had to choose, I’d rather have a Boone and Crockett reticle over the CDS. Even better, the B&C AND the CDS for playing at the range. All of this^^^ When time permits dialing can come in handy for hunting too. But for hunting, if I have to choose between a ballistic reticle or dialing, the ballistic reticle is what I want.
Casey
Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively... Having said that, MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,108
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,108 |
In my experience the 2.5x8 is too short for me on a long action. I would need a rail type base on a long action. Burris Zee rings and Weaver #40 mount neatly resolves that dilemma for M700's, can't remember the mount number for my M77's.
Casey
Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively... Having said that, MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,401
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,401 |
I have both and prefer the Z3, better optics and can be had with the wonderful 4a reticle. This. No contest glass wise and agree about 4a.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 571
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 571 |
Both good scopes but give me the Z3 with that wonderful 4A reticle.
Dyin' ain't much of a livin' boy - Josey Wales
|
|
|
658 members (10gaugemag, 12344mag, 160user, 10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 12308300, 60 invisible),
3,134
guests, and
1,256
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,187,742
Posts18,401,190
Members73,822
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|