|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,249
Campfire Kahuna
|
OP
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,249 |
to tyrannical governance, multiple choice question.
If you find yourself at odds with tyrannical overreach, say COVID protocols for example, you should-
1) reason with the offending party, try to persuade them to your way of thinking.
2) talk to their supervisor, if in that type of setting, explaining that as a sovereign citizen your opinion has exactly the same value as the tyrants, and must therefore be given the same consideration with individual liberty being the over-riding criteria in determining a course of action.
3) organize a peaceful protest to win the hearts and minds of the tyrants to your way of thinking
4) quit your job, begin fundraising several million dollars and campaign for a seat in government
5) Canvas your neighborhood door to door handing out tracts regarding Constitutional freedoms, rights, and responsibilities as it relates to tyrannical thought processes and loss of freedoms with government mandates
6) Start your own line of t-shirts with catchy, freedom-based phrases
7) If faced with loss of job or freedoms such as grocery shopping, start your own blog protesting the injustice of it all
8) write a book and go on a speaking tour
9) coordinate violent events directed at individuals or entities perceived to be the problem with other patriotic, like-minded individuals and execute plans to remedy the injustice being foisted on the population by any and all means necessary, at all cost up to and including life and liberty.
Of the 9 potential remedies listed above, which was successfully used (at great cost) to start the United States of America?
Hint: I'm pretty sure screen printing hadn't been invented yet, so t-shirts isn't it.
Last edited by Fireball2; 09/22/21.
_______________________________________________________ An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack
LOL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,649
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,649 |
These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o "May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,699
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,699 |
Those who would disrespect our flag have never been handed a folded one.
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
When in the Course of human events......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 26,430
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 26,430 |
FJB & FJT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,793
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,793 |
Napalm would probably work.
l told my pap and mam I was going to be a mountain man; acted like they was gut-shot. Make your life go here. Here's where the peoples is. Mother Gue, I says, the Rocky Mountains is the marrow of the world, and by God, I was right. - Del Gue
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,234
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,234 |
Peacful like Antifa, Maxine Waters, BLM, the Las Vegas shooter, the congressional ball game shooter.
You fuggin people better wake up !
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 10,840
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 10,840 |
Roy,
Drive your dually off a cliff
FUGK CCP
It’s time to WAKE UP GOD BLESS THE USA WWG1WGA THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,113
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,113 |
Roy,
Drive your dually off a cliff Actions speak louder than words.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,649
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,649 |
These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o "May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,539
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,539 |
There is no retreat but in submission and slavery!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,566
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,566 |
This is the only thing that will fix this.
Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 600
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 600 |
Who gave us a right to a job at a company we don't own, or to shop for groceries at a store we don't own? It seems to me the employers and business owners are the ones with the greivance. Which are you?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,249
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,249 |
When talking to a member of the opposition, keep in mind that he will think that when they have control, he, personally, will be in the ruling group. They never think that they will be in the oppressed group. 95% of them will be wrong.
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” ― George Orwell
It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 600
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 600 |
We don't want to become like those who think they are entitled to a "job" or a check, or that we ought to be able to dictate to people who own property in the form of businesses how they ought to run their business because we're a "stakeholder." That's the Marxist, prole argument.
A lot of businesses and employers want these mandates. They wanted to implement them themselves but were afraid of their workforce quitting. With federal-backing, they can implement and fear less because they suppose the workers will capitulate their opposition as hopeless. If the employers were against the mandates, they would resist them. No doubt some will, but the ones not resisting are the ones that support them and want them. Jabbed workers take less sick time off. They're more obedient. The employers don't care about long-term effects. They care about quarterly results. Worst case long-term is just less pension fund liability. Again, if they don't like the mandate, they will resist. If they don't, it's because they're for it.
So who is the real tyrant? The federal government or the employers that asked for and got a mandate risk-free and now consider the matter settled. Jab or walk. Is that tyranny? When a business does that instead of resisting because they never wanted to resist but wanted to make the mandate? Can companies tyrannize if they don't have the faculty of physical force? I suppose they're tyrannical about a lot of their other policies too then. Maybe stop working for tyrants?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 4,559
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 4,559 |
We don't want to become like those who think they are entitled to a "job" or a check, or that we ought to be able to dictate to people who own property in the form of businesses how they ought to run their business because we're a "stakeholder." That's the Marxist, prole argument.
A lot of businesses and employers want these mandates. They wanted to implement them themselves but were afraid of their workforce quitting. With federal-backing, they can implement and fear less because they suppose the workers will capitulate their opposition as hopeless. If the employers were against the mandates, they would resist them. No doubt some will, but the ones not resisting are the ones that support them and want them. Jabbed workers take less sick time off. They're more obedient. The employers don't care about long-term effects. They care about quarterly results. Worst case long-term is just less pension fund liability. Again, if they don't like the mandate, they will resist. If they don't, it's because they're for it.
So who is the real tyrant? The federal government or the employers that asked for and got a mandate risk-free and now consider the matter settled. Jab or walk. Is that tyranny? When a business does that instead of resisting because they never wanted to resist but wanted to make the mandate? Can companies tyrannize if they don't have the faculty of physical force? I suppose they're tyrannical about a lot of their other policies too then. Maybe stop working for tyrants?
Who says it's business owners that have asked for all of this? Lets see the proof.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 600
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 600 |
The proof is in their acquiescence. I'm not claiming they've all asked for it. If they're not resisting, then it's because it's what they wanted. A lot of the biggest businesses jumped on enforcing the mandates right away because they had wanted it all along. It's the governors and state's attorneys genral that are resisting because they rightly see it as a federal overreach and power grab. Businesses -- which ones are putting up any big resistance? A bunch of them have massive cash piles right now from extreme valuations thanks to insane Fed policies and fiscal stimulus by the trillions and trillions. If there was meaningful resistance, they'd be deploy some of that cash for a legal and political campaign effort. They wouldn't hesitate to do so for a variety of other regulatory challenges like gig worker classification, warehouse worker quota limits, social media censorship bans. Just this week, Lyft, American Airlines, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Uber, Match, and GoDaddy were all voicing their resistance to and activism against the abortion ban and constitutional-carry laws in Texas. Where is Corporate America's activism on these mandates? The logical conclusion is they don't oppose it.
|
|
|
|
115 members (44mc, 007FJ, 7mm_Loco, 10gaugemag, 35, Akhutr, 10 invisible),
1,508
guests, and
767
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,599
Posts18,454,564
Members73,908
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|