24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 13 of 23 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 22 23
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,812
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,812
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by copperking81
]

How so?


Well I don't really want to type out all the fact on a phone, but Zimmerman was attacked while he was on the phone with 911, then pulled a gun...after being physically assaulted. The GA guys decided to try and do some sort of citizens arrest for a something? Pulled a gun when the guy wouldn't stop and then blasted him when he went for the shotgun.

They made poor decisions and paid for them. Obviously


Both made a stop. Both were attacked. So are you saying the GA guys shouldn't have had their weapons exposed... that's the difference?


You are missing a glaring difference in the two cases. Review the charges against the Georgia boys and see if one of the charges might be what precipitated the whole affair.


Ok, which one?


False imprisonment is a felony in GA. Under GA self-defense laws there are three circumstances identified in which self-defense is not authorized. Surely this deep into the conversation you have troubled yourself with reading the applicable GA self defense laws right?


Since Georgia law allowed citizens arrest which allows citizens to detane law breakers. Then the false imprisonment is canceled out



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
BP-B2

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,295
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,295
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by copperking81
]

How so?


Well I don't really want to type out all the fact on a phone, but Zimmerman was attacked while he was on the phone with 911, then pulled a gun...after being physically assaulted. The GA guys decided to try and do some sort of citizens arrest for a something? Pulled a gun when the guy wouldn't stop and then blasted him when he went for the shotgun.

They made poor decisions and paid for them. Obviously


Both made a stop. Both were attacked. So are you saying the GA guys shouldn't have had their weapons exposed... that's the difference?


You are missing a glaring difference in the two cases. Review the charges against the Georgia boys and see if one of the charges might be what precipitated the whole affair.


Ok, which one?


False imprisonment is a felony in GA. Under GA self-defense laws there are three circumstances identified in which self-defense is not authorized. Surely this deep into the conversation you have troubled yourself with reading the applicable GA self defense laws right?


So how is that different from what Zimmerman did?


Zimmerman was keeping Trayvon in sight. He was not restricting his movement. He was not falsely imprisoning Trayvon. It's important to note that Florida is not Georgia. State law matters.

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 790
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 790
All three guilty of murder? Justice?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,295
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,295
I'll make it easy for you.

False imprisonment is a felony in GA. The Klan boys were convicted of false imprisonment.

Since you are too lazy to look it up, (b)(2) https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-3/article-2/16-3-21

That's why I have have been referring to the clan boys falsely imprisoning Arbery

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,181
M
Muffin Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,181
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by copperking81
]

How so?


Well I don't really want to type out all the fact on a phone, but Zimmerman was attacked while he was on the phone with 911, then pulled a gun...after being physically assaulted. The GA guys decided to try and do some sort of citizens arrest for a something? Pulled a gun when the guy wouldn't stop and then blasted him when he went for the shotgun.

They made poor decisions and paid for them. Obviously


Both made a stop. Both were attacked. So are you saying the GA guys shouldn't have had their weapons exposed... that's the difference?


You are missing a glaring difference in the two cases. Review the charges against the Georgia boys and see if one of the charges might be what precipitated the whole affair.


Ok, which one?


False imprisonment is a felony in GA. Under GA self-defense laws there are three circumstances identified in which self-defense is not authorized. Surely this deep into the conversation you have troubled yourself with reading the applicable GA self defense laws right?


Since Georgia law allowed citizens arrest which allows citizens to detane law breakers. Then the false imprisonment is canceled out





NOT 'Law Breakers', in general or of any kind, but those that you witnessed or have REASONABLE and PROBABLE grounds, known to have committed a FELONIUS act and are trying to evade/elude capture.............


"...A man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box..." Frederick Douglass, 1867

( . Y . )
IC B2

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,857
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,857
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by copperking81
]

How so?


Well I don't really want to type out all the fact on a phone, but Zimmerman was attacked while he was on the phone with 911, then pulled a gun...after being physically assaulted. The GA guys decided to try and do some sort of citizens arrest for a something? Pulled a gun when the guy wouldn't stop and then blasted him when he went for the shotgun.

They made poor decisions and paid for them. Obviously


Both made a stop. Both were attacked. So are you saying the GA guys shouldn't have had their weapons exposed... that's the difference?


You are missing a glaring difference in the two cases. Review the charges against the Georgia boys and see if one of the charges might be what precipitated the whole affair.


Ok, which one?


False imprisonment is a felony in GA. Under GA self-defense laws there are three circumstances identified in which self-defense is not authorized. Surely this deep into the conversation you have troubled yourself with reading the applicable GA self defense laws right?


So how is that different from what Zimmerman did?


Zimmerman was keeping Trayvon in sight. He was not restricting his movement. He was not falsely imprisoning Trayvon. It's important to note that Florida is not Georgia. State law matters.


So Trayvon attacked Zimmerman for simply keeping him in sight? In the GA guys video, at what point would you say they successfully restricted this movement?

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 790
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 790
I understand the false imprisionment is the pretence. So why weren't they others charged with false imprisionment rather then murder. I admit that I have not researched this but justification doesn't neccesarly equal justice.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,181
M
Muffin Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,181
Originally Posted by rem141r
why did they try all 3 dumbf-ucks together? wasn't the moe howard haircut guy just following and videoing dumbf-uck Sr and Jr?



Why were they all tried together???? For that answer you would need to query the Defense council....

WHY were they all tried with charges of Felony Murder? Because ALL three participated in the Felony of false arrest and someone died while or in the process of the Felony being committed.......

That is why there was no 1st Degree charge, there wasn't INTENT..

IF Arbery had managed to gain control of a weapon and killed one of the three, the other two could still be charged with Felony Murder..... for they were in the process of committing a Felony and someone died, it matters not if it was one of their own or an innocent by stander.........


"...A man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box..." Frederick Douglass, 1867

( . Y . )
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 790
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 790
Muffin you do à good job explaining the legal situation and I appreciate that. especially without referring to people as lazy or stupid. But couldn't the jury of found the non shooters guilty of lesser crimes.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,812
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,812
Originally Posted by Muffin
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by copperking81
]

How so?


Well I don't really want to type out all the fact on a phone, but Zimmerman was attacked while he was on the phone with 911, then pulled a gun...after being physically assaulted. The GA guys decided to try and do some sort of citizens arrest for a something? Pulled a gun when the guy wouldn't stop and then blasted him when he went for the shotgun.

They made poor decisions and paid for them. Obviously


Both made a stop. Both were attacked. So are you saying the GA guys shouldn't have had their weapons exposed... that's the difference?


You are missing a glaring difference in the two cases. Review the charges against the Georgia boys and see if one of the charges might be what precipitated the whole affair.


Ok, which one?


False imprisonment is a felony in GA. Under GA self-defense laws there are three circumstances identified in which self-defense is not authorized. Surely this deep into the conversation you have troubled yourself with reading the applicable GA self defense laws right?


Since Georgia law allowed citizens arrest which allows citizens to detane law breakers. Then the false imprisonment is canceled out





NOT 'Law Breakers', in general or of any kind, but those that you witnessed or have REASONABLE and PROBABLE grounds, known to have committed a FELONIUS act and are trying to evade/elude capture.............


Exactly



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
IC B3

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,295
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,295
Originally Posted by copperking81
So Trayvon attacked Zimmerman for simply keeping him in sight? In the GA guys video, at what point would you say they successfully restricted this movement?




Don't get hung up on the word successfully. Read GAs false imprisonment statute.

For me the combination of "I'll blow your head off" then getting out of the truck with a shotgun along Arbery's path of travel while the second vehicle came up from behind sealed the deal. At that point, I think the "confine" element of the law was met. I don't know what did it with the jurors.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,857
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,857
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by copperking81
So Trayvon attacked Zimmerman for simply keeping him in sight? In the GA guys video, at what point would you say they successfully restricted this movement?




Don't get hung up on the word successfully. Read GAs false imprisonment statute.

For me the combination of "I'll blow your head off" then getting out of the truck with a shotgun along Arbery's path of travel while the second vehicle came up from behind sealed the deal. At that point, I think the "confine" element of the law was met. I don't know what did it with the jurors.



What about Trayvon?

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,424
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,424
To be simple, again. Ahmaud Arbery was the only person that night in that place who was entitled by Georgia law to use deadly force.

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 4,887
S
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 4,887
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by Skankhunt42



Have you ever been party to an excange of gunfire? Or party to the subsequent court proceedings; Stupid Fuggggg?


Actually, I have. On more than one occasion. The matters are on record at the Payette Co courthouse.

As the perpetrators are still alive, it would foolish to expound on the matter and possibly antagonize the issue at this point.

I will not comment on it further.


LOL just STFU already

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 4,887
S
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 4,887

Originally Posted by Bwana_1
Originally Posted by Skankhunt42
Sorry, I said I was out of this...My bad



Smartest thing you've said in the whole thread.


Ya, genius. LIke you know what you are talking about lol

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 130,952
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 130,952
Originally Posted by 5thShock
To be simple, again. Ahmaud Arbery was the only person that night in that place who was entitled by Georgia law to use deadly force.

So, when Arbery attacked Travis McMichaels in an attempt to snatch his shotgun, what was Travis McMichael's legal obligation, assuming he wished to avoid being charged with murder? Please be specific.

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 7,982
Campfire Outfitter
Online Happy
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 7,982
Originally Posted by Skankhunt42
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by Skankhunt42



Have you ever been party to an excange of gunfire? Or party to the subsequent court proceedings; Stupid Fuggggg?


Actually, I have. On more than one occasion. The matters are on record at the Payette Co courthouse.

As the perpetrators are still alive, it would foolish to expound on the matter and possibly antagonize the issue at this point.

I will not comment on it further.


LOL just STFU already
Originally Posted by Bwana_1
Originally Posted by Skankhunt42
Sorry, I said I was out of this...My bad



Smartest thing you've said in the whole thread.


Ya, genius. LIke you know what you are talking about lol


For a new guy it doesn't appear you have the ability to civilly converse without calling every member rude names...tell me, are you old enough to shave ?

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,732
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,732
Originally Posted by jwp475

Since Georgia law allowed citizens arrest which allows citizens to detane law breakers. Then the false imprisonment is canceled out
.

That's not what Georgia law says, it's quite a bit more restrictive than what you stated, as far as who can make a citizen's arrest and for what.


It was also the centerpiece of the defense and as such would have been explained to the jury in detail multiple times by people infinitely more qualified on Georgia law (including the judge) than anyone here.

A jury of their peers heard those explanations of Georgia law, heard the evidence, and didn't buy that they acted in accordance with Georgia law.

That's how it's supposed to work, that's how it worked for Kyle Rittenhouse. What else does anyone need?



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 130,952
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 130,952
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 5thShock
To be simple, again. Ahmaud Arbery was the only person that night in that place who was entitled by Georgia law to use deadly force.

So, when Arbery attacked Travis McMichaels in an attempt to snatch his shotgun, what was Travis McMichael's legal obligation, assuming he wished to avoid being charged with murder? Please be specific.

I'm waiting.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,732
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45,732
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 5thShock
To be simple, again. Ahmaud Arbery was the only person that night in that place who was entitled by Georgia law to use deadly force.

So, when Arbery attacked Travis McMichaels in an attempt to snatch his shotgun, what was Travis McMichael's legal obligation, assuming he wished to avoid being charged with murder? Please be specific.



That's a false choice. His legal obligation was to not attempt to detain Arberry at gunpoint in the first place.



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Page 13 of 23 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 22 23

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
721 members (007FJ, 12344mag, 1234, 10gaugemag, 160user, 10gaugeman, 66 invisible), 3,129 guests, and 1,291 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,745
Posts18,401,279
Members73,822
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.113s Queries: 15 (0.007s) Memory: 0.9244 MB (Peak: 1.1045 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 14:17:02 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS