Looks promising, very nice actually, but won’t get me to abandon my CZ 75B Omega Convertible, which addresses the couple of minor quibbles I had with the original, and cost less than $600 when I bought it.
Here’s another updated 1935. These guys chose to keep the magazine safety, which doubtless seems like a good idea to folks who live where they can’t even own the pistols they make.
The Hi Power has always been about feel, if the new FN somehow duplicates that I will be all over it. 17 +1 ,4.5 lb trigger, take down lever, no bite, other improvements, but still a Hi Power. I don't like the rear sight, but this pistol looks to be a great candidate for an optical sight.
The ugly sister SA-35 does nothing for me.
Forgive me my nonsense, as I also forgive the nonsense of those that think they talk sense. Robert Frost
I'll bet that "40 ounces" gets edited down - that's about 8 ounces more than a classic Hi Power. I don't see how it could add that much weight.
I think the key here is that it is not a "hi power" but rather a "high power" - different design. I was thinking it was a Hi Power and scratching my head at where they added the extra 8.5oz of weight.
Handled an SA-35 last week at my LGS. They had one on loan to shoot. Good ergos nice trigger pull, sights. Waiting for them to get one for sale. Looks very much like the old BHP.
Still prefer LWT CCOs, Commander 1911s and the BHPs for EDC unless I really need a very discrete CWP, then it’s a P-365. To each his own.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty of give me death! P. Henry