Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Handguns Anyone take this guy serious?

I have investigated, either as the primary investigator, co-investigator, or as part of a team, a significant number of shootings, unknown death investigations, etc. As well as attended numerous training schools related to the subject of forensic investigation.

Never, not once was the issue of whether the person was shooting handloads, reloads, or factory ammunition end up being a factor in the case, in terms of prosecutorial outcomes. Not one single time. This was also discussed with other investigators from various state/federal agencies throughout the country when attending training.

Not one single time did anyone have any personal experience with an investigation where that was the case. Again, not one single time. And we are talking about combining literally thousands of shootings/investigations. Senior guys groan when some new guy brings up the dang question and it eats up time during the class too, as it gets covered over and over, year after year.


New Jersey v. Daniel Bias was brought up. It is such a statistical outlier that it is not worth bothering with.

Think about this.

These are rough numbers BTW.

NJ vs Bias happened in 1989.

There are (very roughly) 15,000 homicides a year.

That would be over 450,000 homicides since the NJ vs Bias.

Yet handloads have not really been a factor in those 450,000 cases, so guys are digging all the way back to the 80s.



Someone who makes his living selling fear based propaganda and classes is not a person I would rely on for unbiased information.

There are far more important things to worry about.

Not to completely rehash things but there's a decent thread here at 1911 forum. Discusses his video on mob attacks.

What's interesting - it's not so much about mob attacks but a lawyer's take on Massad and his history. Pretty interesting stuff if someone's looking to actually figure out if whom they listen to is worth it. Especially the difference between being "expert on the law" and an "expert witness" - Mas is one, not both. Guess which one it is?

Mas and Mobs - 1991 Forum

So, you really don't have any answers just sarcastic criticism.

If you really need answers or advice on this subject, I'll leave you this. Seek training from a qualified professional. Do not seek or give advice or training on public forums.

People lacking common sense and a functional BS filter would be better off to avoid the web entirely.

It used to be that old, experienced, wise, and opinionated came as a bundle. Nowadays any boomer with opinions thinks he qualifies.

Ayboob set that standard around 1980.

Were it not for the internet, he’d have Delta Force on his resume’.

In other news, Frank Dux did not win 321 fights.


LOL

Next you're going to say he never won the "Kumite"

It used to be that old, experienced, wise, and opinionated came as a bundle. Nowadays any boomer with opinions thinks he qualifies.