24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
O
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
I have a question to you win-94 guys.

My 1975 win is a 30-30 and shoots/handles really well, and the bluing still looks perfect.

Another forum I was on had multiple people writing in saying “ALL post-63 win 94’s have terrible bluing problems”.

Well, I take mine hunting in western and eastern washington and have NO Issues!
I do take just normal care with it if it got wet during the day’s hunt and wipe the bluing with a dry cloth, then a light rub with a lightly oiled cloth… 5-minute-job.

What are the issues they are talking about?

Thanks in advance for your input!

Crab


“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
--- Will Rogers
BP-B2

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,469
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,469

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
O
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754

Model70man,

Thanks for sending the link to du-lite.

Looks like my 1975 was du-lite’s last process of iron-plating and then the win blue/oxiblak process.
They did a good job because it’s lasted 47 years and counting!

😎


“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
--- Will Rogers
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,469
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,469
You are welcome Sir!

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,888
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,888
I have a 1974 model that the receiver is still black on. The mid to late 60s were the worst

IC B2

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 971
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 971
You will meet Winchester snobs who state that only the pre-1964 models are worthwhile. This is untrue. My high school buddy bought a new model 94 in 1972 and he continues to hunt with it after all these years. Nothing wrong with it's function or reliability. US Repeating Arms started building the angle-eject models during the early 1980's and these carbines are easily scoped for those of us with diminishing vision. In summary, Winchester 94's are keepers!

Sherwood


FIRE UP THE GRILL - is NOT catch and release!
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
O
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
My 1975 continues to shoot very well, and I’m going to keep it for good.
Just took it to the range today to sight it in on some FTX’s, and now have it drilled right in at 100 yds.

Was smiling as I was driving home, as those 94’s are a real joy to shoot.

Light, handy, and easy to hold-steady with… Doesn’t get any better than that!

I’m a happy camper.

😎👍

Crab


“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
--- Will Rogers
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,788
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,788
Originally Posted by Old_Crab
I’m a happy camper.

😎👍

Crab

But not the one that we all knew and loved.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Winchester has always had bluing issues with Winchester 94’s.

The earliest 94’s had really no problems, normal steel, normal fume bluing process gave excellent results. But that was only the first 18 months of production.
When Winchester switched to their famous “Nickel Steel” to accommodate smokeless powder, that’s where the problems started. When nickel steel was introduced the bluing process stayed the same, and the look was absolutely fantastic. Problem is, it didn’t last. That’s why you find so many ‘92’s and ‘94’s with little to no finish left on the receivers, yet the rest of the rifle looks great. It wasn’t until they went to the original (1.0??) Du-Lite process (Post WW2 IIRC) that they started wearing better. Most ‘94’s from 1946-1964 look and wear very well.
Then in ’64 they changed the metallurgy again and there were no existing chemical blackening processes that would take to the new steel, so they went to black chrome until they figured out a better process (that’s where the DuLite website comes into play).

The changes anger traditionalists, but the new metallurgy of the ‘94’s works very well. It machines exceptionally well, which means the internal machining of the post-64’s tends to be very nice and pretty smooth. The new steel is similar to stainless steel in its resistance to corrosion. Post-64 ‘94’s shoot every bit as well as pre-64’s, so they’re straight up good rifles.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,888
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,888
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Winchester has always had bluing issues with Winchester 94’s.

The earliest 94’s had really no problems, normal steel, normal fume bluing process gave excellent results. But that was only the first 18 months of production.
When Winchester switched to their famous “Nickel Steel” to accommodate smokeless powder, that’s where the problems started. When nickel steel was introduced the bluing process stayed the same, and the look was absolutely fantastic. Problem is, it didn’t last. That’s why you find so many ‘92’s and ‘94’s with little to no finish left on the receivers, yet the rest of the rifle looks great. It wasn’t until they went to the original (1.0??) Du-Lite process (Post WW2 IIRC) that they started wearing better. Most ‘94’s from 1946-1964 look and wear very well.
Then in ’64 they changed the metallurgy again and there were no existing chemical blackening processes that would take to the new steel, so they went to black chrome until they figured out a better process (that’s where the DuLite website comes into play).

The changes anger traditionalists, but the new metallurgy of the ‘94’s works very well. It machines exceptionally well, which means the internal machining of the post-64’s tends to be very nice and pretty smooth. The new steel is similar to stainless steel in its resistance to corrosion. Post-64 ‘94’s shoot every bit as well as pre-64’s, so they’re straight up good rifles.
Excellent post. Very informative

IC B3

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
O
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
Agree, great post.
Thanks GunGeek!


“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
--- Will Rogers
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
O
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
By the way, on blackening the post 64 receiver, for anyone who needs/plans to do that....
The Du-Lite group are posting that they HAVE a successful recipe of their products to do that now.

Here is what they are posting:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Du-Lite’s Process for Blackening Post ’64 Receivers
Du-Lite has developed a process that will blacken these receivers. Once blackened, these receivers will not turn red or discolor.

The Black Oxide Process for Winchester Post ’64 Receiver

Du-Lite #45 Cleaner, (12 oz/gal.) 150°-160° temp. for 10 min.
Warm water rinse – 150° temp.
50/50 HCL acid (muriatic acid) w/water, room temp. for 2-3 min.
Cold water rinse.
Aldak #30, (3-4 lbs/gal.), 220°-230° temp. for 20 min.
Cold water rinse.
Du-Lite 3-0 Bath (4½-5 lbs/gal), 240°-250° temp. for 20-30 min.
Cold water rinse.
Du-Lite Kwikseal or Kwikseal A, straight, room temp., 1 min.

Cheers,

Crab


“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
--- Will Rogers
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 919
I
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
I
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 919
I have a model 94 Winchester that was made in 1975. The finish on the receiver still looks just fine. Just a few tiny rust spots that were there when I acquired this rifle. It was a used gun.
It shoots great. Most of the ammo that I've shot in it have been my cast bullet loads. I have a Williams receiver sight on it.

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
O
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
Originally Posted by IMR4350
I have a model 94 Winchester that was made in 1975. The finish on the receiver still looks just fine. Just a few tiny rust spots that were there when I acquired this rifle. It was a used gun.
It shoots great. Most of the ammo that I've shot in it have been my cast bullet loads. I have a Williams receiver sight on it.

Sounds like we have twins.
I also have a Williams peep sight.


“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
--- Will Rogers
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 919
I
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
I
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 919
No not exact twins. I put a large loop lever on mine but still very close. They are still very practical rifles even after all these years.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 686
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 686
The problem is that its' not a "Pre 64". That's the same with all "W" guns. The pre 64 model 1894 is not without its' faults.....I have had to tighten a few action springs to alleviate feeding issues.....actually made a special driver to do it with. They are great guns though.


RAVENS & WOLVES

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
647 members (10gaugemag, 160user, 10gaugeman, 12344mag, 10Glocks, 12308300, 55 invisible), 3,115 guests, and 1,206 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,741
Posts18,401,179
Members73,822
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.123s Queries: 14 (0.006s) Memory: 0.8668 MB (Peak: 0.9802 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 13:36:34 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS