I think that they did it as a strategic move. This will allow them to target a broader category of weapons for their ban.
This ^^^ So they can sneak in a new definition of firearm. To catch the unknowing by surprise should the "right" incident arise. (let no emergency go to waste)
kwg
For liberals and anarchists, power and control is opium, selling envy is the fastest and easiest way to get it. TRR. American conservative. Never trust a white liberal. Malcom X Current NRA member.
2021 murders in USA 6k handguns of 72M 1k knives >>34M 447 rifles of 76M 243 clubs >>200M 152 shotguns of 64M
But rifles have political power.
One chip at a time.
Yep they’ll justify it as “if it saved just one life” but it won’t save ENOUGH lives and then they’ll say “well it’s handguns that KILL PEOPLE we need to ban those…”
I think that they did it as a strategic move. This will allow them to target a broader category of weapons for their ban.
This ^^^ So they can sneak in a new definition of firearm. To catch the unknowing by surprise should the "right" incident arise. (let no emergency go to waste)
Is Alan Gottlieb of The Second Amendment Foundation part of this Jewish propaganda machine?
Jews stick together like burrs, we do not need a single one of them no matter how impressed you are.
Jews win every time by controlling BOTH SIDES of every fake debate, whether we're talking communism v capitalism, or guns v gun bans, or Democrat v Republican. Thousands of examples of contrived controversy and false dichotomy.
I hope you guys will finally begin to see it. Most of the discussions here are asinine.
The Left is trying to use the "historical precedence" argument to their favor claiming there were no semiautomatic guns when the 2nd amendment was created. I think it's a very weak argument but every weak argument can become the strong truth if told enough to the right people.
Not this one. SCOTUS definitively dismissed this argument in Heller:
Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment. We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications,... and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, ... the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding. DC v Heller, page 8
When SCOTUS calls an argument "bordering on the frivolous" it's a polite way of saying it's idiotic. Which it is. ------------- Some seem to think that the left is acknowledging that "assault weapons" are just semiautomatics. What's really happening is that the left is redefining semiautomatics as "assault weapons".
