24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
In these powder scarce times, would you have a preference for one of these over the other?

both look good for use from 223 to 308, ball powder, relatively cheap.

if both were available which would you choose and why

(I have only used TAC in 223 and seems fine)


Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
GB1

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,991
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,991
I'm running TAC in my 223 and 308 and my son's 308. I've only used CFE223 in my 7mm-08 with 120's.


~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

“Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.”
ISAIAH 41:10
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 150,880
Campfire Savant
Offline
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 150,880
I use CFE 223 in my 223’s, works very well.

Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 930
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 930
I have 20 pounds of TAC on hand for 223, 308 and 30-30. I'm not looking to switch anytime soon.


What if Jessie's girl is Stacy's mom, and her phone number is 867-5309
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,654
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,654
TAC is much more temp stable than CFE if that matters to you. I've used both, personally I am moving to VV N140 in that general burn range.


'Four legs good, two legs baaaad."
----------------------------------------------
"Jimmy, some of it's magic,
Some of it's tragic,
But I had a good life all the way."
(Jimmy Buffett)

SotG
IC B2

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,942
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,942
CFE223 is not the best bang for the buck, especially in a 223. For me it worked well in a 204 Ruger. However, even in that cartridge, TAC shined. Another one to look at is X-terminator. It's less money ($28 vs. $31) than TAC and works very well. I've made a switch to other Ramshot powders because they were available when others were not. That speaks volumes. They also never jacked up their prices like other manufactures did either.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 930
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 930
Xterminator is a very good powder too, but not as versatile as TAC

Last edited by Dave_Spn; 12/03/22.

What if Jessie's girl is Stacy's mom, and her phone number is 867-5309
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,695
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,695
they are both interchangeable it seems....

so the real selling feature would be availability wouldn't it?

about ANYTHING works well in a 223 and a 308... which is convenient in democRat created times like these...


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Originally Posted by Seafire
they are both interchangeable it seems....

so the real selling feature would be availability wouldn't it?

about ANYTHING works well in a 223 and a 308... which is convenient in democRat created times like these...

I was also considering the in-between applications like 250 and 300 sav, and 30-30, maybe 25-35.

I think of those as classic 3031 territory, but wondering if TAC or CFE would get the nod for cartridges in between 223 and 308


Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
CFE223 is not the best bang for the buck, especially in a 223. For me it worked well in a 204 Ruger. However, even in that cartridge, TAC shined. Another one to look at is X-terminator. It's less money ($28 vs. $31) than TAC and works very well. I've made a switch to other Ramshot powders because they were available when others were not. That speaks volumes. They also never jacked up their prices like other manufactures did either.

Hunter is one I'm looking at because the price is so good. (in a different burn rate, NOT for 223 -308 range)


Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
IC B3

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,122
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,122
TAC never impressed me. CFE was better. Only two cartridges used in: .308 and .35 Whelen

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,942
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 47,942
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
CFE223 is not the best bang for the buck, especially in a 223. For me it worked well in a 204 Ruger. However, even in that cartridge, TAC shined. Another one to look at is X-terminator. It's less money ($28 vs. $31) than TAC and works very well. I've made a switch to other Ramshot powders because they were available when others were not. That speaks volumes. They also never jacked up their prices like other manufactures did either.

Hunter is one I'm looking at because the price is so good. (in a different burn rate, NOT for 223 -308 range)

Hunter and Big game are both great powders. If you have not tried it, I'd suggest you try it. I believe it is about $28 at midsouth and available a lot of times. I like using Hunter in my 7mm-08 and my 6.5x55. Excellent powder that gives consistent results.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,695
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,695
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by Seafire
they are both interchangeable it seems....

so the real selling feature would be availability wouldn't it?

about ANYTHING works well in a 223 and a 308... which is convenient in democRat created times like these...

I was also considering the in-between applications like 250 and 300 sav, and 30-30, maybe 25-35.

I think of those as classic 3031 territory, but wondering if TAC or CFE would get the nod for cartridges in between 223 and 308

sure, why not...

but guys like me don't need substitutes for 3031, because I'm always well stocked on it...


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,302
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,302
I tried TAC with 400 grain Woodies in my .405 WCF; my final load of a 5 shot string had zero ( 0 ) fps average deviation. Also accurate with 5 off hand shots into 10 inch ring at 50 yards. I quit there and went to RSA and shot this Cape Buff:
[Linked Image from jpgbox.com]

Chamber pressure topped out at 49,000 psi, a bit above recommended peak pressure for the 1895 .405.

I have since switched to VV N133 because of much (12,000 psi) lower peak chamber pressures (smooth curve, NO spikes).


CRS, NRA Benefactor Life Member, Whittington Center, TSRA, DWWC, DRSS
Android Reloading Ballistics App at http://www.xplat.net/
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 659
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 659
50 g TAC, 130 ttsx in a 308 prints very tiny groups in my Tikka.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
O
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,914
Originally Posted by SDupontJr
50 g TAC, 130 ttsx in a 308 prints very tiny groups in my Tikka.

I'm using just a bit less TAC and getting 0.5 MOA groups beyond 400 yards.

There's a lot to like about TAC.


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,603
N
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
N
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,603
I’ve never tried Tac but CFE223 is pretty much all I use in my 223. I need to give it a try in the 35 Whelen.


NRA Life,Endowment,Patron or Benefactor since '72.

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

280 members (10gaugemag, 280shooter, 204guy, 338reddog, 1_deuce, 264mag, 39 invisible), 2,060 guests, and 1,191 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,492
Posts18,452,151
Members73,901
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.049s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8705 MB (Peak: 0.9913 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-18 04:56:56 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS