24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,603
J
Joe Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,603
The FN FAL should have been the U.S. M14 IMHO.


Shew me thy ways, O LORD: teach me thy paths.
"there are few better cartridges on Earth than the 7 x 57mm Mauser"
"the .30 Springfield is light, accurate, penetrating, and has surprising stopping power"

Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,899
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,899
Originally Posted by Joe
The FN FAL should have been the U.S. M14 IMHO.

On that note:





GR

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,992
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,992
The 7.62x51 shined in the M60. But, I get the point with going to a round that was effective out to 400 yards. Especially one in 7mm. It was a missed opportunity. Then to go to the 5.56x45. That was a huge jump. Great story.

kwg


For liberals and anarchists, power and control is opium, selling envy is the fastest and easiest way to get it. TRR. American conservative. Never trust a white liberal. Malcom X Current NRA member.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,435
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,435
I have shot competition with both rifles. I shot the M1 first, then after years I bought a match conditioned M1A.
I think, maybe, I prefer the M1. It holds better in offhand for me, and it feels more solid if that is real. Probably because I used it first.
After the M16A2 was introduced in 1986, I got a AR16A2 in 87. That ended my 30 caliber career. Shortly after I quit service rifle due to time/money/job etc.
I have to sell those, but somehow I don't.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 9
B
New Member
Offline
New Member
B
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 9
I have both.
My M1A is a wood stocked Standard Model, as close as I could get to the M14's Uncle Sammy issued me.
When my eyes were 19 years old I could hit those pop up targets out to 500 meters with iron sights (optics weren't a "thing" in 1968). And that's not testament to me, but to the rifle.

My Garand is a 1945 Springfield that has been rebuilt an unknown number of times before CMP brought it back from Korea. It's a sweet rifle.
For self defense though I'd grab the M1A before the M1.

I was issued an M16A1 in Vietnam, and it was OK, but I've never had the urge to buy an AR.


"There is nothing so exhilarating as to be shot at without result."
Winston Churchill
Member: VFW, American Legion, Vietnam Veterans of America
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 4
C
New Member
Offline
New Member
C
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 4
In the article "M14 not much for fighting" he reference someone picking up a M1-a or M14 by the front or top handgaurd and upsetting the competitor who is shooting the rifle refering to an accuratized M14, that system belongs to the M1 garand, one has to fasten the handguard to the barrel band by epoxy and long countersunk screws and ream out the handguard front contact point with the barrel so it doesn't touch the barrel, if the rifle is handled by this handguard it can end up touching the barrel and destroying accuracy. The M14 doesn't even have one of these handguards, perhaps he is not as familiar with these two rifles as he is professing to be

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 58
L
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
L
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 58
I slightly prefer the Garand for shooting prone, because I can get a lower, more stable prone position without the magazine in the way. The Garand is harder to load prone rapid fire, but the prone match is usually slow fire. If you have a single load device {SLED}that works well, the loading is a wash.

I slightly prefer the M1A for standing because I can use the magazine as a palm rest. For the other positions there is little difference.

I have not used either in combat, though I did use a DRMO surplus M14 for SWAT for 3 years or so. I didn't shoot at anyone with it, the M14s went to the drill team for parades and funerals and we got new AR15s. If you had all your 30-06 in 8 clips you could keep up a pretty steady rate of fire I suppose. The darned clips are so expensive they aren't really disposable any more. Domestic shootouts are usually settled in the first few minutes anyway.

I think on the whole I find bedded M1as with a good barrel slightly more accurate than a comparable Garand. A good Garand will run rings around a fairly average M1A. All the above will hold the 10 ring if you do your part.

Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 53
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 53
Must have both !!! + & - to each of them.

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
They're both cool rifles. Lots of pluses and minuses depending on what you want to do with them;

For both the convention is powders with burn rates between 3031 and 4064 with the 4895's being the "go-tos" There's been a bunch of new powders since then, so you'll have to research whether they'll work...burn rate charts aren't always accurate when it comes to the Garand and m14. Bullets should be no heavier than 175's...maybe 178's (unless you're willing to get into the special mods to accomodate heavies).

Garands come with built in history. Can be had in 308 as well as 30-06. With out a magazine hanging down, they're easier to shoot in prone. With the 24" barrel you have a longer sight radius for easier sighting.
Oprod is less forgiving than in an M14/M1A.

Negatives: En-bloc clips take some doing to get the hang of and you'll probably learn what a "Garand Thumb" is in the process. You'll want a Garand SLED (single load enhancement device). Maybe a two round clip if you want to shoot Highpower.

M14/M1A's have an improved gas system with a gas cutoff. But you'll still have to observe the powder burn rate conventions. The Box magazine makes life a bit easier for loading.

Both are about 2 or 3 minute rifles out of the box. Both have known accurizing procedures (bedding, unitizing gas system etc) and can yield a 1 MOA rifle...but the smiths/armorers that are good at it are a dying breed. I personally know of recent wins logged by both at 600 and 1000 yards over very good AR shooters at big Service Rifle matches so they're certainly capable of accuracy still.

A competition gun ridden hard requires a good amount of maintenance. I'd get a rebed annually...and parts breakage was a regular occurence. Parts used to be readily available...but now you're competing with the collector market for the M1 and a dwindling supply for both. They're getting pricey.

Neither has what I would call a easily installed, solid scope mounting system.

Oh yeah...while that article is crap, he is right about the durability of a match tuned M14.

If you have an unlimited budget, there are a couple of chassis systems ie Sage, for the M14 that address bedding and scoping issues...but you'll be lugging a 12lb rifle at that point.

Last edited by ChrisF; 01/20/24.
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 12
D
New Member
Offline
New Member
D
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 12
M1 Garand, the original is better.


.458 Winchester Magnum, go big or go home.
IC B3

Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 12
D
New Member
Offline
New Member
D
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 12
FN - FAL,
better than M14, M1a, M1,


.458 Winchester Magnum, go big or go home.
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,411
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,411
To the OP, the difference for the basic ball ammunition (M2 vs M80) will not be enough to worry about out to 500 Meters; most people cannot hold well enough to tell the difference between the two.

The powder recommendations provided earlier are sound; IMR & H4895 will work in both the M1 and M1A. I have always full length sized my brass and have not needed a "small base die" for either the M1 or the M1A.

It really comes down to which rifle you like best (or both if you're a rifle looney).

I had a long love affair with the M14/M1A going back to the summer of 1976 when I watched the Marine Corps Rifle Team shoot at Camp Butner, NC against the Navy Team, a team from 18th ABN. Corps and several National Guard Teams. At that match the active-duty teams shot match conditioned M14's and the National Guard teams were shooting M1's. I was allowed to police up as much LC NM brass as I could carry; our 308 and 30-06 hunting rifles were well supplied with excellent brass for years after.

When I joined the Marine Corps in June 1977, we were issued M16A1's at Parris Island and I shot "Expert" (225 out 250) on the KD Course (200, 300 & 500 yards). My first shots with the M14 were a familiarization fire (FAM FIRE) at Camp Geiger while at the Infantry Training Regiment. I did make several attempts to get on the 8th Marines Regimental Team and I did finally succeed and shot several divisional matches and inter-service matches between deployments as part of the 2nd Marine Division Rifle Team.
Our rifles were M14's tuned up by the regimental armorers that were MOS 2112's and they had been trained at MCB Quantico Precision Weapons Section.

After leaving active duty to attend college I bought a standard grade M1A in late 1983 and ammunition (M118 & M852) was provided by my reserve unit and I did use lots of PMC & GI M80. I later acquired a M1A NM and it was bedded and I started shooting local EIC and Service Rifle Matches.
I fired my last match with a my double lugged M1A at Parris Island, SC in 2003, then I switched to a Rock River NM LAR-15A2 in 5.56mm.

While I no longer have an M1A I have stayed with the M1 and still use them recreationally along with the occasional John C. Garand Match.

You can't go wrong with either one.

StarchedCover

Last edited by StarchedCover; 01/24/24. Reason: Omitted word

Semper Fi
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,311
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,311
From what I gather, the M1 is a more accurate rifle and the 7.62x51 is a more accurate cartridge. To get the best of both get a M1 with a 7.62x51 barrel - that is if you're serious about paper punching.
I like the M1, I have two, one I've shot in matches and the other is like new. I'd like a M1A, but only the most accurate one I could find. I liked the M14, I'd really like to have the one I was issued. But M14's are crazy priced and I don't need nor desire the full auto function, though it would be a neat show and tell option.
Maybe I'll find a M1A that has my name on it, someday.

CMP has M1's for sale, now and then.


I prefer classic.
Semper Fi
I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
Quote
From what I gather, the M1 is a more accurate rifle and the 7.62x51 is a more accurate cartridge. To get the best of both get a M1 with a 7.62x51 barrel - that is if you're serious about paper punching.

LOL...In these two rifles in question, the 7.62 is the more accurate cartridge. It's largely due to the limitation in powders for the gas system. In short, you can't get close to 100% loading density in a 30-06 used in a Garand.

The rest of the statement about the Garand being the more accurate platform is probably not true from a competition standpoint. Bart Bobbit and Joe Sopko will tell you the Navy's Garands built by Mac McCoy were the most accurate Service Rifles on the line...but the Navy wasn't winning very often at the Nationals. The Army and the Marines Service Rifle Teams shot the best scores ever shot with a 30 caliber service rifle, but they both shot M14's once the accurizing was worked out.

Bottom line...shoot what makes you smile the biggest!

Last edited by ChrisF; 01/23/24.
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,311
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,311
Originally Posted by ChrisF
Quote
From what I gather, the M1 is a more accurate rifle and the 7.62x51 is a more accurate cartridge. To get the best of both get a M1 with a 7.62x51 barrel - that is if you're serious about paper punching.

LOL...In these two rifles in question, the 7.62 is the more accurate cartridge. It's largely due to the limitation in powders for the gas system. In short, you can't get close to 100% loading density in a 30-06 used in a Garand.

The rest of the statement about the Garand being the more accurate platform is probably not true from a competition standpoint. Bart Bobbit and Joe Sopko will tell you the Navy's Garands built by Mac McCoy were the most accurate Service Rifles on the line...but the Navy wasn't winning very often at the Nationals. The Army and the Marines Service Rifle Teams shot the best scores ever shot with a 30 caliber service rifle, but they both shot M14's once the accurizing was worked out.

Bottom line...shoot what makes you smile the biggest!


Disagree


I prefer classic.
Semper Fi
I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by Bugger
Originally Posted by ChrisF
Quote
From what I gather, the M1 is a more accurate rifle and the 7.62x51 is a more accurate cartridge. To get the best of both get a M1 with a 7.62x51 barrel - that is if you're serious about paper punching.

LOL...In these two rifles in question, the 7.62 is the more accurate cartridge. It's largely due to the limitation in powders for the gas system. In short, you can't get close to 100% loading density in a 30-06 used in a Garand.

The rest of the statement about the Garand being the more accurate platform is probably not true from a competition standpoint. Bart Bobbit and Joe Sopko will tell you the Navy's Garands built by Mac McCoy were the most accurate Service Rifles on the line...but the Navy wasn't winning very often at the Nationals. The Army and the Marines Service Rifle Teams shot the best scores ever shot with a 30 caliber service rifle, but they both shot M14's once the accurizing was worked out.

Bottom line...shoot what makes you smile the biggest!


Disagree

lol! Enjoy your Garands! My final statement in that post is I feel the most important.
This subject is fresh and relevant for me because I’m gearing up to compete with a .30 cal, Iron Sighted Service Rifle ie. Garand and M1-A. I’ve done the math and the critical thinking and I’m going with the M1A’s for ATC and LR Highpower. The Garand had two attractions. The 24” barrel gives a longer sight radius and velocity…but in the end, the M14’s other advantages won out.

I’ve got a bit of back and forth with friends in the know (thanks Nez, Dave and Joe) I’m at the stage of accumulating bullets and powders (lotsa cool new zoot options) so it’ll probably not be Sierra 2200’s this go around.

Maybe I’ll see you on the line with your Garand!

Last edited by ChrisF; 01/24/24.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,986
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,986
Originally Posted by ChrisF
Quote
From what I gather, the M1 is a more accurate rifle and the 7.62x51 is a more accurate cartridge. To get the best of both get a M1 with a 7.62x51 barrel - that is if you're serious about paper punching.

LOL...In these two rifles in question, the 7.62 is the more accurate cartridge. It's largely due to the limitation in powders for the gas system. In short, you can't get close to 100% loading density in a 30-06 used in a Garand.

The rest of the statement about the Garand being the more accurate platform is probably not true from a competition standpoint. Bart Bobbit and Joe Sopko will tell you the Navy's Garands built by Mac McCoy were the most accurate Service Rifles on the line...but the Navy wasn't winning very often at the Nationals. The Army and the Marines Service Rifle Teams shot the best scores ever shot with a 30 caliber service rifle, but they both shot M14's once the accurizing was worked out.

Bottom line...shoot what makes you smile the biggest!
If it's a big smile you are after, grab an M1 Carbine.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,634
Originally Posted by Bugger
From what I gather, the M1 is a more accurate rifle and the 7.62x51 is a more accurate cartridge.
Sort of, maybe???
For accurized target rifles, the M1A/M14 has the superior accuracy without a doubt.
For rack grade infantry rifles...Yeah, kinda. So when brand new, the M14 had superior accuracy to the M1. The problem was the fact that under normal use, the M14 beats its gas cylinder loose, and develops op-rod alignment issues. According to a government report, this starts at around 3,500 rounds...That's not much at all. So over time, the M1's may have started out with lesser accuracy, but they maintained their accuracy while the M14's just got a little bit worse every day. This issue was found to be a fundamental design flaw that would have been extremely expensive to correct, and was a leading issue in the cancellation of the M14. It would have caused a serious re-design, and then re-tooling on a rifle that already cost 9x the cost of a single AK; and was inferior to the AK in actual use.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
697 members (12344mag, 10Glocks, 10gaugemag, 160user, 1Akshooter, 1beaver_shooter, 72 invisible), 3,005 guests, and 1,405 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,681
Posts18,399,659
Members73,817
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.134s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8927 MB (Peak: 1.0614 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 21:44:19 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS