Ribka obsessed with the Gay. Thinks about it, dreams about it, even posts about it on the internet while giggling like an excited little girl...
That's true. Ribka has started all the gay threads - unusual obsession, but maybe not for him. He seems to be grooming CCCCCCC, Aces and QueenGnatTwat - the angry Christian blowhards that deep down are just plain old arseholes, and that are willing to "come on board" with little tyke Ribka.
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.
That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.
Tarqueen doesn't understand anything about logic, claims and burdens of proof, or could just be another troll.
You just proved that I understand logic and burdens of proof far better than you do!
LOL!!! You just proved what I wrote. I'm going say that you are a complete dumbfuck, unless you can prove otherwise. Must be true if you can't or won't dispute that - that's using your "logic".
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.
That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
It's not ad hominen when it is true. You dipshit, dumbfuck, dickbrains are all making unsubstantiated claims, and that's a fact.
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.
That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You see only one side. The side that suits your own delusions. You ignore the insults that your mob initated, focus on the defense and pretend its just one sided.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
That's you and your mob.
The discussion barely gets started before you and your lot demonstrate a poor understanding of logic, reason, the nature of evidence, science and falsifiability....at which point the theists resort to ad homs and insults.
It's there to be seen in every thread where the beliefs of theism and the nature of faith is questioned.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
That's you and your mob.
The discussion barely gets started before you and your lot demonstrate a poor understanding of logic, reason, the nature of evidence, science and falsifiability....at which point the theists resort to ad homs and insults.
It's there to be seen in every thread where the beliefs of theism and the nature of faith is questioned.
Were you ever going to answer my question about the non-relative, objective basis for your claims of moral supremacy? Its been more than two days and....crickets.
Were you ever going to answer my question about the non-relative, objective basis for your claims of moral supremacy? Its been more than two days and....crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
Originally Posted by Tarquin
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
Were you ever going to answer my question about the non-relative, objective basis for your claims of moral supremacy? Its been more than two days and....crickets.
KB
A homosexual cricket?
While he is trying to figure out the non-relative, objective ground of his moral superiority, perhaps DBT can be persuaded to explain to us how not leaving any off-spring (or comparatively fewer offspring that heterosexuals) confers a selection advantage on homosexuals that perpetuates their "gay genes" in the population!
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
Originally Posted by Tarquin
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
Tarquin, nice and I agree.
Thanks Raspy. Us knuckle-dragging troglodytes need to stick together.
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person' Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
Thanks for this excellent post Tarquin - you have carefully explained the act of assessment/critique of statements and positions by others - which have nothing to do with attacks on a person. There is such a significant difference.
The two Aussies call people names, label folks in various ways, and post nasty personal attacks in general and seem to think those are part of analytical discussion/discourse. You may have given them insight to their ad hominem attacks.
P.S. In keeping with the above, this post is not an ad hominem attack.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
Noted..........never get into an argument with Tarquin.
Ad hominem attacks are fallacious. DBT made one against RBKA, which I exposed and then you responded to my use of logic (pointing out that DBT's response was a fallacy) by making two fallacious (ad hominem) attacks of your own. If you had a logical argument to make (and name-calling isn't one), we'd hear it. But since you've proved (with your own mouth---or fingers rather!) that all you can do is call names, you've proven (again, with your own mouth [fingers!]) that you and logic are complete strangers! In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves!
You and your girlfriends iniiate ad homs and hostilities then whine about the backlash. Your dishonestly and lies have been noted many times. If you call yourself a Christian as a despicable liar, you don't do Christianity any service.
Where did I make an ad hominem attack in this thread?
Read the content of your own post. Do you even know what 'ad hom' means? Are you really that dumb?
What did I say that was ad hominem? And when are you going to tell us (my question in the other thread) the non-relative, objective ground that justifies you in calling others intolerant and bigoted? So far its been crickets.
Apparently you have no idea of what 'ad hominem means....which is literally 'aimed or directed at the person'
Your post and practically everything you said in it was directed at the person. It was not an objective discussion or addressed at some point of impersonal discussion, but personal, ie an ad hom.
When a discussant advances positions that show he doesn't understand simple logic, it isn't ad hominem to point that out. To illustrate the point: your claim that I don't know the definition of ad hominem is not ad homimen. It's factually incorrect, it's ignorant, but it's not a personal attack on me, any more than pointing out Mauser's fallacious reasoning showed that he and logic were strangers, was a personal attack on him. When a person makes an argument that is fallacious, it's not ad hominem to point that out to them (and everyone else! ) and to likewise to point out that the discussant's fallacious reasoning is evidence he lacks the tools for rational thought. Another illustration to help you with the distinction: if a discussant makes arguments that supply evidence he is a lying, it isn't ad homimen to point out what his own arguments prove. Your understanding of ad hominem shows you are ignorant of the definition and its not ad hominem to point that out! Hope this clears it up for you.;) And that's not ad hominem either!
Noted..........never get into an argument with Tarquin.
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
The difference between you Tarquin, is that you handle it like a MAN not a Puzzy like our athiest Aussie (friends) and I do use that term loosely!
Never seen a bigger bunch of Whining Cry-Babies on 24HR!
PS: Me too, I have been hammered on more than 1 occasion lol
Yes, that cricket is a homo cricket, notice on of its antenna are swinging to the left? They always have to tweak something in order to stand out hahaha
Little Girl BuzzingFly gets her knickers in a twist and posts her own picture on the forum in a fit of petulant anger and angst, a little girl who wants everything her own way....the bad men in Australia dare question her faith.....boohooo, boohoo, nasty men, she wails.
There, there, Princess, I'm sure mommy will give you cuddle and you'll feel better......
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
It's getting kicked now. It's just that you have grown so much callus tissue on your fat rump that it doesn't register. You are used to getting your arse kicked. Poor Queenie.
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
It's getting kicked now. It's just that you have grown so much callus tissue on your fat rump that it doesn't register. You are used to getting your arse kicked. Poor Queenie.
When this is the riposte ^^^^^ you know you've won!
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
It's getting kicked now. It's just that you have grown so much callus tissue on your fat rump that it doesn't register. You are used to getting your arse kicked. Poor Queenie.
When this is the riposte ^^^^^ you know you've won!
Of course that's what you would think, but be honest, you never even had a hope - you failed from the start.
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.
That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
It's getting kicked now. It's just that you have grown so much callus tissue on your fat rump that it doesn't register. You are used to getting your arse kicked. Poor Queenie.
When this is the riposte ^^^^^ you know you've won!
What have you won, Queenie, the Big Boob prize in this years Gay pride parade? Put it proudly on your desk and bask in the glory, Sweetie.
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
It's getting kicked now. It's just that you have grown so much callus tissue on your fat rump that it doesn't register. You are used to getting your arse kicked. Poor Queenie.
When this is the riposte ^^^^^ you know you've won!
What have you won, Queenie, the Big Boob prize in this years Gay pride parade? Put it proudly on your desk and bask in the glory, Sweetie.
Trust me. I've had my ass kicked many times on 24hour!
It's getting kicked now. It's just that you have grown so much callus tissue on your fat rump that it doesn't register. You are used to getting your arse kicked. Poor Queenie.
When this is the riposte ^^^^^ you know you've won!
What have you won, Queenie, the Big Boob prize in this years Gay pride parade? Put it proudly on your desk and bask in the glory, Sweetie.
You're really hurting me! Please. Stop!
I don't think I am hurting you. Your sadomasochism is clearly on display. You thrive on abuse, which is why you hurl it in hope of receiving as much as you can in return. In your Gay mind, the more you get the better you feel about yourself. A kind of therapy, a form of self justification for your Gayness.
We know that Barnard is an apologist for sodomy and given that Conrad stalks and attacks me personally every time I defend morality (notice I didn't say traditional morality; its redundant) it's safe to assume Conrad and Barnard are of like minds on this issue. Recall that Conrad is already on record as criticizing the idea that there are only two genders and has explicitly stated that the United States Constitution is "Sharia Law". But notice neither of the Bobsy twins are able to respond on the merits to anything I've argued in this thread. Which is to say, if either had a substantive argument to make, they'd have made it and since they didn't, they don't. Like most children, all they can do is call names.
Douche Bag t obsessed with Christianity. Thinks about it, dreams about it and can't help but to post about it when its not even mentioned, along with her mauserless friend. Tightest of girlfriends, for sure. Initiates ad hominem attacks, accuses others of doing it and then demands them to define the term. Widely known as hostile, whiny and dishonest, with numerous posts as evidence. Her attempt to appear educated while being incapable of proper grammar proves her to be a liar. Cries about the backlash of her unprovoked attacks.
Sees only one side. The side that benefits her emotional conclusions. She and her know-it-all mob ignore her insults, poor communication skills and other short-comings but quickly point it out in others. They all focus on the defense and pretend she never said anything ignorant or false. It reveals their lack of honesty.
She can barely make sense in writing and forgets who she's answering. Uses words like "Logic" and "Reasoning" while just mindlessly recycling the cut and pasted thoughts of others. Corrupts science by using it's title to justify false terms and definitions. Knickers perpetually twisted, a little girl who wants everyone to see things her way. Makes bigoted attacks on Americans that state facts. Waaah. Waaah. Boo-hoo. Sniff. Sniff She whines and wails, repeatedly. Now, now, little princess. Just show the psychologist what the bad man did to you on this teddy bear.
The mauserless sidekick eagerly jumps in to defend her idol. After all, in the realm of no brains, the one with half of one is worshiped. Cursing, spitting nonsensical phrases and frothing, she lifts her dress to curtsy every time her dim-witted leader speaks, regardless of how dry, humorless and ignorant it is....
Both thriving on the attention. They greedily scour for responses. The lack of self esteem on proud display in every word they post in immediate response. Constantly mentioning men's butts. Defending the acts of human predators to justify their perverted lifestyles. Therapy for the sexually-frustrated, socially inept loner.
Liars and women of poor character....both of them.
I am not bothering to read this crap as I am not interested in reading anything from any arsehole that defends the ring events or the creatures that participate.
This gay crap does not represent me or mine and I resent having it perpetually shoved in my face and being told to like it.
Douche Bag t obsessed with Christianity. Thinks about it, dreams about it and can't help but to post about it when its not even mentioned, along with her mauserless friend. Tightest of girlfriends, for sure. Initiates ad hominem attacks, accuses others of doing it and then demands them to define the term. Widely known as hostile, whiny and dishonest, with numerous posts as evidence. Her attempt to appear educated while being incapable of proper grammar proves her to be a liar. Cries about the backlash of her unprovoked attacks.
Sees only one side. The side that benefits her emotional conclusions. She and her know-it-all mob ignore her insults, poor communication skills and other short-comings but quickly point it out in others. They all focus on the defense and pretend she never said anything ignorant or false. It reveals their lack of honesty.
She can barely make sense in writing and forgets who she's answering. Uses words like "Logic" and "Reasoning" while just mindlessly recycling the cut and pasted thoughts of others. Corrupts science by using it's title to justify false terms and definitions. Knickers perpetually twisted, a little girl who wants everyone to see things her way. Makes bigoted attacks on Americans that state facts. Waaah. Waaah. Boo-hoo. Sniff. Sniff She whines and wails, repeatedly. Now, now, little princess. Just show the psychologist what the bad man did to you on this teddy bear.
The mauserless sidekick eagerly jumps in to defend her idol. After all, in the realm of no brains, the one with half of one is worshiped. Cursing, spitting nonsensical phrases and frothing, she lifts her dress to curtsy every time her dim-witted leader speaks, regardless of how dry, humorless and ignorant it is....
Both thriving on the attention. They greedily scour for responses. The lack of self esteem on proud display in every word they post in immediate response. Constantly mentioning men's butts. Defending the acts of human predators to justify their perverted lifestyles. Therapy for the sexually-frustrated, socially inept loner.
Liars and women of poor character....both of them.
Get over yourself, Ray, you are not the hero you think you are.
You are nothing more than a little man with a huge chip on his shoulder.
A small minded grub, a whining child who gets his/her kicks by trolling on the internet.
Get over yourself, Ray, you are not the hero you think you are.
You are nothing more than a little man with a huge chip on his shoulder.
A small minded grub, a whining child who gets his/her kicks by trolling on the internet.
You need medication. Get professional help.
Give it up, Doucher. You aren’t the witty intellectual you pretend to be.
You’re nothing more than a grubby troll pursuing her delusion of significance on an unmoderated forum.
A trailer-dwelling scrub with a dial-up modem and lots of cats, praying for anything that proxies real human interaction that is clearly absent from your life.
Consider leaving your shoddy, dark, cat urine engulfed caravan to get your Zoloft refilled. Your mental health is important.
That's a surprise, I though RayTard had died of aids already. Guess I was wrong.
It was like walking on pins and needles for a while, but me and the entire starting line up of the LA Lakers are in the clear. Its been 6 months since that night with your mom and we’re all testing negative.
We were mortified to hear the news, though. How’s her antiretroviral therapy coming along?
don't care about all that back & forth bickering on this thread
just wanted to share that meme made for Mauserless when It jumped outta the closet some time back & announced it's gayness for all to see
Not something the 'Fire members didn't already suspect, we all have seen it's constant mention & love of bidets and anal debauchery, outta nowhere, on any subject, mauserless always had sphincter wrinkles on it's mind
You be you, just don't touch the kids
"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants".
don't care about all that back & forth bickering on this thread
just wanted to share that meme made for Mauserless when It jumped outta the closet some time back & announced it's gayness for all to see
Not something the 'Fire members didn't already suspect, we all have seen it's constant mention & love of bidets and anal debauchery, outta nowhere, on any subject, mauserless always had sphincter wrinkles on it's mind
You be you, just don't touch the kids
That's a surprise - I thought you'd died already of Alaska pox. I guess I was wrong. You still cutting and pasting images from your favorite comic books?
Based on your cartoon, is that how you got Alaska pox? They said you were dead.
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.
That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.
Get over yourself, Ray, you are not the hero you think you are.
You are nothing more than a little man with a huge chip on his shoulder.
A small minded grub, a whining child who gets his/her kicks by trolling on the internet.
You need medication. Get professional help.
Give it up, Doucher. You aren’t the witty intellectual you pretend to be.
You’re nothing more than a grubby troll pursuing her delusion of significance on an unmoderated forum.
A trailer-dwelling scrub with a dial-up modem and lots of cats, praying for anything that proxies real human interaction that is clearly absent from your life.
Consider leaving your shoddy, dark, cat urine engulfed caravan to get your Zoloft refilled. Your mental health is important.
Coming from a butt hurt little c unt like you, Raytard, that's funny.
It's funny because you try hard to project your own inadequacies onto your opponents (self created) while imagining you are making a point. Sad really.
Sad little Raytard.
Just keep in mind that you can't help being a retard, you were born that way, so you have no point to make, try come to terms with your condition and stop your incessant wailing and whining.
don't care about all that back & forth bickering on this thread
just wanted to share that meme made for Mauserless when It jumped outta the closet some time back & announced it's gayness for all to see
Not something the 'Fire members didn't already suspect, we all have seen it's constant mention & love of bidets and anal debauchery, outta nowhere, on any subject, mauserless always had sphincter wrinkles on it's mind
You be you, just don't touch the kids
Aussie men love their fake vaccines and gerbils. Dbt probably put wombats up 9mm stretched out rectum. Lol
don't care about all that back & forth bickering on this thread
just wanted to share that meme made for Mauserless when It jumped outta the closet some time back & announced it's gayness for all to see
Not something the 'Fire members didn't already suspect, we all have seen it's constant mention & love of bidets and anal debauchery, outta nowhere, on any subject, mauserless always had sphincter wrinkles on it's mind
Coming from a butt hurt little c unt like you, Raytard, that's funny.
It's funny because you try hard to project your own inadequacies onto your opponents (self created) while imagining you are making a point. Sad really.
Sad little Raytard.
Just keep in mind that you can't help being a retard, you were born that way, so you have no point to make, try come to terms with your condition and stop your incessant wailing and whining.
Captain Douche Bag t. Hero of the 24HCF wombat faction. Tragic Outback inbred trying to find some sort of meaning in life through repetitive pidgin posts.
Super Karen in desperate need of her Zoloft. Projector of her mental illness. Deflector of inconvenient truths. Homo Erectus squared. Keeper of Mauserless’s period.
Oh, look, the smelly swamp rats are gathering in order to squeal in outrage and impotence, keyboard cowards vainly searching for an escape from their miserable lives.
How's your cat p iss soaked caravan holding up, Raytard? Do you need a loan to make repairs? Perhaps the cats are hungry because you have no money for food?
The little Outback inbred appears to be quite agitated lately.
Her pseudonym and intentional anonymity usually make her feel brave on the keyboard, but it must be time to have her meds boosted. She progressed from projecting her own inadequacies on others to fantasizing about Americans overpowering her and confiscating her dilapidated, piss-soaked trailer and cat friends.
The little Outback inbred appears to be quite agitated lately.
Her pseudonym and intentional anonymity usually make her feel brave on the keyboard, but it must be time to have her meds boosted. She progressed from projecting her own inadequacies on others to fantasizing about Americans overpowering her and confiscating her dilapidated, piss-soaked trailer and cat friends.
Seek help, little Doucher. You are not well.
Yet you were the one who leaped in to agitate. It was quiet until that point.
Which is just more proof that you are a low life lying troll, a keyboard coward with the mind of a toddler, a troll who agitates then plays the innocent victim.
Go clean your smelly cat p*ss stained caravan, troll, and don't forget to to feed the cats.
In fact, you two are such thorough strangers, you don't even know you're strangers, as this thread conclusively proves! 
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/MtZwDsV.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/2SomGgX.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/yYDjsxrQ/IMG-0124.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/9471/cPstHu.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/ngMFFmL.gif)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/6452/bTw78D.jpg)
