Home Forums Lever Action Central Lever Actions - General Savage is back in the Lever gun game.

unfortunately not 99's.

They are bringing back the .22 lever repeater they took over from Ithaca, back in the '70's, then made by Erma, and later what Henry copied to start their Company.

So, a long proven design. First in .22lr then WMR and 17's next spring. Real Walnut, Presumably this rendition will be Turk made.

There ain't nothing right in that whole post except that Savage has a new lever action rimfire rifle. What a fuggin dope as per usual.

prove me wrong pissant.
I stand by my word.

Blackidiot, you might wanna look at NRA'S web page before you go telling more lies you worthless bucket of monkey piss.

Your word ain't worth shyt. Just like your information. You gotta be the dumbest mother fuucker on the fire. Here's a couple clues for your ignorant ass. It ain't the same design as the Erma/Ithaca/Henry and it's made in Canada. Idiot.

The original Henry rimfire debuted in 1860. Savage was founded in the 1890s.

Only similarity to the old Ithaca is they both have a lever.. The Ithaca LA .22 that actually worked often enough to stay in production was the Model 49 a single shot . The 49R was a repeater but never actually worked , every one sent back for repair they kept . Hopefully the Savage will not be a repeat of the Ithaca repeater.

Another unnecessary personal attack from trolls.

Fuuck you. This know it all RAM ass hole deals in name calling, personal attacks and false information on a daily basis. He has it coming and then some. He's more than earned it.

You have proved my point.

The lever gun they made based on the Ithaca 49 was a single shot martini type action with a fake magazine tube to look like a repeater, nothing much in common with this new design as mentioned above by EddieSouthgate.

The Revel will be made in Canada in the old Cooey plant where the Savage 64 is made. The 64 was an improvement of a COOEY Model 64 that was designed by Hubert Cooey and introduce in 1964 - wiki/Savage_Model_64

The parts diagram of the Revel does not show all the internals but the bolt & lever look almost identical to those in the Erma/Henry levers so it is probably is a development from that design. The bottom of the bolt looks the same with a notch near the rear for a locking arm that pivots up from the rear of the receiver.



The Henry pumps use almost all the same parts as the lever actions, so there might be a pump action Savage in the future.


The parts for the Savage/Stevens Model 89 & variants -

Mind your own business troll.

neither of you seem to have any intelligent information to offer about the subject. Please explain how this is any of your business since you have mentioned nothing of worth relating to the subject? Use the private message system for anything you think is not supposed to be other peoples business... and it won't be!

Looks like fun to me. https://savagearms.com/firearms/model/revel-classic

Here's my quick take on it from a post made in the Rimfire forum. It looks like it'd be a nice plinker or small game rifle, they've certainly given it a good chance to be accurate. I have a couple of nits to pick with it but those might not bother someone else at all.

Savage Revel quick look

You aren't the fuggin hall monitor now boy so GFY. If you knew anything of relevance to the subject you'd not have brought the Ithaca 49 into the conversation as it would have been evident RAM was referring to the Erma made Ithaca 72 saddlegun in his original post. Furthermore your comparison of the new Savage to the Henry is about like saying the Ithaca 37 and Browning BPS are based off the same design because they both eject out the bottom, are pump action and have similar lifters. That's where the similarity ends and beyond that they are very different designs.

Why can no one make a levergun that doesn't look like a cheap pot metal BB gun? That thing looks chintzier than an Henry, and that's saying something.

At least Browning still makes the BL22. Chiappa seem to make a outwardly decent copy of the gold standard Marlin 39, but I am doubtful as to its quality, given the brand.

They could but since better than half of working Americans have no savings, are in debt up to their eyeballs and can't handle a 1K unexpected expense, they aren't likely to spend the 1200.00 it would take to make one the way you'd like it on a .22. Cheaper is necessary in order to appeal to the masses of the blue collar working poor.

Its an ugly s.o.b.

Dang Blackheart, you picked the right user name. You spew venom and personal attacks more than any dozen other members who tend to be excitable and let fly the occasional insult or snarky post/reply.

Just WOW!