I am pretty new to bullet casting. I did it decades ago with a brother-in-law for his black powder pistol. But even that was only round ball. So I've got some lead, a Lee production pot to cast, a large pan and a propane burner. I also bought a used 450 LubSizer from a guy. Then I heard about powder coating. But it looks like powder coat may be less messy and less BS. Also higher velocities I hope? Looking to do the usual 9mm, 38, 41, 44, 45 pistol but also looking to do 223, 6.5 creedmore, and 30/30 rifle bullets also. So the question is multi prong. So do I need/go to gas check bullets for the low velocity bullets and lube them. Or non-gas checks and PC them? Seems like I'd like to skip a step on the install and expense of gas checks when I can. Now when it comes to the rifle bullets can I just Powder coat them? Any recommendations as to bullet moulds? Or makers of bullet moulds? Lee, Lyman, etc. Thank you to any and all who take the time to respond.
If the bullet is designed for a gas check, use one. If not .. sort obvious, but don't. The base of the bullet is where the magic happens .. good and bad. If you're going to use bevel based bullets, I'd recommend either PC or a Star sizer. BB is tougher with RCBS/Lyman style sizers. Star is .. or was .. pretty expensive.
I would probably pick a non gas check bullet for revolvers and semi-autos, gas checked for rifles.
Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.
You can push powder coated bullets to much higher velocities than standard lubed bullets with no leading. But with rifle cartridges you can only get to ~1500? fps before you need a gas check as a general rule (with a lot of exceptions). Also generally....bullets designed for a gas check are more accurate with a gas check installed. After using standard lubes for decades in the last few years I went to using almost all powder coated bullets. Especially for rifle cartridges. It is rapidly taking over.
You need to start reading the Castboolits forums. The easiest way to find an answer is to do a google search of what you want to know and also type in "boolits". They are popular enough so don't need to use a trick to specify a website and the hits from the site will be on top. They have the answer to all of your questions and should have load and bullet recommendations for everything you are reloading.
As others have already said, if the bullet base is designed for a check then use one. When I started casting Lee 440gn bullets for my 500 Magnum, gas checks weren't available so I tested them without checks but with a heavier powder coat on the base. Most had no issues but some had severe gas cutting and poor accuracy. In the pic you can see the base was fine and the gas cutting started at the lower drive band and continued all the way through the top band. Nearly all the gas cutting occurred over 1500FPS. Once I started using checks the gas cutting stopped and accuracy was noticeably improved.
Thats the area of the bullet where pressure and friction is the greatest. If the gas were "cutting", it would do the same on the bare check shank. It does not.
Its also looks possibly undersized, at least I don't see any rifling imparted? Another sign of of friction= slippage from not having full diameter support and seal.
A gas check does several things. It hardens the base where pressure and friction is greatest and doesn't melt. It also scrapes fouling keeping bore condition consistent at high temps, where lead loses some strength.
It does not matter when you put the gas check on. Some shanks will let you put it on after you pc while others will not. The only way is to try both ways and see what works for you. If you are using aluminum then usually always put it on after you pc. They have a tendency to fall off while putting the powder on.
You can push powder coated bullets to much higher velocities than standard lubed bullets with no leading. But with rifle cartridges you can only get to ~1500? fps before you need a gas check as a general rule (with a lot of exceptions). Also generally....bullets designed for a gas check are more accurate with a gas check installed. After using standard lubes for decades in the last few years I went to using almost all powder coated bullets. Especially for rifle cartridges. It is rapidly taking over.
You need to start reading the Castboolits forums. The easiest way to find an answer is to do a google search of what you want to know and also type in "boolits". They are popular enough so don't need to use a trick to specify a website and the hits from the site will be on top. They have the answer to all of your questions and should have load and bullet recommendations for everything you are reloading.
That was just what I was going to say. +1
The person I commented on with "gas cutting" issues powder coated his bullets, yet clearly had leading that he related to "gas cutting" at what he stated was 1,500 fps..
I'm still using traditional lubes at 2,900 fps (with a gas check), but most are around the 2,500 mark in the cartridges I use.
Please explain to me how powder coating can allow me to push to higher velocities than I am currently getting.....if that can't be explained, then why is a bullet with a gas check shank more accurate with a gas check installed?
We have to make an assumption, Hawk, that the PC /leading situation didn't involve an improper PC'ing, ie: a wispy thin coating that would wear through in a thrice.
At those velocities and traditional lubes you've carried through the then groundbreaking experiments by a handful of determined guys 40+ years ago. Kudos to you! Sometimes the easy way out (PC'ing in this instance) isn't a panacea rather merely an alternative. The Johnny-come-lately's to the hobby maybe never knew that PC'ing came about as an alternative means of achieving high "hunting" velocities with alloys soft enough to expand yet not horribly lead the barrel, not necessarily a means for ignoring some of the basic precepts of cast bullet shooting.
Not sure I understand the question in paragraph 3. I will say though that perhaps a GC bullet sans gas check presents a disruption to the air flow as it transitions from the side of the bullet to the base - air flow uninterrupted by the naked stepped base would flow cleanly and swirl uniformly against the flat bottom? That's my theory anyway. Me, I'll continue using gc's where they're supposed to be, even when dabbling with slow velocities because I've proved to my satisfaction that a gc'ed bullet at low velocity with its gc in place is generally more accurate than without. Sometimes not a helluva lot more accurate, sometimes a great amount more accurate, but pretty much always more accurate to one degree or another.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
You can push powder coated bullets to much higher velocities than standard lubed bullets with no leading. But with rifle cartridges you can only get to ~1500? fps before you need a gas check as a general rule (with a lot of exceptions). Also generally....bullets designed for a gas check are more accurate with a gas check installed. After using standard lubes for decades in the last few years I went to using almost all powder coated bullets. Especially for rifle cartridges. It is rapidly taking over.
You need to start reading the Castboolits forums. The easiest way to find an answer is to do a google search of what you want to know and also type in "boolits". They are popular enough so don't need to use a trick to specify a website and the hits from the site will be on top. They have the answer to all of your questions and should have load and bullet recommendations for everything you are reloading.
That was just what I was going to say. +1
The person I commented on with "gas cutting" issues powder coated his bullets, yet clearly had leading that he related to "gas cutting" at what he stated was 1,500 fps..
I'm still using traditional lubes at 2,900 fps (with a gas check), but most are around the 2,500 mark in the cartridges I use.
Please explain to me how powder coating can allow me to push to higher velocities than I am currently getting.....if that can't be explained, then why is a bullet with a gas check shank more accurate with a gas check installed?
Thanks.
Powder coating allows the use of softer alloys. The step in the bullet base focuses pressure and heat against the first full diameter band of lead on a gas checked bullet design. Velocity is not the Holy Grail in cast bullets.
I worry more about the sprue cut on the base of the bullet kicking the gas check crooked. Even sanded a few to remove the cut but never “proved” it helped.
You can create a very hard alloy with WW, lino and magnum shot using very high heat. Then cast your bullets using ingots in your drop pot with frequent fluxing and water drop the bullets. These bullets could then be heat treated. Instead, you can use Eastwood chrome plating, black, to double coat and double bake them, nose down in a hardware cloth upside down box, then size the PCed bullets to the exact groove diameter. They will do 2,400 tp 2,500 without leading in a rifle. I use the plain base RCBS 200 grain 358 with no gas check and no leading in my 35 Whelen and 358 MGP AR-15s, two and get sub 1/2" groups at 100.
You are not doing something correctly, if you get lower velocity leading.
“To expect defeat is nine-tenths of defeat itself. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. It is best to plan for all eventualities then believe in success, and only cross the failure bridge if you come to it." Francis Marion - The Swamp Fox